Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T09:44:21.642Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Variable-speed tail rotors for helicopters with variable-speed main rotors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 February 2017

D. Han  and
G. N. Barakos
D. Han*
Affiliation:
National Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Rotorcraft Aeromechanics, College of Aerospace Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing Jiangsu, China
G. N. Barakos
Affiliation:
CFD Laboratory, School of Engineering, James Watt South Building, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, ScotlandUK
*
donghan@nuaa.edu.cn
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Variable tail rotor speed is investigated as a method for reducing tail rotor power, and improving helicopter performance. A helicopter model able to predict the main rotor and tail rotor powers is presented, and the flight test data of the UH-60A helicopter is used for validation. The predictions of the main and tail rotor powers are generally in good agreement with flight tests, which justifies the use of the present method in analysing main and tail rotors. Reducing the main rotor speed can result in lower main rotor power at certain flight conditions. However, it increases the main rotor torque and the corresponding required tail rotor thrust to trim, which then decreases the yaw control margin of the tail rotor. In hover, the tail rotor may not be able to provide enough thrust to counter the main rotor torque, if it is slowed to follow the main rotor speed. The main rotor speed corresponding to the minimum main rotor power increases, if the change of tail rotor power in hover is considered. As a helicopter translates to cruise, the induced power decreases, and the profile power increases, with the profile power dominating the tail rotor. Reducing the tail rotor speed in cruise reduces the profile power to give a 37% reduction in total tail rotor power and a 1.4% reduction to total helicopter power. In high-speed flight, varying the tail rotor speed is ineffective for power reduction. The power reduction obtained by the variable tail rotor speed is reduced for increased helicopter weight.

Keywords

Tail rotormain rotorvariable speedpower
Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 121 , Issue 1238 , April 2017 , pp. 433 - 448
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Prouty, R.W. Should we consider variable rotor speeds?, Vertiflite, 2004, 50, (4), pp 24–27.Google Scholar
2. Steiner, J., Gandhi, F. and Yoshizaki, Y. An investigation of variable rotor RPM on performance and trim, American Helicopter Society 64th Annual Forum Proceedings, 29 April-1 May 2008, Montreal, Canada.Google Scholar
3. Diottavio, J. and Friedmann, D. Operational benefit of an optimal, widely variable speed rotor, American Helicopter Society 66th Annual Forum Proceedings, 11-13 May 2010, Phoenix, Arizona, US.Google Scholar
4. Kang, H., Saberi, H. and Grandhi, F. Dynamic blade shape for improved helicopter rotor performance, J American Helicopter Soc, 2010, 55, (3), pp 032008.Google Scholar
5. Mistry, M. and Gandhi, F. Helicopter performance improvement with variable rotor radius and RPM, J American Helicopter Soc, 2014, 59, (4), pp 042010.Google Scholar
6. Horn, J.F. and Guo, W. Flight control design for rotorcraft with variable rotor speed, American Helicopter Society 64th Annual Forum Proceedings, 29 April-1 May 2008, Montreal, Canada.Google Scholar
7. Guo, W. and Horn, J. F. Helicopter flight control with variable rotor speed and torque limiting, American Helicopter Society 65th Annual Forum Proceedings, 27-29 May, 2009, Grapevine, Texas, US.Google Scholar
8. Misté, G.A., Benini, E., Garavello, A. and Gonzalez-Alcoy, M. A methodology for determining the optimal rotational speed of a variable RPM main rotor/turboshaft engine system, J American Helicopter Soc, 2015, 60, (3), pp 032009.Google Scholar
9. Lewicki, D.G., Desmidt, H., Smith, E.C. and Bauman, S.W. Two speed gearbox dynamic simulation predictions and test validation, American Helicopter Society 66th Annual Forum Proceedings, 11-13 May 2010, Phoenix, Arizona, US.Google Scholar
10. Saribay, Z.B., Smith, E.C., Lemanski, A.J., Bill, R.C., Wang, K.-W. and Rao, S. Compact pericyclic continuously variable speed transmission systems: Design features and high-reduction variable speed case studies, American Helicopter Society 63rd Annual Forum Proceedings, 1-3 May 2007, Virginia Beach, Virginia, US.Google Scholar
11. Yeo, H., Bousman, W.G. and Johnson, W. Performance analysis of a utility helicopter with standard and advanced rotors, J American Helicopter Soc, 2004, 49, (3), pp 250–270.Google Scholar
12. Peters, D.A. and Haquang, N. Dynamic inflow for practical application, J American Helicopter Soc, 1988, 33, (4), pp 64–68.Google Scholar
13. Leishman, J.G. Principles of Helicopter Aerodynamics, 2nd ed., 2006, Cambridge University Press, New York, US, pp 202–209.Google Scholar
14. Padfield, G.D. Helicopter Flight Dynamics: The Theory and Application of Flying Qualities and Simulation Modelling, 2nd ed., 2007, Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Oxford, UK, pp 142–146.Google Scholar
15. Lynn, R.R., Robinson, F.D., Batra, N.N. and Duhon, J.M. Tail rotor design part I: Aerodynamics, J American Helicopter Soc, 1970, 15, (4), pp 2–15.Google Scholar
16. Hilbert, K.B. A mathematical model of the UH-60 helicopter, NASA-TM-85890, 1984, Moffett Field, California, US.Google Scholar
17. Buckanin, R.M., Herbst, M.K., Lockwood, R.A., Skinner, G.L. and Sullivan, P.J. Airworthiness and flight characteristics test of a sixth year production UH-60A, USAAEFA Project No. 83-24, June 1985, California, US.Google Scholar
18. Nagata, J.I., Piotrowski, J.L., Young, C.J., Lewis, W.D., Losier, P.W. and Lyle, J.A. Baseline performance verification of the 12th year productionUH-60A black hawk helicopter, USAAEFA Project No. 87-32, January 1989, California, US.Google Scholar