Hostname: page-component-7f64f4797f-6fdxz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-03T09:38:01.130Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pilot modelling and inverse simulation for initial handling qualities assessment

Part of: 75 year anniversary of Aeronautical Engineering at Glasgow University

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

N. Cameron ,
D. G. Thomson  and
D. J. Murray-Smith
N. Cameron
Affiliation:
Department of Engineering, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
D. G. Thomson
Affiliation:
Department of Aerospace Engineering, University of Glasgow , Glasgow, UK
D. J. Murray-Smith
Affiliation:
Department of Electronics and Electrical Engineering, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper describes the development of an approach to handling qualities investigation that can be applied at an early stage in t he design of the vehicle. It makes use of inverse simulation techniques, together with a pilot model to provide an integrated description of the man-machine control system. In order to incorporate pilot effects into data generated by inverse simulation, the output from an inverse simulation run is applied as input to a closed-loop system model that includes the vehicle dynamics and a simple parametric model of the pilot. Parameters of the pilot model are determined by optimisation and the pilot effect is added to the system output. Validation of the approach is achieved through a case study involving a predefined mission task involving a lateral manoeuvre. Equalisation characteristics estimated for each pilot are compared with those found by inverse simulation for the same manoeuvre. This approach may be applied using a simple real-time simulation on a desk-top computer and could be of value in identifying any potential deficiencies in a helicopter flight control system at an early stage in its development

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 107 , Issue 1074: University of Glasgow 50th year anniversary special , August 2003 , pp. 511 - 520
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2003 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1. Thomson, D.G. and Bradley, R. The development and verification of an algorithm for helicopter inverse simulation, Vertica, May 1990, 14, 2, pp 185–200.Google Scholar
2. Tustin, A. An investigation of the operator's response in manual control of a power driver gun. Metropolitan-Vickers Electrical Co Limited, Sheffield, CS Memo no 169, 1944.Google Scholar
3. Wilde, R.W. and Westcott, J.H. The characteristics of the human operator engaged in a tracking task, automatica, 1993 1, pp 5–19. 1993.Google Scholar
4. McRuer, D.T. and Krendel, E.S. Dynamic response of the human operator, Wright Patterson AFB, Ohio, Tech. Report 56 - 524, October 1957.Google Scholar
5. McRuer, D.T. and Krendel, E.S. Mathematical models of human pilot Behaviour, AGARD-AG-188, January 1974.Google Scholar
6. Pausder, H.J. and Jordan, D. Handling qualities evaluation of helicopters with different stability and control characteristics, Vertica, 1, 1976, pp 125–134.Google Scholar
7. Anon, Aeronautical design standard ADS-33D. Handling qualities specifications for military rotorcraft. United States Army Aviation and Troop Command, St Louis, Mo, Directorate for Engineering, July 1994.Google Scholar
8. Padfield, G.D., Jones, J.P., Charlton, M.T., Howell, S.E. and Bradley, R. Where does the workload go when the pilot attacks the manoeuvre? Paper 83, Proceedings of the 20th European Rotorcraft Forum, October 1994.Google Scholar
9. Grace, A. Optimisation toolbox for use with MATLAB, The Math Works, November 1992.Google Scholar