Skip to main content Accessibility help

Case-based reasoning and system design: An integrated approach based on ontology and preference modeling

  • Juan Camilo Romero Bejarano (a1) (a2), Thierry Coudert (a2), Elise Vareilles (a3), Laurent Geneste (a2), Michel Aldanondo (a3) and Joël Abeille (a2)...

This paper addresses the fulfillment of requirements related to case-based reasoning (CBR) processes for system design. Considering that CBR processes are well suited for problem solving, the proposed method concerns the definition of an integrated CBR process in line with system engineering principles. After the definition of the requirements that the approach has to fulfill, an ontology is defined to capitalize knowledge about the design within concepts. Based on the ontology, models are provided for requirements and solutions representation. Next, a recursive CBR process, suitable for system design, is provided. Uncertainty and designer preferences as well as ontological guidelines are considered during the requirements definition, the compatible cases retrieval, and the solution definition steps. This approach is designed to give flexibility within the CBR process as well as to provide guidelines to the designer. Such questions as the following are conjointly treated: how to guide the designer to be sure that the requirements are correctly defined and suitable for the retrieval step, how to retrieve cases when there are no available similarity measures, and how to enlarge the research scope during the retrieval step to obtain a sufficient panel of solutions. Finally, an example of system engineering in the aeronautic domain illustrates the proposed method. A testbed has been developed and carried out to evaluate the performance of the retrieval algorithm and a software prototype has been developed in order to test the approach. The outcome of this work is a recursive CBR process suitable to engineering design and compatible with standards. Requirements are modeled by means of flexible constraints, where the designer preferences are used to express the flexibility. Similar solutions can be retrieved even if similarity measures between features are not available. Simultaneously, ontological guidelines are used to guide the process and to aid the designer to express her/his preferences.

Corresponding author
Reprint requests to: Thierry Coudert, ENIT, 47 Avenue d'azereix, 65016 Tarbes Cedex, France. E-mail:
Hide All
Aamodt, A., & Plaza, E. (1994). Case-based reasoning: foundational issues, methodological variations, and system approaches. AI Communications 7(1), 3952.
Abeille, J., Coudert, T., Vareilles, É., Geneste, L., Aldanondo, M., & Roux, T. (2010). Formalization of an integrated system/project design framework: first models and processes. In Complex Systems and Management (Aiguier, M., Bretaudeau, F., & Krob, D., Eds.), pp. 207217. Berlin: Springer.
Althoff, K.-D., & Weber, R. (2005). Knowledge management in case-based reasoning. Knowledge Engineering Review 20(3), 305310.
Altshuller, G. (1996). And Suddenly the Inventor Appeared: Triz, the Theory of Inventive Problem Solving. Worcester, MA: Technical Innovation Center.
Armaghan, N., & Renaud, J. (2012). An application of multi-criteria decision aids models for case-based reasoning. Information Sciences 210, 5566.
Avramenko, Y., & Kraslawski, A. (2006). Similarity concept for case-based design in process engineering. Computers & Chemical Engineering 30(3), 548557.
Batet, M., Sánchez, D., & Valls, A. (2011). An ontology-based measure to compute semantic similarity in biomedicine. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 44(1), 118125.
Benferhat, S., Dubois, D., Kaci, S., & Prade, H. (2006). Bipolar possibility theory in preference modeling: representation, fusion and optimal solutions. Information Fusion 7(1), 135150.
Bergmann, R. (2002). Experience Management: Foundations, Development Methodology, and Internet-Based Applications. Berlin: Springer.
Brandt, S.C., Morbach, J., Miatidis, M., Theißen, M., Jarke, M., & Marquardt, W. (2008). An ontology-based approach to knowledge management in design processes. Computers & Chemical Engineering 32(1–2), 320342.
Cao, D., Li, Z., & Ramani, K. (2011). Ontology-based customer preference modeling for concept generation. Advanced Engineering Informatics 25(2), 162176.
Chandrasegaran, S.K., Ramani, K., Sriram, R.D., Horvth, I., Bernard, A., Harik, R.F., & Gao, W. (2013). The evolution, challenges, and future of knowledge representation in product design systems. Computer-Aided Design 45(2), 204228.
Chang, X., Sahin, A., & Terpenny, J. (2008). An ontology-based support for product conceptual design. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 24(6), 755762.
Chen, X., Gao, S., Guo, S., & Bai, J. (2012). A flexible assembly retrieval approach for model reuse. Computer-Aided Design 44(6), 554574.
Chen, Y.-J., Chen, Y.-M., Chu, H.-C., & Kao, H.-Y. (2008). On technology for functional requirement-based reference design retrieval in engineering knowledge management. Decision Support Systems 44(4), 798816.
Chenouard, R., Granvilliers, L., & Sebastian, P. (2009). Search heuristics for constraint-aided embodiment design. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 23, 175195.
Cordi, V., Lombardi, P., Martelli, M., & Mascardi, V. (2005). An ontology-based similarity between sets of concepts. In Proc. Workshop dagli Oggetti agli Agenti (WOA) (Corradini, F., Paoli, F.D., Merelli, E., & Omicini, A., Eds.), pp. 1621. Bologna: Pitagora Editrice.
Cordier, A., Mascret, B., & Mille, A. (2009). Extending case-based reasoning with traces. In Grand Challenges for Reasoning from Experiences, workshop at IJCAI'09.
Cortes-Robles, G., Negny, S., & Le-Lann, J.M. (2009). Case-based reasoning and TRIZ: a coupling for innovative conception in chemical engineering. Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification 48(1), 239249.
Coudert, T., Vareilles, É., Aldanondo, M., Geneste, L., & Abeille, J. (2011). Synchronization of system design and project planning: integrated model and rules. 5th IEEE Int. Conf. Software, Knowledge, Information, Industrial Management and Applications (SKIMA' 2011), pp. 16.
Coudert, T., Vareilles, É., Geneste, L., Aldanondo, M., & Abeille, J. (2011). Proposal for an integrated case based project planning. In Complex Systems Design and Management (Hammami, O., Krob, D., & Voirin, J.-L., Eds.), pp. 133144. Berlin: Springer.
Dalkir, K. (2005). Knowledge Management in Theory and Practice. Amsterdam: Elsevier/Butterworth Heinemann.
Darlington, M.J., & Culley, S.J. (2008). Investigating ontology development for engineering design support. Advanced Engineering Informatics 22(1), 112134.
Dieter, G. (2000). Engineering Design: A Materials and Processing Approach. New York: McGraw–Hill.
Domshlak, C., Hüllermeier, E., Kaci, S., & Prade, H. (2011). Preferences in AI: an overview. Artificial Intelligence 175(7–8), 10371052.
Dubois, D., Esteva, F., Garcia, P., Godo, L., de Mantaras, R.L., & Prade, H. (1997). Fuzzy modelling in case-based reasoning and decision. Proc. ICCBR-97, Case-Based Reasoning Research and Development (Leake, D.B., & Plaza, E., Eds.), pp. 599610. New York: Springer–Verlag.
Dubois, D., Fargier, H., & Prade, H. (1996). Possibility theory in constraint satisfaction problems: handling priority, preference and uncertainty. Applied Intelligence 6(4), 287309.
Dubois, D., Prade, H., Esteva, F., Garcia, P., Godo, L., & Lopez de Mantaras, R. (1998). Fuzzy set modelling in case-based reasoning. International Journal of Intelligent Systems 13(4), 345373.
Faure, A., & Bisson, G. (1999). Modeling the experience feedback loop to improve knowledge base reuse in industrial environment. In 12th Workshop on Knowledge Acquisition, Modeling and Management, KAW 99. Banff, Canada.
Finnie, G.R., & Sun, Z. (2003). R5 model for case-based reasoning. Knowledge-Based Systems 16(1), 5965.
Foguem, B.K., Coudert, T., Béler, C., & Geneste, L. (2008). Knowledge formalization in experience feedback processes: an ontology-based approach. Computers in Industry 59(7), 694710.
Gao, C., Huang, K., Chen, H., & Wang, W. (2006). Case-based reasoning technology based on TRIZ and generalized location pattern. Journal of TRIZ in Engineering Design 2, 4058.
Gelle, E., Faltings, B., Clément, D.E., & Smith, I.F.C. (2000). Constraint satisfaction methods for applications in engineering. Engineering With Computers (London) 16(2), 8195.
Gero, J.S. (1990). Design prototypes: a knowledge representation schema for design. AI Magazine 11(4), 2636.
Girard, P., & Doumeingts, G. (2004). Modelling the engineering design system to improve performance. Computers and Industrial Engineering 46(1), 4367.
Goel, A.K., & Craw, S. (2006). Design, innovation and case-based reasoning. Knowledge Engineering Review 20(3), 271276.
Gomez De Silva Garza, A., & Maher, M. (1996). Design by interactive exploration using memory-based techniques. Knowledge-Based Systems 9(3), 151161.
Gu, D.-X., Liang, C.-Y., Bichindaritz, I., Zuo, C.-R., & Wang, J. (2012). A case-based knowledge system for safety evaluation decision making of thermal power plants. Knowledge-Based Systems 26, 185195.
Guo, Y., Hu, J., & Hong Peng, Y. (2012). A CBR system for injection mould design based on ontology: a case study. Computer-Aided Design 44(6), 496508.
Haskins, C. (2011). Systems Engineering Handbook: A Guide for Systems Life Cycle Processes and Activities. San Diego, CA: INCOSE.
Huang, C.-C., & Kusiak, A. (1998). Modularity in design of products and systems. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part A 28(1), 6677.
Huysentruyt, J., & Chen, D. (2010). Contribution to the development of a general theory of design. 8th Int. Conf. Modeling and Simulation, MOSIM 2010, Hammamet, Tunisia.
ISO. (2008). ISO/IEC 15288:2008. Systems and Software Engineering System Life Cycle Processes. Geneva: Author.
Jabrouni, H., Foguem, B.K., Geneste, L., & Vaysse, C. (2011). Continuous improvement through knowledge-guided analysis in experience feedback. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 24(8), 14191431.
Jabrouni, H., Kamsu-Foguem, B., & Geneste, L. (2009). Exploitation of knowledge extracted from industrial feedback processes. Proc. Software, Knowledge and Information Management and Applications, SKIMA 2009, Fes, Morocco.
Janthong, N., Brissaud, D., & Butdee, S. (2010). Combining axiomatic design and case-based reasoning in an innovative design methodology of mechatronics products. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology 2(4), 226239.
Junker, U., & Mailharro, D. (2003). Preference programming: advanced problem solving for configuration. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 17(1), 1329.
Kam, C., & Fischer, M. (2004). Capitalizing on early project decision-making opportunities to improve facility design, construction, and life-cycle performance-POP, PM4D, and decision dashboard approaches. Automation in Construction 13(1), 5365.
Kim, K.-Y., Manley, D.G., & Yang, H. (2006). Ontology-based assembly design and information sharing for collaborative product development. Computer-Aided Design 38(12), 12331250.
Kolb, D.A. (1984). Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development. Journal of Organizational Behavior 8, 359360.
Kolodner, J. (1993). Case-Based Reasoning. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
Lau, A.S.M., Tsui, E., & Lee, W.B. (2009). An ontology-based similarity measurement for problem-based case reasoning. Expert Systems With Applications 36(3), 65746579.
Leake, D., & McSherry, D. (2005). Introduction to the special issue on explanation in case-based reasoning. Artificial Intelligence Review 24(2), 103108.
Lee, K., & Luo, C. (2002). Application of case-based reasoning in die-casting die design. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 20, 284295.
Liu, D.-R., & Ke, C.-K. (2007). Knowledge support for problem-solving in a production process: a hybrid of knowledge discovery and case-based reasoning. Expert Systems With Applications 33(1), 147161.
Liu, H.-W. (2005). New similarity measures between intuitionistic fuzzy sets and between elements. Mathematical and Computer Modelling 42(12), 6170.
Macedo, L., & Cardoso, A. (1998). Nested graph-structured representations for cases. Proc. 4th European Workshop on Advances in Case-Based Reasoning (EWCBR-98) (Smyth, B., & Cunningham, P. Eds.), LNAI, Vol. 1488, pp. 112. Berlin: Springer.
Maher, M.-L., & Gomez de Silva Garza, A. (1997). Case-based reasoning in design. IEEE Expert 12(2), 3441.
Martin, J.N. (2000). Processes for engineering a system: an overview of the ansi/eia 632 standard and its heritage. Systems Engineering 3(1), 126.
Mileman, T., Knight, B., Petridis, M., Cowell, D., & Ewer, J. (2002). Case-based retrieval of 3-dimensional shapes for the design of metal castings. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 13, 3945.
Mok, C., Hua, M., & Wong, S. (2008). A hybrid case-based reasoning CAD system for injection mould design. International Journal of Production Research 46(14), 37833800.
Mondragon, C.C., Mondragon, A.C., Miller, R., & Mondragon, E C. (2009). Managing technology for highly complex critical modular systems: the case of automotive by-wire systems. International Journal of Production Economics 118(2), 473485.
Montanari, U. (1974). Networks of constraints: fundamental properties and application to picture processing. Information Science 7, 95132.
Nanda, J., Thevenot, H.J., Simpson, T.W., Stone, R.B., Bohm, M., & Shooter, S.B. (2007). Product family design knowledge representation, aggregation, reuse, and analysis. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 21(2), 173192.
Negny, S., & Le-Lann, J. (2008). Case-based reasoning for chemical engineering design. Chemical Engineering Research and Design 86(6), 648658.
Negny, S., Riesco, H., & Lann, J.-M.L. (2010). Effective retrieval and new indexing method for case based reasoning: application in chemical process design. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 23(6), 880894.
Pahl, G., & Beitz, W. (1984). Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach. Berlin: Springer.
Policastro, C.A., de Carvalho, A.C.P.L.F., & Delbem, A.C.B. (2006). Automatic knowledge learning and case adaptation with a hybrid committee approach. Journal of Applied Logic 4(1), 2638.
Policastro, C.A., de Carvalho, A.C.P.L.F., Delbem, A.C.B. (2008). A hybrid case adaptation approach for case-based reasoning. Applied Intelligence 28(2), 101119.
Qin, X., & Regli, W. (2003). A study in applying case-based reasoning to engineering design: mechanical bearing design. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 17(3), 235252.
Rakoto, H., Hermosillo-Worley, J., & Ruet, M. (2002). Integration of experience based decision support in industrial processes. IEEE Int. Conf. Systems, Man and Cybernetics, SMC'02. Hammamet, Tunisia.
Richards, D., & Simoff, S.J. (2001). Design ontology in context—a situated cognition approach to conceptual modelling. Artificial Intelligence in Engineering 15(2), 121136.
Ruet, M., & Geneste, L. (2002). Search and adaptation in a fuzzy object oriented case base. Proc. 6th European Conf. Case Based Reasoning, LNAI, Vol. 2416, pp. 350364. Berlin: Springer.
Saridakis, K., & Dentsoras, A. (2007). Case-desc: a system for case-based design with soft computing techniques. Expert Systems With Applications 32(2), 641657.
Settouti, L.S., Prié, Y., Marty, J.-C., & Mille, A. (2009). A trace-based system for technology-enhanced learning systems personalisation. Proc. 9th IEEE Int. Conf. Advance Learning Technologies, pp. 93–97.
Simon, H. (1969). The Sciences of the Artificial. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Stahl, A., & Bergmann, R. (2000). Applying recursive CBR for the customization of structured products in an electronic shop. Advances in Case-Based Reasoning (Blanzieri, E., & Portinale, L. Eds.), LNCS, Vol. 1898, pp. 297308. Berlin: Springer.
Studer, R., Benjamins, V.R., & Fensel, D. (1998). Knowledge engineering: principles and methods. Data & Knowledge Engineering 25(1–2), 161197.
Suh, N.P. (1990). The Principles of Design. New York: Oxford University Press.
Sun, Z., Han, J., & Dong, D. (2008). Five perspectives on case based reasoning. Advanced Intelligent Computing Theories and Applications: With Aspects of Artificial Intelligence (Huang, D.-S., Wunsch, D.C., Levine, D., & Jo, K.-H., Eds.), LNSC, Vol. 5227, pp. 410419. Berlin: Springer.
Tang, M. (1997). A knowledge-based architecture for intelligent design support. International Journal of Knowledge Engineering Review 12(4), 387460.
Thornton, A.C. (1996). The use of constraint-based design knowledge to improve the search for feasible designs. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 9(4), 393402.
Ullman, D. (2003). The Mechanical Design Process. New York: McGraw–Hill Higher Education.
Uschold, M., & Gruninger, M. (1996). Ontologies: principles, methods and applications. Knowledge Sharing and Review 11(2), 93155.
Vareilles, E., Aldanondo, M., de Boisse, A.C., Coudert, T., Gaborit, P., & Geneste, L. (2012). How to take into account general and contextual knowledge for interactive aiding design: towards the coupling of csp and cbr approaches. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 25(1), 3147.
Wang, J., Tang, M., & Gabrys, B. (2006). An agent-based system supporting collaborative product design. Knowledge-Based Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems (Heidelberg, S.-V.B., Ed.), LNAI, Vol. 4252, Part II, pp. 670677. Berlin: Springer.
Wang, W.-J. (1997). New similarity measures on fuzzy sets and on elements. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 85(3), 305309.
Weber, R., Aha, D.W., & Becerra-Fernandez, I. (2001). Intelligent lessons learned systems. Expert System Applications 20(1), 1734.
Woon, F.L., Knight, B., Petridis, M., & Patel, M.K. (2005). CBE-conveyor: a case-based reasoning system to assist engineers in designing conveyor systems. Case-Based Reasoning Research and Development (Muñoz-Avila, H., & Ricci, F., Eds.), LNCS, Vol. 3620, pp. 640651. Berlin: Springer.
Wu, M.-C., Lo, Y.-F., & Hsu, S.-H. (2008). A fuzzy cbr technique for generating product ideas. Expert Systems With Applications 34(1), 530540.
Wu, Z., & Palmer, M. (1994). Verb semantics and lexical selection. Proc. 32nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 133138, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces.
Xuanyuan, S., Jiang, Z., Li, Y., & Li, Z. (2011). Case reuse based product fuzzy configuration. Advanced Engineering Informatics 25(2), 193197.
Yang, C., & Chen, J. (2011). Accelerating preliminary eco-innovation design for products that integrates case-based reasoning and TRIZ method. Journal of Cleaner Production 19, 9981006.
Zarandi, M.F., Razaee, Z.S., & Karbasian, M. (2011). A fuzzy case based reasoning approach to value engineering. Expert Systems With Applications 38(8), 93349339.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

  • ISSN: 0890-0604
  • EISSN: 1469-1760
  • URL: /core/journals/ai-edam
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed