Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-lqqdg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-06T07:26:13.066Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Smooth linear-parameter-varying identification of gas turbine engine models: a polynomial approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 September 2025

H. Morales Escamilla*
Affiliation:
Department of Automatic Control and Systems Engineering, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
A. R. Mills
Affiliation:
Department of Automatic Control and Systems Engineering, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
V. Kadirkamanathan
Affiliation:
Department of Automatic Control and Systems Engineering, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
D. S. Wall
Affiliation:
Rolls-Royce PLC, Bristol, UK
*
Corresponding author: H. Morales Escamilla; Email: h.m.escamilla@sheffield.ac.uk

Abstract

Interpretability and explainability are at the core of applications developed for control of safety-critical systems, requiring low-complexity models, with physically meaningful insights, and maximum prediction accuracy. This can lead to two very distinct representations of non-linear systems: models purely based on first-principles, highly explainable but extremely difficult to use in practice, or data-intensive, with almost no interpretability but tailored to each specific application. To harness the advantages of both approaches, this paper introduces a novel polynomial linear-parameter-varying framework with stability guarantees to model gas turbine engines, with interpretable dynamical states. The identification problem is split into three stages: (i) identification of the scheduling variable mapping via least squares; (ii) identification of the state dynamics via constrained least squares optimisation involving linear matrix inequalities; (iii) identification of the output equation via least squares. The modelling framework inherits interpretability through the selection of physical variables as dynamical states, while model smoothness is enforced by the use of polynomial functions, which are amenable for control design and optimisation. A unique model for the gas turbine engine is obtained at sea level static, and then extended to wider operating conditions through transformations to referred variables. The effectiveness of the modelling framework is demonstrated on two scenarios, using an engine from the literature, in which low prediction errors were observed, including avoidance of instabilities. Potential applications range from digital-twins and Monte-Carlo simulations, to gain-scheduled and model predictive control, or even economic optimisation, among others.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal Aeronautical Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

This paper is a version of a presentation given at the ISABE Conference held in 2024.

References

Walsh, P.P. and Fletcher, P. Gas turbine performance, ${2^{{\rm{nd}}}}$ Ed., 2004, Blackwell Science, Oxford.10.1002/9780470774533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imani, A. and Montazeri-Gh, M., Improvement of min–max limit protection in aircraft engine control: An LMI approach, Aerospace Science and Technology, 2017, 68, pp 214222.10.1016/j.ast.2017.05.017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imani, A. and Montazeri-Gh, M., A min–max multiregulator system with stability analysis for aeroengine propulsion control, ISA Transactions, 2019, 85, pp 8496.10.1016/j.isatra.2018.10.035CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Austin Spang, H. III and Brown, H., Control of jet engines, Control Engineering Practice, 1999, 7, (9), pp 10431059.10.1016/S0967-0661(99)00078-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montazeri-Gh, M., Rasti, A., Jafari, A., and Ehteshami, M., Design and implementation of MPC for turbofan engine control system, Aerospace Science and Technology, 2019, 92, pp 99113.10.1016/j.ast.2019.05.061CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, A., Harbour, S., and Cohen, K., Toward airworthiness certification for artificial intelligence (AI) in aerospace systems, 2022 IEEE/AIAA 41st Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC), 2022, Portsmouth, VA, USA, pp 110.10.1109/DASC55683.2022.9925740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Overschee, P. and De Moor, B., Subspace identification for linear systems: Theory-Implementation-Applications, Springer, 1996, New York, US.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sohlberg, B. and Jacobsen, E., Grey box modelling - branches and experiences, IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 2008, 41, (2), pp 1141511420.10.3182/20080706-5-KR-1001.01934CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearson, R.K., Selecting nonlinear model structures for computer control, Journal of Process Control, 2003, 13, pp 126.10.1016/S0959-1524(02)00022-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaw, L.C. and Mattingly, J.D. Aircraft engine controls. Design, system analysis and health monitoring, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2009, Reston, Virginia.10.2514/4.867057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shamma, J.S. An overview of LPV systems, in control of linear parameter varying systems with applications, Springer, 2012, New York.Google Scholar
Bamieh, B., Giarré, L., Raimondi, T., Bauso, D., Lodato, M., and Rosa, D., LPV model identification for the stall and surge control of a jet engine, IFAC Proceeding Volumes, 2001, 34, (15), pp 105110.10.1016/S1474-6670(17)40712-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bamieh, B. and Giarré, L. Identification of linear parameter varying models, Proceedings of the 38th Conference on Decision & Control, Phoenix, Arizona USA, 1999, pp 15051510.10.1109/CDC.1999.830205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balas, G.J., Linear parameter-varying control and its application to a turbofan engine, International Journal of Robust Nonlinear Control, 2002, 12, pp 763796.10.1002/rnc.704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jia, Q., Shi, X., Li, H., Han, X. and Xiao, H., Multivariable robust gain scheduled LPV control synthesis of turbofan engine, 2017 8th International Conference on Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering (ICMAE), Prague, Czech Republic.Google Scholar
Bamieh, B. and Giarré, L. Identification of linear parameter varying models, International Journal of Robust Nonlinear Control, 2002, 12, pp 841853.10.1002/rnc.706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Q. and Ljung, L. From structurally independent local LTI models to LPV model, Automatica, 2017, 84, pp 232235.10.1016/j.automatica.2017.06.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacy, S.L. and Bernstein, S. Subspace identification with guaranteed stability using constrained optimization, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 2003, 48, (7), pp 12591263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, J.W. and Litt, J.S. Control design for an advanced geared turbofan engine, 53rd AIAA/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference, AIAA Propulsion and Energy Forum, (AIAA 2017-4820), 2017.10.2514/6.2017-4820CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samar, R. and Postlethwaite, I. Multivariable controller design for a high performance aero-engine, 1994 International Conference on Control - Control ’94, Coventry, UK, 1994.10.1049/cp:19940326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahmood, S., Griffin, I.A., Fleming, P.J., and Shutler, A.J. Inverse model control of a three spool gas turbine engine, GT2005 ASME Turbo Expo 2005: Power for Land, Sea and Air, Reno-Tahoe, Nevada, USA, 2005.Google Scholar
Biswas, B.N., Chatterjee, S., Mukherjee, S.P. and Pal, S. A discussion on Euler method: a review, Electronic Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 2013, 1, (2), pp 294317.Google Scholar
Söderström, T., System identification, Prentice Hall, 1989, New York.Google Scholar
Scherer, C., Gahinet, P., and Chilali, M. Multiobjective output-feedback control via LMI optimization, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 1997, 42, (7), pp 896911.10.1109/9.599969CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petersen, K.B. and Pedersen, M.S. The matrix cookbook, 2006, Technical University of Denmark.Google Scholar
g, X. The effect of regularization coefficient on polynomial regression, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2019, 1213, (4), 042054. Google Scholar
Ebihara, Y., Peaucelle, D., and Arzelier, D. S-variable approach to LMI-based robust control, Springer-Verlag, 2015, London.10.1007/978-1-4471-6606-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar