Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-ksp62 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-07T09:22:16.347Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

CADSYN: A case-based design process model

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2009

Mary Lou Maher  and
Dong Mei Zhang
Mary Lou Maher
Affiliation:
Department of Architectural and Design Science, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
Dong Mei Zhang
Affiliation:
Department of Architectural and Design Science, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In solving a new design problem, the case-based reasoning paradigm provides a process model where previous experience in the form of multiple, individual design situations can be used in a new design context. Design synthesis presents challenges to current methodologies of CBR in the application of the various approaches to case memory organization, indexing, selection and transformation. The focus of this paper is on the transformation process. Multiple types of design knowledge are essential to derive a new design solution. A hybrid case-based design process model, CADSYN, is proposed to integrate specific design situations and generalized domain knowledge, where specific cases are represented as attribute-value pairs and domain knowledge is represented by generalized design concepts and constraints. Case transformation is treated as a constraint satisfaction problem, where a specific design case provides a starting point for a new design problem and constraints are used to revise the case for consistency with the new context.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
AI EDAM , Volume 7 , Issue 2 , May 1993 , pp. 97 - 110
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Collin, Z., Dechter, R. et al. 1991. On the feasibility of distributed constraint satisfaction. In Proceedings of International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-91), Sydney, Australia, pp 318–324.Google Scholar
Dechter, R. 1990. Enhancement schemes for constraint processing: backjumping, learning, and cutset decomposition. Artificial Intelligence Journal 41(3), 273–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freuder, E. C. 1978. Synthesising constraint expressions. Communications of the ACM 21(11),958–966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goel, A. and Chandrasekaren, B. 1989. Use of device models in adaptation of design cases. In Proceedings of the DARPA Workshop on Case-Based Reasoning. Pensacola Beach, Florida. pp 100–109.Google Scholar
Hinrichs, T. R. and Kolodner, J. L. 1991. The roles of adaptation in case-based design. In Proceedings of the DARPA Workshop on Case-Based Reasoning. Washington, D.C. pp 121–132.Google Scholar
Hua, K., Schmitt, G. and Faltings, B. 1992. Adaptation of spatial design cases. In Artificial Intelligence In Design '92. Gero, J. S. ed. Kluwer Academic, Amsterdam, pp 559–575.Google Scholar
Mackworth, A. K. 1977. Consistency in networks of relations. Artificial Intelligence 8, 99–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maher, M. L. 1987. Engineering design synthesis: a domain independent representation. Al EDAM 1(3), 207–213.Google Scholar
Maher, M. L. and Zhang, D. M. 1991. CADSYN: using case and decomposition knowledge for design synthesis. In Artificial Intelligence in Design '91, Gero, J. S., ed. Butterworth-Heinemann: Oxford, pp 137–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montanari, U. 1974. Networks of constraints: fundamental properties and applications to picture processing. Information Science 7, 95–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, H. A. 1973. The structure of ill structured problems. Artificial Intelligence 4, 181–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sycara, K. P. and Navinchandra, D. 1989. Integrated case-based reasoning and qualitative reasoning in engineering design. In Artificial Intelligence in Design, Gero, J. S., ed. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 231–250.Google Scholar
Sycara, K. P., Navinchandra, D. and Narasimhan, S. 1992. Parametric adaptation case-based design. In Proceedings of Case-Based Design Workshop of Artificial Intelligence in Design '92. Pittsburgh, PA.Google Scholar
Wang, J. and Howard, H. C. 1991. A design-dependent approach to integrated structural design. In Artificial Intelligence in Design '91. Gero, J. S., ed. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, pp 151–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahao, F. and Maher, M. L. 1988. Using analogical reasoning to design buildings. Engineering With Computers 4, 107–119.Google Scholar