This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.
M.A. Cliff , M.C. Dever , J.W. Hall , and B. Giraud . 1996. “Development and Evaluation of Multiple Regression Models for Predicting Sweet Cherry Liking.” Food Research International 28(6): 583–589.
C.H. Crisosto , G.M. Crisosto , and P. Metheney . 2003. “Consumer Acceptance of ‘Brooks’ and ‘Bing’ Sweet Cherries Is Mainly Dependent on Fruit SSC and Visual Skin Color.” Postharvest Biology and Technology 28(1): 159–167.
D.E. Guyer , N.K. Sinha , T.S. Chang , and J.N. Cash . 1993. “Physiochemical and Sensory Characteristics of Selected Michigan Sweet Cherry (Prunus avium L.) Cultivars.” Journal of Food Quality 16(5): 355–370.
J.J. Louviere , D.A. Hensher , and J.D. Swait . 2000. Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Application. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
J.L. Lusk , J. Roosen , and J.A. Fox . 2003. “Demand for Beef from Cattle Administered Growth Hormones or Fed Genetically Modified Corn: A Comparison of Consumers in France, Germany, the United Kingdom, and United States.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 85(1): 16–29.
J.L. Lusk , and T.C. Schroeder . 2004. “Are Choice Experiments Incentive Compatible? A Test with Quality Differentiated Beef Steaks.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 86(2): 467–482.
E. Ouma , A. Abdulai , and A. Drucker . 2007. “Measuring Heterogeneous Preferences for Cattle Traits amongst Cattle Keeping Households in East Africa.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 89(4): 1005–1019.
K.E. Train 2003. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.