Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Function-based, biologically inspired concept generation

  • Jacquelyn K.S. Nagel (a1), Robert L. Nagel (a2), Robert B. Stone (a1) and Daniel A. McAdams (a3)
Abstract

The natural world provides numerous cases for inspiration in engineering design. Biological organisms, phenomena, and strategies, which we refer to as biological systems, provide a rich set of analogies. These systems provide insight into sustainable and adaptable design and offer engineers billions of years of valuable experience, which can be used to inspire engineering innovation. This research presents a general method for functionally representing biological systems through systematic design techniques, leading to the conceptualization of biologically inspired engineering designs. Functional representation and abstraction techniques are used to translate biological systems into an engineering context. The goal is to make the biological information accessible to engineering designers who possess varying levels of biological knowledge but have a common understanding of engineering design. Creative or novel engineering designs may then be discovered through connections made between biology and engineering. To assist with making connections between the two domains concept generation techniques that use biological information, engineering knowledge, and automatic concept generation software are employed. Two concept generation approaches are presented that use a biological model to discover corresponding engineering components that mimic the biological system and use a repository of engineering and biological information to discover which biological components inspire functional solutions to fulfill engineering requirements. Discussion includes general guidelines for modeling biological systems at varying levels of fidelity, advantages, limitations, and applications of this research. The modeling methodology and the first approach for concept generation are illustrated by a continuous example of lichen.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Agrawal, S.K. (2007). Sparrow flapping wing micro air vehicle. Accessed at http://mechsys4.me.udel.edu/research/birdproject/
Ahmadjian, V. (1993). The Lichen Symbiosis. Waltham, MA: Blaisdell Publishing.
Balazs, M.E., & Brown, D.C. (2001). Design simplification by analogical reasoning. In Knowledge Intensive Computer Aided Design (Rizzi, C., Cugini, U., & Wozny, M.J., Eds.). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
Bar-Cohen, Y. (2006 a). Biomimetics—using nature to inspire human innovation. Journal of Bioinspiration and Biomimetics 1(1), 112.
Bar-Cohen, Y. (2006 b). Biomimetics Biologically Inspired Technologies. Boca Raton, FL: CRC/Taylor & Francis.
Bhatta, S.R., & Goel, A.K. (1997). An analogical theory of creativity in design. Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. Case Based Reasoning Research and Development, pp. 565574, LNCS Vol. 1266. Berlin: Springer.
Birnbaum, L., Colling, G., Brand, M., Freed, M., Krulwich, B., & Pryor, L. (1991). A model-based approach to the construction of adaptive case-based planning systems. Proc. Case-Based Reasoning Workshop (Bareiss, R., Ed.), pp. 391397. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
Bohm, M., Vucovich, J., & Stone, R. (2008). Using a design repository to drive concept generation. Journal of Computer and Information Science in Engineering 8(1), 14502.
Brebbia, C.A. (Ed.). (2006). Proc. 3rd Int. Conf., Design and Nature III: Comparing Design in Nature With Science and Engineering. Southampton: Wessex Institute of Technology.
Brebbia, C.A., & Collins, M.W. (Eds). (2004). Proc. 2nd Int. Conf., Design and Nature II: Comparing Design in Nature With Science and Engineering. Southampton: Wessex Institute of Technology.
Brebbia, C.A., Sucharov, L.J., & Pascolo, P. (Eds.). (2002). Proc. 1st Int. Conf., Design and Nature I: Comparing Design in Nature With Science and Engineering. Southampton: Wessex Institute of Technology.
Brodo, I.M., Sharnoff, S.D., & Sharnoff, S. (2001). Lichens of North America. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Bryant, C., McAdams, D., Stone, R., Kurtoglu, T., & Campbell, M. (2005). A computational technique for concept generation. Proc. ASME 2005 IDETC/CIE Conf., Long Beach, CA.
Bryant, C., Stone, R., McAdams, D., Kurtoglu, T., & Campbell, M. (2005). Concept generation from the functional basis of design. Proc. Int. Conf. Engineering Design, Melbourne, Australia.
Campbell, N.A., & Reece, J.B. (2003). Biology. San Francisco, CA: Pearson Benjamin Cummings.
Casakin, H. (2006). Assessing the use of metaphors in the design process. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 33(2), 253268.
Casakin, H. (2007). Metaphors in design problem solving: implications for creativity. International Journal of Design 1(2), 2133.
Chakrabarti, A., Sarkar, P., Leelavathamma, B., & Nataraju, B.S. (2005). A functional representation for aiding biomimetic and artificial inspiration of new ideas. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 19, 113132.
Cheong, H., Shu, L.H., Stone, R.B., & McAdams, D.A. (2008). Translating terms of the functional basis into biologically meaningful words. Proc. ASME 2008 Design Engineering Technical Conf. Computers and Information in Engineering Conf., New York.
Chiu, I., & Shu, L.H. (2007 a). Biomimetic design through natural language analysis to facilitate cross-domain information retrieval. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 21(1), 4559.
Chiu, I., & Shu, L.H. (2007 b). Using language as related stimuli for concept generation. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 21(2), 103121.
Cross, N. (1996). Creativity in design: not leaping but bridging. In Creativity and Cognition (Candy, L., & Edmonds, E., Eds.), pp. 2735. Loughborough: Loughborough University.
Cutherell, D. (1996). Product architecture. In The PDMA Handbook of New Product Development (Rosenau, M. Jr., Ed.). New York: Wiley.
De Mantaras, R.L., & Plaza, E. (1997). Case-based reasoning: an overview. AI Communications 10(1), 2129.
Dieter, G. (1991). Engineering Design: A Materials and Processing Approach. New York: McGraw–Hill.
Erden, M.S., Komoto, H., Beek, T.J.V., D'Amelio, V., Echavarria, E., & Tomiyama, T. (2008). A review of functional modeling: approaches and applications. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 22, 147169.
Forbes, P. (2006). The Gecko's Foot: Bio-Inspiration: Engineering New Materials From Nature. New York: W.W. Norton.
French, M.J. (1994). Invention and Evolution Design in Nature and Engineering. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Gentner, D. (1983). Structure-mapping: a theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science 7, 155170.
Gentner, D. (1988). Analogical inference and access. In Analogica (Prieditis, A., Ed.), LNCS Vol. 230. Los Altos, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
Gick, M., & Holyoak, K. (1980). Analogical problem-solving. Cognitive Psychology 12, 306355.
Goel, A. (1997). Design, analogy and creativity. IEEE Expert Intelligent Systems and Their Applications 12(3), 6270.
Goel, A., & Chandrasekaran, B. (1988). Integrating model-based reasoning with case based reasoning for design problem solving. Proc. AAAI-88 Workshop on AI in Design, Minneapolis, MN.
Gordon, W.J.J. (1961). Synectics, the Development of Creative Capacity. New York: Harper.
Haas, J., Aaronson, J.S., & Overton, G.C. (1993). Analogical reasoning for knowledge discovery in a molecular biology database. Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. Information and Knowledge Management, pp. 554564. New York: ACM.
Helms, M., Vattam, S.S., & Goel, A.K. (2009). Biologically inspired design: products and processes. Design Studies 30(5), 606622.
Henderson, I.F., & Lawrence, E. (2005). Henderson's Dictionary of Biology. Essex: Pearson Education.
Hey, J., Linsey, J., Agogino, A.M., & Wood, K.L. (2008). Analogies and metaphors in creative design. International Journal of Engineering Education 24(2), 283294.
Hirtz, J., Stone, R., McAdams, D., Szykman, S., & Wood, K. (2002). A functional basis for engineering design: reconciling and evolving previous efforts. Research in Engineering Design 13(2), 6582.
Hofstadter, D.R. (1995). Fluid Concepts and Creative Analogies: Computer Models of the Fundamental Mechanisms of Thought. New York: Basic Books.
Kolodner, J.L., Simpson, R.L., & Sycara, K. (1985). A process model of case-based reasoning in problem solving. Proc. 9th Int. Joint Conf. Artificial Intelligence, pp. 284290.
Lindemann, U., & Gramann, J. (2004). Engineering design using biological principles. Int. Design Conference, DESIGN 2004, Dubrovnik.
Linsey, J., Wood, K., & Markman, A. (2008). Modality and representation in analogy. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 22(2), 85100.
Maher, M.L., & de Silva Garza, A.G. (1996). Developing case-based reasoning for structural design. IEEE Intelligent Systems 11(3), 4252.
Mak, T.W., & Shu, L.H. (2004). Abstraction of biological analogies for design. CIRP Annals 531(1), 117120.
Mak, T.W., & Shu, L.H. (2008). Using descriptions of biological phenomena for idea generation. Research in Engineering Design 19(1), 2128.
Matrin, E., & Hine, R.S. (2000). Oxford Dictionary of Biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
McAdams, D., & Wood, K. (2000). Quantitative measures for design by analogy. Proc. ASME 2000 Design Engineering Technical Conf. Computers and Information in Engineering Conf., Paper No. DETC2000/DTM-14562. New York: ASME.
Miles, L. (1961). Techniques of Value Analysis and Engineering. New York: McGraw–Hill.
Nagel, J.K.S., Stone, R.B., & McAdams, D.A. (2010). An engineering-to-biology thesaurus for engineering design. Proc. ASME 2010 IDETC/CIE Conf., Montreal.
Nagel, R., Perry, K., Stone, R., & McAdams, D. (2009). FunctionCAD: an open source functional modeling application based on the function design framework. Proc. ASME 2009 IDETC/CIE Conf., San Diego, CA.
Nagel, R., Tinsley, A., Midha, P., McAdams, D., Stone, R., & Shu, L. (2008). Exploring the use of functional models in biomimetic design. Journal of Mechanical Design 130(12), 1123.
Nash, T.H. (2008). Lichen Biology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Otto, K.N., & Wood, K.L. (2001). Product Design: Techniques in Reverse Engineering and New Product Development. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice–Hall.
Pahl, G., Beitz, W., Feldhusen, J., & Grote, K.H. (2007). Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach. Berlin: Springer–Verlag.
Prince, G.M. (1967). The operational mechanism of synectics. Journal of Creative Behavior 2(1), 113.
Prince, G.M. (1970). The Practice of Creativity. New York: Collier Books.
Raven, P.H., & Johnson, G.B. (2002). Biology. Boston: McGraw–Hill.
Sarkar, P., Phaneendra, S., & Chakrabarti, A. (2008). Developing engineering products using inspiration from nature. Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering 8(3), 19.
Shu, L.H., Stone, R.B., McAdams, D.A., & Greer, J.L. (2007). Integrating function-based and biomimetic design for automatic concept generation. Proc. Int. Conf. Engineering Design, Paris.
Slade, S. (1991). Case-based reasoning: a reseach paradigm. AI Magazine 12(1), 4255.
Srinivasan, V., & Chakrabarti, A. (2009 a). SAPPhIRE—an approach to analysis and synthesis. Proc. 3rd Symp. Research in Product Design, Centre for Product Design and Manufacturing, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India.
Srinivasan, V., & Chakrabarti, A. (2009 b). SAPPhIRE—an approach to analysis and synthesis. Proc. Int. Conf. Engineering Design, Stanford, CA.
Stone, R., & Wood, K. (2000). Development of a functional basis for Design. Journal of Mechanical Design 122(4), 359370.
Stroble, J.K., Stone, R.B., McAdams, D.A., Goeke, M.S., & Watkins, S.E. (2009). Automated retrieval of non-engineering domain solutions to engineering problems. Proc. CIRP Design Conf. 2009, pp. 7885.
Stroble, J.K., Watkins, S.E., Stone, R.B., McAdams, D.A., & Shu, L.H. (2008). Modeling the cellular level of natural sensing with the functional basis for the design of biomimetic sensor technology. Proc. IEEE Region 5 Technical Conf., Kansas City, MO.
Thompson, G., & Lordan, M. (1999). A review of creativity principles applied to engineering design. Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering 213(1), 1731.
Tsujimoto, K., Miura, S., Tsumaya, A., Nagai, Y., Chakrabarti, A., & Taura, T. (2008). A method for creative behavioral design based on analogy and blending from natural things. Proc. ASME 2008 IDETC/CIE, Paper No. DETC2008/DTM-49389. New York: ASME.
Ullman, D.G. (2009). The Mechanical Design Process, 4th ed.New York: McGraw–Hill.
Ulrich, K.T., & Eppinger, S.D. (2004). Product Design and Development. Boston: McGraw–Hill/Irwin.
Vakili, V., & Shu, L.H. (2007). Including functional models of biological phenomena as design stimuli. Proc. ASME 2007 IDETC/CIE, Las Vegas, NV.
Van der Spiegel, J., & Nishimura, M. (2003). Biologically inspired vision sensor for the detection of higher-level image features. Proc. IEEE Conf. Electron Devices and Solid-State Circuits.
Vattam, S., Helms, M., & Goel, A. (2008). Compound analogical design: interaction between problem decomposition and analogical transfer in biologically inspired design. Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. Design Computing and Cognition, pp. 377396. Berlin: Springer.
Vincent, J.F.V. (2004). Design in nature. In Optimisation Mechanics in Nature (Collins, M.W., Hunt, D.G., & Atherton, M.A., Eds.). Southampton: Wessex Institute of Technology.
Vincent, J.F.V., & Mann, D.L. (2002). Systematic technology transfer from biology to engineering. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London A 360, 159173.
Voland, G. (2004). Engineering by Design. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice–Hall.
Wen, H.-I., Zhang, S.-J., Hapeshi, K., & Wang, X.-F. (2008). An innovative methodology of product design from nature. Journal of Bionic Engineering 5(1), 7584.
White, R.J., Peng, G.C.Y., & Demir, S.S. (2009). Multiscale modeling of biomedical, biological, and behavioral systems (Part 1). IEEE EMBS Magazine 28(2), 1213.
Wilson, J.O., & Rosen, D. (2007). Systematic reverse engineering of biological systems. Proc. ASME 2007 Int. Design Engineering Technical Conf. Computers and Information in Engineering Conf., Las Vegas, NV.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

AI EDAM
  • ISSN: 0890-0604
  • EISSN: 1469-1760
  • URL: /core/journals/ai-edam
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed