Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-21T01:37:42.010Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Aerodynamic and Thermodynamic Effects of Coolant Injection on Axial Compressors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 June 2016

P. G. Hill
Get access

Summary

A study has been made of the effects of inlet coolant injection upon axial compressor performance, using the results of tests on turboshaft engines. It is shown that evaporation of the coolant changes the stage work distribution as well as the ideal compression work and that these effects may be estimated by elementary thermodynamic methods. Simplified prediction procedures are suggested and compared with experimental results.

Type
Research Article
Information
Aeronautical Quarterly , Volume 14 , Issue 4 , November 1963 , pp. 331 - 348
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society. 1963

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Smith, C. W. Aircraft Gas Turbines. Wiley, New York, 1956.Google Scholar
2. Horlock, J. H. A Rapid Method for Calculation of the Off-Design Performance of Compressors and Turbines. Aeronautical Quarterly, Vol. IX, p. 346, November 1958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Mellor, G. L. and Root, T. Generalised Multi-Stage Axial Compressor Characteristics. ASME Paper 61-Hyd-14. Presented at the ASME-EIC Hydraulic Conference, Montreal,. Canada, 7th-8th May 1961.Google Scholar
4. Nukiyama, S. and Tanasawa, Y. Papers on Drop Size Distribution in Sprays. Transactions of the Society of Mechanical Engineers (Japan), Vol. 4, No. 14, p. 86, 1938; Vol. 5, No. 15, p. 138, 1939; Vol. 6, No. 18, pp. 63 and 68, No. 22, Chapter II, p. 7, No. 23, Chapter II, p. 8, 1940. See also: Mugele, R. A. and Evans, H. D. Drop Size Distribution in Sprays. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, Vol. 43, No. 6, pp. 1317–1324, 1951.Google Scholar