Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Dynamics and Uncertainty in Land Use Conversion for Perennial Energy Crop Production: Exploring Effects of Payments for Ecosystem Services Policies

  • Xiaogu Li and Katherine Y. Zipp

Abstract

Perennial energy crops like switchgrass that are used for biofuel production have the potential to generate various water quality benefits such as reduced nitrogen runoff. Yet the current expected returns to switchgrass are not profitable enough for these crops to be widely adopted by U.S. farmers due to relatively unstable yields, volatile revenues, and high costs of crop establishment. This study uses a dynamic economic model to investigate the uncertainties in the yields and costs of switchgrass production, in comparison with those of corn-soybeans in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed in Pennsylvania. Results indicate that farmers would be willing to convert corn-soybeans to switchgrass land use with the provision of payments for ecosystem services (PES). A targeted PES policy based on the environmental effectiveness of the crop land is found to be slightly more effective in providing nitrogen reductions than a uniform PES policy with cost savings of 8–19%. Moreover, switchgrass has the potential of providing energy supply while reducing greenhouse gases emissions.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Dynamics and Uncertainty in Land Use Conversion for Perennial Energy Crop Production: Exploring Effects of Payments for Ecosystem Services Policies
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Dynamics and Uncertainty in Land Use Conversion for Perennial Energy Crop Production: Exploring Effects of Payments for Ecosystem Services Policies
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Dynamics and Uncertainty in Land Use Conversion for Perennial Energy Crop Production: Exploring Effects of Payments for Ecosystem Services Policies
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Corresponding author

Correspondence: Xiaogu Li ■ Department of Agricultural Economics ■ Sociology ■ and EducationPennsylvania State UniversityUniversity Park301 ArmsbyUniversity Park ■ PA 16802 ■ Email: xql5271@psu.edu

References

Hide All
Babcock, B.A., Gassman, P.W., Jha, M.J., and Kling, C.L.. 2007. “Adoption Subsidies and Environmental Impacts of Alternative Energy Crops.” Center for Agricultural and Rural Development, Iowa State University. CARD Briefing Paper, 7. Available at https://www.agmrc.org/media/cms/CARD07BP_50_5B82C507B559C.pdf (accessed January 2017).
Bocqueho, G., and Jacquet, F.. 2010. “The Adoption of Switchgrass and Miscanthus by Farmers: Impact of Liquidity Constraints and Risk Preferences.” Energy Policy 38(5): 25982607.
Camargo, G.G., Ryan, M.R., and Richard, T.L.. 2013. “Energy use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Crop Production Using the Farm Energy Analysis Tool.” BioScience 63(4): 263273.
Chesapeake Bay Commission. 2012. Nutrient Credit Trading for the Chesapeake Bay: An Economic Study. Available at http://www.chesbay.us/Publications/nutrient- trading-2012.pdf (accessed January 2017).
Chesapeake Community Modeling Program. (n.d.). HSPF Phase 5 Data Library: Watershed Delineation and GIS Data. Available at http://ches.communitymodeling.org/models/CBPhase5/datalibrary/watershed-GIS- data.php (accessed March 2018).
Chesapeake Bay Program. 2017. Chesapeake Progress - 2017 and 2025 Watershed Implementation Plans (WIPs). Available at http://www.chesapeakeprogress.com/clean-water/watershed-implementation-plans (accessed January 2017).
Clancy, D., Breen, J.P., Thorne, F., and Wallace, M.. 2012. “The Influence of a Renewable Energy Feed in Tariff on the Decision to Produce Biomass Crops in Ireland.” Energy Policy 41: 412421.
Clements, T., John, A., Nielsen, K., An, D., Tan, S., and Milner-Gulland, E.J.. 2010. “Payments for Biodiversity Conservation in the Context of Weak Institutions: Comparison of Three Programs from Cambodia.” Ecological Economics 69(6): 12831291.
Daly, C., Halbleib, M., Hannaway, D., and Eaton, L.. 2017. “Environmental Limitation Mapping of Potential Biomass Resources across the Conterminous United States.” Global Climate Change Biology-Bioenergy 10: 118.
Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control. 2011. Socioeconomic Value of the Chesapeake Bay Watershed in Delaware. Report prepared by Kauffman, G., Homsey, A., McVey, E., Mack, S., and Chatterson, S.. Available at http://www.delawarewatersheds.org/publications (accessed March 2018).
Di Pardo, J (2004). Outlook for biomass ethanol production and demand. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration. Available at http://www.ethanol-gec.org/information/briefing/6.pdf (accessed February 2017).
Di Virgilio, N., Monti, A., and Venturi, G.. 2007. “Spatial Variability of Switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) Yield as Related to Soil Parameters in a Small Field.” Field Crops Research 101(2): 232239.
English, B.C., Ugarte, D.L.T., Walsh, M.E., Hellwinckel, C.M., and Menard, R.J.. 2006. “Economic Competitiveness of Bioenergy Production and Effects on Agriculture of the Southern Region.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 38(02): 389402.
Environmental Finance Center University of Maryland. 2016. Options for Financing Chesapeake Bay Restoration in Pennsylvania. Available at https://www.chesapeakebay.net/documents/Options_for_Financing_Bay_Restoratio n_in_PA_Nov_2016.pdf (accessed March 2018).
Fackler, P. 2004. Solving optimal switching models. Unpublished paper. Retrieved from http://www4. ncsu. edu/~ pfackler/compecon (accessed January 2017).
Fike, J.H., Parrish, D.J., Wolf, D.D., Balasko, J.A., Green, J.T., Rasnake, M., and Reynolds, J.H.. 2006. “Long-term Yield Potential of Switchgrass-for-Biofuel Systems.” Biomass and Bioenergy 30(3): 198206.
Havlík, P., Schneider, U.A., Schmid, E., Böttcher, H., Fritz, S., Skalský, R., Aoki, K., et al. 2011. “Global Land-use Implications of First and Second Generation Biofuel Targets.” Energy Policy 39(10): 56905702.
Hill, J., Nelson, E., Tilman, D., Polasky, S., and Tiffany, D.. 2006. “Environmental, Economic, and Energetic Costs and Benefits of Biodiesel and Ethanol Biofuels.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 103(30): 1120611210.
Jin, H., Larson, E.D., and Celik, F.E.. 2009. “Performance and Cost Analysis of Future, Commercially Mature Gasification-based Electric Power Generation from Switchgrass.” Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining 3(2): 142173.
Krasuska, E., and Rosenqvist, H.. 2012. “Economics of Energy Crops in Poland Today and in the Future.” Biomass and Bioenergy 38: 2333.
Kort, J., Collins, M., and Ditsch, D.. 1998. “A Review of Soil Erosion Potential Associated with Biomass Crops.” Biomass and Bioenergy, 14(4): 351359.
Lee, D., Owens, V., and Doolittle, J.. 2007. “Switchgrass and Soil Carbon Sequestration Response to Ammonium Nitrate, Manure, and Harvest Frequency on Conservation Reserve Program Land.” Agronomy Journal 99(2): 462468.
Lubowski, R.N., Vesterby, M., Bucholtz, S., Baez, A., and Roberts, M. J.. 2006. “Major Uses of Land in the United States, 2002.USDA ERS Economic Information Bulletin 14. Washington, DC: USDA ERS.
MATLAB (software). 2015. User's Guide (R2015a). Natick, MA: MathWorks. Inc.
Miranda, M., and Fackler, P.. 2004. Applied Computational Economics and Finance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Mueller, S.A., Anderson, J.E., and Wallington, T.J.. 2011. “Impact of Biofuel Production and Other Supply and Demand Factors on Food Price Increases in 2008.” Biomass and Bioenergy 35(5): 16231632.
Nebraska Energy Office. 2016. Fuel Ethanol Average Rack Prices F.O.B. Omaha, Nebraska, 19822016. Available at http://www.neo.ne.gov/statshtml/66.html (accessed November 2016).
Penn State Extension. 2014. NEWBio Switchgrass Budget for Biomass Production. Available at http://extension.psu.edu/publications/ee0095 (accessed February 2017).
Pennsylvania State Government. 2016. Pennsylvania Unveils Comprehensive Strategy to Improve Water Quality in state and Chesapeake Bay Watershed. Available at http://www.media.pa.gov/pages/Agriculture_details.aspx?newsid=385 (accessed October 2017).
Qin, X., Mohan, T., El-Halwagi, M., Cornforth, G., and McCarl, B.A.. 2006. “Switchgrass as an Alternate Feedstock for Power Generation: An Integrated Environmental, Energy and Economic Life-cycle Assessment.” Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy 8(4): 233249.
Rephann, T.J. 2010. Economic impacts of implementing agricultural best management practices to achieve goals outlined in Virginia's tributary strategy. Center for Economic and Policy Studies, University of Virginia. Available at https://ceps.coopercenter.org/sites/ceps/files/BMP_paper_final.pdf (accessed February 2017).
Shortle, J., Kaufman, Z., Abler, D., Harper, J., Hamlett, J., and Royer, M.. 2013. “Building Capacity to Analyze the Economic Impacts of Nutrient Trading and Other Policy Approaches for Reducing Agriculture's Nutrient Discharge into the Chesapeake Bay Watershed Executive Summary.” USDA Office of the Chief Economist. Available at https://www.usda.gov/oce/environmental_markets/files/EconomicTradingCBay.pdf (accessed February 2017).
Song, F., Zhao, J., and Swinton, S.M.. 2011. “Switching to Perennial Energy Crops under Uncertainty and Costly Reversibility.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 93(3): 764779.
Sweeney, J. (2017). Phase 6 Model: Scenarios, E3 Update, and Schedule. In WQGIT Meeting. Retrieved from https://www.chesapeakebay.net/channel_files/25275/sweeney_wqgit_phase6scenari os_6-26-17.pdf
Thomson, A.M., Izarrualde, R.C., West, T.O., Parrish, D.J., Tyler, D.D., and Williams, J.R.. 2009. Simulating Potential Switchgrass Production in the United States.PNNL- 19072. Richland, WA: Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL). Available at https://www.pnnl.gov/main/publications/external/technical_reports/PNNL- 19072.pdf (accessed February 2017).
Ugarte, D., English, B., Jensen, K.L., Hellwinckel, C., Menard, J., and Wilson, B.. 2006. “Economic and Agricultural Impacts of Ethanol and Biodiesel Expansion.” in Agricultural Economics Study Report, University of Tennessee. Available at http://www.ethanol-gec.org/information/Ethanolagimpacts.pdf (accessed February 2017).
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). 2011. Biomass Crop Assistance Program Fact Sheet. Available at https://www.fsa.usda.gov/Internet/FSA_File/bcap_areas2_5_2011.pdf (accessed March 2018).
USDA. 2016. Northern Crescent Corn Yield Data. Available at http://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/commodity-costs-and-returns/commodity- costs-and-returns (accessed November 2016).
USDA. 2017. Quick Stats database, National Agricultural Statistics Service. Available at https://quickstats.nass.usda.gov (accessed December 2016).
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2009. Planting and managing switchgrass as a biomass energy crop, Technical Note 3. Available at https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/stelprdb1042293.pdf (accessed November 2017).
United States Department of Energy (USDOE). 2007. Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Alternative Fuels Data Center. Available at http://www.afdc.energy.gov/fuels (accessed November 2016).
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2010. Chesapeake Bay Total Maximum Daily Load for Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Sediment. Available at https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2014- 12/documents/bay_tmdl_executive_summary_final_12.29.10_final_1.pdf (accessed February 2017).
Woodbury, P., Howarth, R., and Steinhart, G.. 2008. “Understanding Nutrient Cycling and Sediment Sources in the Upper Susquehanna River Basin.” Journal of Contemporary Water Research and Education 138: 714.
Woodbury, P., Kemanian, A., Jacobson, M., and Langholtz, M.. 2017. Improving Water Quality in the Chesapeake Bay using Payment for Ecosystem Services for Perennial Biomass Production.Biomass and Bioenergy. Available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.01.024 (accessed February 2017).
Wullschleger, S.D., Davis, E.B., Borsuk, M.E., Gunderson, C.A., and Lynd, L.R.. 2010. “Biomass production in switchgrass across the United States: database description and determinants of yield.” Agronomy Journal, 102(4): 11581168.
Wunder, S. 2007. “The Efficiency of Payments for Environmental Services in Tropical Conservation.” Conservation Biology 21(1): 4858.
Zilberman, D., Hochman, G., Rajagopal, D., Sexton, S., and Timilsina, G.. 2012. “The impact of biofuels on commodity food prices: Assessment of findings.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 95(2): 275281.

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed