Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-hw7sx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T13:18:11.410Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Longitudinal flight control design with handling quality requirements

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2016

D. Saussié ,
L. Saydy  and
O. Akhrif
D. Saussié
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, École Polytechnique de Montréal, Montréal, Canada
L. Saydy
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, École Polytechnique de Montréal, Montréal, Canada
O. Akhrif
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, École de Technologie Supérieure, Montréal, Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This work presents a method for selecting the gain parameters of a C* control law for an aircraft’s longitudinal motion. The design incorporates various handling quality requirements involving modal, time- and frequency-domain criteria that were fixed by the aircraft manufacturer. After necessary model order-reductions, the design proceeds in essentially two-steps: stability augmentation system (SAS) loop design and control augmentation system (CAS) loop design. The approach partly relies on the use of guardian maps to characterise, in each case, the set of gain parameters for which desired handling quality requirements are satisfied. The approach is applied throughout the full flight envelope of a business jet aircraft and yields satisfactory results.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 110 , Issue 1111 , September 2006 , pp. 627 - 637
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2006 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1. Saydy, L., Akhrif, O. and Zhu, G., Handling quality characterization of flight system controller gains, 2000, Conference on Electronics, Circuits and Systems, 2, pp 721–724.Google Scholar
2. Saussié, D., Saydy, L. and Akhrif, O., Flight control design with robustness and handling qualities requirements, Electrical and Computer Engineering, 2003, IEEE CCECE Montreal, 3, pp 1749–1752.Google Scholar
3. Saussié, D., Akhrif, O. and Saydy, L., Robust and scheduled longitudinal flight control design with handling quality requirements, 2005, AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibition, San Francisco, CA, USA; 15-18 August 2005.Google Scholar
4. Saussié, D., Akhrif, O. and Saydy, L., Longitudinal flight control design with handling quality requirements, Technical Report EPM-RT-2005-01, 2005, École Polytechnique de Montréal.Google Scholar
5. Saydy, L., Tits, A.L. and Abed, E.H., Guardian maps and the generalized stability of parametrized families of matrices and polynomials, Mathematics of Control, Signals and Systems, 1990, 3, pp 345–371.Google Scholar
6. Gibson, J.C., The Definition, Understanding and Design of Aircraft Handling Qualities, 1997, Delft University Press.Google Scholar
7. Hodgkinson, J., Aircraft Handling Qualities, 1999, AIAA Education Series.Google Scholar
8. Mitchell, D.G., Doman, D.B., Key, D.L., Klyde, D.H., Leggett, D.B., Moorhouse, D.J., Mason, D.H., Raney, D.L. and Schmidt, D.K., Evolution, revolution, and challenges of handling qualities, J Guidance, Control and Dynamics, January-February 2004, 27, (1), pp 12–28.Google Scholar
9. Kron, A., De Lafontaine, J. and Alazard, D., Robust 2-DOF H-infinity controller for highly flexible aircraft: design methodology and numerical results, Canadian Aeronautics and Space J, 2003, 49, (1), pp 19–29.Google Scholar
10. Puyou, G. and Chiappa, C., A multiobjective method for flight control law design, 2004, AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit, Providence, RI, USA, 16-19 August 2004, pp 1–11.Google Scholar
11. Tokutake, H., Sato, M. and Satoh, A., Robust flight controller design that takes into account handling quality, J Guidance, Control and Dynamics, January-February 2005, 28, (1), pp 71–77.Google Scholar
12. Etkin, B. and Reid, L.D., Dynamics of Flight: Stability and Control, 1996, John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
13. McLean, D., Automatic Flight Control Systems, 1990, Prentice Hall International (UK) Ltd.Google Scholar
14. McRuer, D., Ashkenas, I. and Dunstan, G., Aircraft Dynamics and Automatic Control, 1973, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
15. Tischler, M.B., Advances in Aircraft Flight Control, 1996, Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
16. Field, E., The application of a C * flight control law to a large civil transport aircraft, Technical Report No 9303, 1993, College of Aeronautics, Cranfield Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
17. US Department of Defense. Flying Qualities of Piloted Aircraft, 1997, MIL-HDBK-1797, Washington: Government Printing Office, USA.Google Scholar