Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-p5m67 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-29T13:52:22.157Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Optimal load limiting parachute inflationcontrol

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

J. Redmond ,
G. G. Parker  and
T. D. Hinnerichs
J. Redmond
Affiliation:
Sandia National LaboratoriesAlbuquerque, USA
G. G. Parker
Affiliation:
Sandia National LaboratoriesAlbuquerque, USA
T. D. Hinnerichs
Affiliation:
Sandia National LaboratoriesAlbuquerque, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Excessive deceleration forces experienced during highspeed deployment of parachute systems can causedamage to the payload and the canopy fabric.Conventional reefing lines offer limited relief bytemporarily restricting canopy inflation andlimiting the peak deceleration load. However, theopen-loop control provided by existing reefingdevices restricts their use to a specific set ofdeployment conditions. The sensing, processing, andactuation which are characteristic of adaptivestructures form the basis of three concepts foractive control of parachute inflation. These activecontrol concepts are incorporated into a computersimulation of parachute inflation. Initialinvestigations indicate that these concepts promiseenhanced performance as compared to conventionaltechniques for a nominal release. Furthermore, theability of each controller to adapt to off-nominalrelease conditions is examined.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 99 , Issue 987 , September 1995 , pp. 306 - 312
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1995 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1. Laeferty, J.F. and Lange, K.O. The University of Kentucky continuous disreefing device, Wright Air Development Center Technical Note 58-177, May 1959.Google Scholar
2. Webb, D.B. Development and initial test results of parachutes with automatic inflation modulation, Proceedings of the AIAA 6th Aero dynamic Decelerator and Balloon Technology Conference, March 1979, pp 363-374.Google Scholar
3. Webb, D.B. Further test results of parachutes with automatic inflation modulation, Proceedings of the SAFE 18th Annual Symposium of the Survival and Flight Equipment Association, October 1981, pp 116-123.Google Scholar
4. Webb, D.B. Automatic inflation modulation parachute up-date, Survival and Flight Equipment J, 1986, 16, (2), pp 38–45.Google Scholar
5. Hennings, L.J. Rapid — The design of a low-altitude parachute, Proceedings of the AIAA 11th Aerodynamic Decelerator Systems Technology Conference, April 1991, pp 408-420.Google Scholar
6. Lee, C.K. Radial reefing method for accelerated and controlled parachute opening, Proceedings of the AIAA 12th Aerodynamic Decelerator Systems Technology Conference, May 1993, pp 62-71.Google Scholar
7. Macha, J.M. A simple approximate model of parachute inflation, Proceedings of the AIAA 12th Aerodynamic Decelerator Systems Technology Conference, May 1993, pp 44-53.Google Scholar
8. Macha, J.M. Development and experimental verification of a single-degree-of-freedom inflation model for ribbon and ringslot parachutes, Sandia National Laboratories Report SAND92-1378, Albuquerque, NM, October 1992.Google Scholar
9. Hopper, M.J. Harwell Subroutine Library, AERE-R9185, UKAEA, Harwell, Oxon, UK.Google Scholar