Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T21:49:19.129Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Payments under the Average Crop Revenue Program: Implications for Government Costs and Producer Preferences

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2016

Joseph Cooper
Joseph Cooper*
Affiliation:
Economic Research Service (ERS) of the U.S. Department of Agriculture in Washington, D.C.
Get access

Abstract

This paper develops a stochastic model for comparing payments to U.S. corn producers under the U.S. Senate's Average Crop Revenue Program (ACR) versus payments under the price-based marketing loan benefit and countercyclical payment programs. Using this model, the paper examines the sensitivity of the density function for payments to changes in expected price levels. We also assess the impact of the choice of yield aggregation used in the ACR payment rate on the mean and variance of farm returns. We find that ACR payments lower the producer's coefficient of variation of total revenue more than does the price-based support, although ACR may not raise mean revenue as much. While corn farmers in the heartland states might still prefer to receive the traditional forms of support when prices are low relative to statutory loan rates and target prices, this outcome is not necessarily the case for farmers in peripheral production regions.

Keywords

domestic supportcounter-cyclical paymentsrevenuepricecornyieldpairs bootstrapkernel densitycombinatorial optimization
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Agricultural and Resource Economics Review , Volume 38 , Issue 1 , April 2009 , pp. 49 - 64
Copyright
Copyright © 2009 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anton, J., and Mouel, C. Le 2004. “Do Counter-Cyclical Payments in the 2002 U.S. Farm Act Create Incentives to Produce?” Agricultural Economics 31(2/3): 277–284.Google Scholar
Babula, R., Rupple, F., and Bessler, D. 1995. “U.S. Corn Exports: The Role of the Exchange Rate.” Agricultural Economics 3(2): 75–148.Google Scholar
Charmpis, D., and Panteli, P. 2004. “A Heuristic Approach for the Generation of Multivariate Random Samples with Specified Marginal Distributions and Correlation Matrix.” Computational Statistics 19(2): 283–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deng, X., Barnett, B., and Vedenov, D. 2007. “Is There a Viable Market for Area-Based Crop Insurance?” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 89(2): 508–519.Google Scholar
Economic Research Service (ERS). 2007. “Agricultural Exchange Rate Data Set.” ERS, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C. (March 2007 update).Google Scholar
Efron, B. 1979. “Bootstrap Methods: Another Look at the Jackknife.” Annals of Statistics 7(1): 1–26.Google Scholar
Efron, B. 1987. “Better Bootstrap Confidence Intervals.” Journal of the American Statistics Association 82(397): 171–185.Google Scholar
Farm Services Agency (FSA). 2006a. “Direct and Counter-Cyclical Program 1-DCP Amendment 38.” FSA, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C. (August 4).Google Scholar
Farm Services Agency (FSA). 2006b. “Direct and Counter-Cyclical Payment Program.” Fact Sheet, FSA, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C. (March).Google Scholar
Fenton, V., and Gallant, A. 1996. “Qualitative and Asymptotic Performance of SNP Density Estimators.” Journal of Econometrics 74(1): 77–118.Google Scholar
Goodwin, B. 2002. “Modeling Price and Yield Risk.” In Just, R. and Pope, R., eds., A Comprehensive Assessment of the Role of Risk in Agriculture. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
Goodwin, B.K., and Ker, A.P. 1998. “Nonparametric Estimation of Crop-Yield Distributions: Implications for Rating Group-Risk Crop Insurance Contracts.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 80(1): 139–153.Google Scholar
Goodwin, B., and Mishra, A. 2006. “Are ‘Decoupled’ Farm Program Payments Really Decoupled? An Empirical Evaluation.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 88(1): 73–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Härdle, W. 1990. Applied Nonparametric Regression. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hennessy, D. 1998. “The Production Effects of Agricultural Income Support Policies Under Uncertainty.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 80(1): 46–57.Google Scholar
Lahiri, S. 1999. “Theoretical Comparison of Block Bootstrap Methods.” Annals of Statistics 27(1): 386–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lapp, J., and Smith, V. 1992. “Aggregate Sources of Relative Price Variability among Agricultural Commodities.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 74(1): 1–9.Google Scholar
Paulson, N., and Babcock, B. 2007. “Get a GRIP: Should Area Revenue Coverage Be Offered through the Farm Bill or as a Crop Insurance Program?” CARD Working Paper No. 07-WP-440, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD), Iowa State University, Ames, IA.Google Scholar
Sckokai, P., and Moro, D. 2006. “Modeling the Reforms of the Common Agricultural Policy for Arable Crops under Uncertainty.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 88(1): 43–56.Google Scholar
Silverman, B.W. 1986. Density Estimation. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Tomek, W., and Gray, R. 1970. “Temporal Relationships Among Prices on Commodity Futures Markets: Their Allocative and Stabilizing Roles.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 52(3): 372–380.Google Scholar
Yatchew, A. 1998. “Nonparametric Regression Techniques in Economics.” Journal of Economic Literature 36(2): 669–721.Google Scholar