Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-20T03:11:45.510Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Putting a value on noise

The development of an index which is fair to both airport operators and the public

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

E. J. Richards*
Affiliation:
Institute of Sound and Vibration Research, University of Southampton

Extract

Problems of noise at airports have now been with us for over a quarter of a century and in many ways the situation seems to be more acute than ever before. The promise of new and better sited national airports has receded to such an extent that all that remains is a vague threat of the need to find a cheaper but less environmentally suitable site, and an exhortation to permit added traffic to operate from existing airports, even though the local communities have expressed their displeasure most forcefully. The introduction of the Concorde, unlikely as it is to always meet the old noise rules, let alone the new ones, makes a mockery of those operators who are willing and have striven to accept a policy of progressive reductions of noise limits, and the present governmental tardiness to proceed with plans for retrofit will add to this unwillingness.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1976 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Wilson, A. Noise, Final Report, Comnd. 2056. HMSO, London 1963.Google Scholar
2. Schultz, T. J. Community noise ratings, Applied Science Publishers Ltd, London.Google Scholar
3. Ollerhead, J. B. Estimating community annoyance due to airport noise. Loughborough University of Technology Report, T.T.7203, 1972.Google Scholar
4. Department of Trade, Airport strategy for Great Britain, Part I, The London Area. HMSO 1975.Google Scholar
5. Edwards, R. M. and Ollerhead, J. B. A survey of air craft noise annoyance in an area of invariant noise, to eliminate the effects in annoyance of varying noife ex posure. Loughborough University of Technology Report, T.T.7405, 1974.Google Scholar
6. Richards, E. J. The noise environment in the United Kingdom. Journal of the Society of Environmental Engineers, March 1973.Google Scholar
7. Department of the Environment. Maplin Airport: The choice of sites for runways. Dept. of the Environment, April 1972.Google Scholar
8. Deva-Aditya, N. J. and Ollerhead, J. B. Criteria for assessing the acceptability of airport noise nuisance. Vol. 2, Application of social justice principles. Loughborough University Report, T.T.7503.Google Scholar
9. Richards, E. J. The cost of airport noise. New Scientist, 24th September 1970.Google Scholar
10. Roskill Commission. Report of the Commission on the Third London Airport, HMSO 1971.Google Scholar
11. Alexandre, and Barde, . Aircraft noise charges. Noise Control Engineering. September 1974.Google Scholar
12. Ollerhead, J. B. A pilot survey of some effects of air craft noise in residential communities near London (Heathrow) Airport, Loughborough University of Tech nology Report, T.T.7302, 1973.Google Scholar
13. Richards, E. J. and Ollerhead, J. B. Noise Burden Factor—a new way of rating airport noise. Sound and Vibration, Vol. 7, No. 12, 1973.Google Scholar
14. Deva-Aditya, N. and Ollerhead, J. B. Noise burdens at US airports, Loughborough University of Technology. T.T. Report.Google Scholar
15. Deva-Aditya, N., Hooper, R. D. and Ollerhead, J. B. Noise burdens at British regional airports, Loughborough University of Technology, T.T. Report.Google Scholar
17. Richards, E. J. and Sibert, E. London (Gatwick) airport. An environmental study, Surrey County Council 1970.Google Scholar
18. Richards, E. J. Noise—this country’s most urgent pollution problem. A lesson in the quantification of airport noise, 1973.Google Scholar