Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-kcxw8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-20T01:49:18.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Impact of Four Alternative Policies to Decrease Soda Consumption

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2016

Yizao Liu*
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics at University of Connecticut
Rigoberto A. Lopez
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics at University of Connecticut
Chen Zhu
Affiliation:
College of Economics and Management at China Agricultural University
*
Correspondence: Yizao LiuDepartment of Agricultural and Resource EconomicsUniversity of Connecticut1376 Storrs Road, Unit 4021Storrs, CT 06269-4021Phone 860.486.1923 ▪ Email yizao.liu@uconn.edu.

Abstract

We examine the impact of four policy options on consumption of carbonated soft drinks (CSDs) by estimating a random-coefficient discrete-choice model of demand. Policy simulations using demand estimates indicate that the impacts of banning television advertising, limiting container size, and limiting calories on total consumption would be similar—an estimated 15.40–15.75 percent reduction. However, limiting calories would have a significantly greater impact on consumption of regular CSDs (–28.89 percent) and on calories consumed from CSDs (–19.34 percent). A tax on calories was least effective in curtailing overall consumption and consumption of regular CSDs.

Information

Type
Selected Papers
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable