Skip to main content

Interpretation-driven mapping: A framework for conducting search and rerepresentation in parallel for computational analogy in design

  • Kazjon Grace (a1), John Gero (a1) (a2) and Rob Saunders (a3)

This paper presents a framework for the interactions between the processes of mapping and rerepresentation within analogy making. Analogical reasoning systems for use in design tasks require representations that are open to being reinterpreted. The framework, interpretation-driven mapping, casts the process of constructing an analogical relationship as requiring iterative, parallel interactions between mapping and interpreting. This paper argues that this interpretation-driven approach focuses research on a fundamental problem in analogy making: how do the representations that make new mappings possible emerge during the mapping process? The framework is useful for both describing existing analogy-making models and designing future ones. The paper presents a computational model informed by the framework Idiom, which learns ways to reinterpret the representations of objects as it maps between them. The results of an implementation in the domain of visual analogy are presented to demonstrate its feasibility. Analogies constructed by the system are presented as examples. The interpretation-driven mapping framework is then used to compare representational change in Idiom to that in three previously published systems.

Corresponding author
Reprint requests to: Kazjon Grace, College of Computing and Informatics, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC 28223, USA. E-mail:
Hide All
Barnden, J.A., & Holyoak, K.J. (1994). Advances in Connectionist and Neural Computation Theory: Analogy, Methaphor, and Reminding. New York: Ablex.
Bhatta, S.R., & Goel, A. (1997). Learning generic mechanisms for innovative strategies in adaptive design. Journal of the Learning Sciences 6(4), 367396.
Chalmers, D.J., French, R.M., & Hofstadter, D.R. (1992). High-level perception, representation, and analogy: a critique of artificial intelligence methodology. Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 4(3), 185211.
Clancey, W.J. (1997). Situated Cognition: On Human Knowledge and Computer Representations. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Cliff, S. (1998). The English Archive of Design and Decoration. London: Thames & Hudson.
Cottingham, L.N. (1824). The Smith and Founder's Director: Containing a Series of Designs and Patterns for Ornamental Iron and Brass Work. London: Hullmandel.
Cross, A.D., Wilson, R.C., & Hancock, E.R. (1996). Genetic search for structural matching. Proc. Computer Vision ECCV'96, pp. 514525. New York: Springer.
Davies, J., & Goel, A.K. (2001). Visual analogy in problem solving. Proc. 17th Int. Joint Conf. Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 1, pp. 377–382. San Diego, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
Davies, J., & Goel, A.K. (2003). Representation issues in visual analogy. Proc. 25th Annual Conf. Cognitive Science Society. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Davies, J., Goel, A.K., & Nersessian, N.J. (2003). Visual re-representation in creative analogies. Proc. 3rd Workshop on Creative Systems: Int. Joint Conf. Artificial Intelligence, pp. 1–12. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Detterman, D.K., & Sternberg, R.J. (1993). Transfer on Trial: Intelligence, Cognition, and Instruction. New York: Ablex.
Doumas, L.A., Hummel, J.E., & Sandhofer, C.M. (2008). A theory of the discovery and predication of relational concepts. Psychological Review 115(1), 143.
Evans, T. (1964). A heuristic program to solve geometric-analogy problems. Proc. 1964 Spring Joint Computer Conf., pp. 327–338. New York: ACM Press.
Falkenhainer, B. (1990). Analogical interpretation in context. Proc. 12th Annual Conf. Cognitive Science Society, pp. 69–76. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
Falkenhainer, B., Forbus, K.D., & Gentner, D. (1986). The structure-mapping engine. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Department of Computer Science.
Falkenhainer, B., Forbus, K.D., & Gentner, D. (1989). The structure-mapping engine: algorithm and examples. Artificial Intelligence 41(1), 163.
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2003). The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind's Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books.
Forbus, K.D., Ferguson, R.W., & Gentner, D. (1994). Incremental structure-mapping. Proc. 16th Annual Conf. Cognitive Science Society, pp. 313–318. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Forbus, K.D., Gentner, D., & Law, K. (1995). MAC/FAC: a model of similarity-based retrieval. Cognitive Science 19(2), 141205.
Forbus, K., Usher, J., Lovett, A., Lockwood, K., & Wetzel, J. (2011). Cogsketch: sketch understanding for cognitive science research and for education. Topics in Cognitive Science 3(4), 648666.
French, R. (2002). The computational modeling of analogy-making. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6(5), 200205.
Garey, M.R., & Johnson, D.S. (1979). Computers and Intractability: A Guide to NPCompleteness. New York: W.H. Freeman.
Gentner, D. (1983). Structure-mapping: a theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science 7(2), 155170.
Gentner, D., & Forbus, K.D. (2011). Computational models of analogy. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science 2(3), 266276.
Gentner, D., & Holyoak, K.J. (1997). Reasoning and learning by analogy: introduction. American Psychologist 52(1), 32.
Gero, J.S. (1998). Conceptual designing as a sequence of situated acts. In Artificial Intelligence in Structural Engineering, pp. 165177. New York: Springer.
Gick, M.L., & Holyoak, K.J. (1980). Analogical problem solving. Cognitive Psychology 12(3), 306355.
Gick, M.L., & Holyoak, K.J. (1983). Schema induction and analogical transfer. Cognitive Psychology 15(1), 138.
Griffith, T.W., Nersessian, N.J., & Goel, A.K. (1996). The role of generic models in conceptual change. Proc. 18th Annual Conf. Cognitive Science Society, pp. 312–317. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Griffith, T.W., Nersessian, N.J., & Goel, A. (2000). Function-follows-form transformations in scientific problem solving. Proc. 22nd Annual Conf. Cognitive Science Society, pp. 196–201. Mahwah NJ: Erlbaum.
Hahn, U., Chater, N., & Richardson, L.B. (2003). Similarity as transformation. Cognition 87(1), 132.
Hall, R.P. (1989). Computational approaches to analogical reasoning: a comparative analysis. Artificial Intelligence 39(1), 39120.
Harpaz-Itay, Y., Kaniel, S., & Ben-Amram, E. (2006). Analogy construction versus analogy solution, and their influence on transfer. Learning and Instruction 16(6), 583591.
Hodgetts, C.J., Hahn, U., & Chater, N. (2009). Transformation and alignment in similarity. Cognition 113(1), 6279.
Hofstadter, D. (1984). The Copycat project: an experiment in nondeterminism and creative analogies. MIT Artificial Intelligence Laboratory AI Memo 755. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
Hofstadter, D.R. (2008). Fluid Concepts and Creative Analogies: Computer Models of the Fundamental Mechanisms of Thought. New York: Basic Books.
Hofstadter, D.R., & Mitchell, M. (1992). An overview of the Copycat project. In Connectionist Approaches to Analogy, Metaphor, and Case-Based Reasoning (Holyoak, K., & Barnden, J., Eds.). New York: Ablex.
Holyoak, K.J. (2012). Analogy and relational reasoning. The Oxford Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning, pp. 234259. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Holyoak, K.J., Novick, L.R., & Melz, E.R. (1994). Component Processes in Analogical Transfer: Mapping, Pattern Completion, and Adaptation. New York: Ablex.
Holyoak, K.J., & Thagard, P. (1989). Analogical mapping by constraint satisfaction. Cognitive Science 13(3), 295355.
Humbert, C. (1970). Ornamental Design: Europe, Africa, Asia, the Americas, Oceania: A Source Book with 1000 Illustrations. London: Thames & Hudson.
Kann, V. (1992). On the approximability of NP-complete optimization problems. PhD Thesis. Royal Institute of Technology Stockholm.
Koestler, A. (1967). The Act of Creation. New York: Penguin Books.
Kokinov, B., & Petrov, A. (2001). Integrating memory and reasoning in analogy-making: the AMBR model. In The Analogical Mind: Perspectives from Cognitive Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2003). Metaphors We Live By, 2nd ed.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lovett, A., Gentner, D., Forbus, K., & Sagi, E. (2009). Using analogical mapping to simulate time-course phenomena in perceptual similarity. Cognitive Systems Research 10(3), 216228.
Lovett, A., Tomai, E., Forbus, K., & Usher, J. (2009). Solving geometric analogy problems through two-stage analogical mapping. Cognitive Science 33(7), 11921231.
Mahon, B.Z., & Caramazza, A. (2008). A critical look at the embodied cognition hypothesis and a new proposal for grounding conceptual content. Journal of Physiology (Paris) 102(1), 5970.
McDermott, J. (1979). Learning to use analogies. Proc. 6th International Joint Conference Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 1, pp. 568–576. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
Penn, D.C., Holyoak, K.J., & Povinelli, D.J. (2008). Darwin's mistake: explaining the discontinuity between human and nonhuman minds. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31(2), 109130.
Petkov, G., Vankov, I., & Kokinov, B. (2011). Unifying deduction, induction, and analogy by the AMBR model. Proc. 33rd Annual Conf. Cognitive Science Society. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Qian, L., & Gero, J.S. (1996). Function–behavior–structure paths and their role in analogy-based design. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering, Design Analysis and Manufacturing 10(4), 289312.
Ramscar, M., & Yarlett, D. (2003). Semantic grounding in models of analogy: an environmental approach. Cognitive Science 27(1), 4171.
Robertson, I. (2000). Imitative problem solving: why transfer of learning often fails to occur. Instructional Science 28(4), 263289.
Schacter, D.L., Norman, K.A., & Koutstaal, W. (2000). The cognitive neuroscience of constructive memory. In False-Memory Creation in Children and Adults: Theory, Research, and Implications (Bjorklund, D.F., Ed.), pp. 129168. London: Taylor & Francis.
Sowa, J.F. & Majumdar, A.K. (2003). Analogical reasoning. In Conceptual Structures for Knowledge Creation and Communication, pp. 1636. Dresden, Germany: Springer.
Spellman, B.A., & Holyoak, K.J. (1992). If Saddam is Hitler then who is George Bush? Analogical mapping between systems of social roles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 62(6), 913.
Tan, K.-L., Ooi, B.C., & Thiang, L.F. (2003). Retrieving similar shapes effectively and efficiently. Multimedia Tools and Applications 19(2), 111134.
Turney, P.D. (2008). The latent relation mapping engine: algorithm and experiments. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research (JAIR) 33, 615655.
Visser, W. (1996). Two functions of analogical reasoning in design: a cognitive-psychology approach. Design Studies 17(4), 417434.
Wang, T., & Zhou, J. (1997). Emcss: a new method for maximal common substructure search. Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences 37(5), 828834.
Wolstencroft, J. (1989). Restructuring, reminding and repair: what's missing from models of anology. AI Communications 2(2), 5871.
Yan, J., Forbus, K.D., & Gentner, D. (2003). A theory of rerepresentation in analogical matching. Proc. 25th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 1265–1270. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

  • ISSN: 0890-0604
  • EISSN: 1469-1760
  • URL: /core/journals/ai-edam
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed