Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Overcoming design fixation: Design by analogy studies and nonintuitive findings

  • Diana P. Moreno (a1), Luciënne T. Blessing (a1), Maria C. Yang (a2), Alberto A. Hernández (a3) and Kristin L. Wood (a4)...
Abstract
Abstract

Design fixation is a phenomenon with important significance to many fields of design due to the potential negative impacts it may have in design outcomes, especially during the ideation stage of the design process. The present study aims to provide a framework for understanding, or at least probing, design fixation by presenting a review of existing defixation approaches, as well as metrics that have been employed to understand and account for design fixation. This study also describes the results of two design by analogy (DbA) methods, WordTree and SCAMPER, to overcome design fixation in an experiment that involved 97 knowledge-domain experts. The study outcomes are at least twofold: a common framework of metrics and approaches to overcome design fixation in a wide range of design problems and nonintuitive results for DbA approaches in design fixation and other related creativity metrics. The application of WordTree and SCAMPER shows that both methods yield increased novelty compared to a control, where the SCAMPER results are significantly higher than WordTree. It is also found that WordTree mitigates design fixation whereas SCAMPER appears to be ineffective for this purpose but effective to generate an increased quantity of novel ideas. These results demonstrate that both DbA methods provide de-fixation capabilities and enhance designers’ creativity during idea generation.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Reprint requests to: Diana P. Moreno, Research Unit in Engineering Science, Faculty of Science, Technology and Communication, University of Luxembourg, 6 Rue Richard Coudenhouve Kalergi, Luxembourg. E-mail: diana.moreno@uni.lu
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

P. Andersson (1994). Early design phases and their role in designing for quality. Journal of Engeering Design 5(4), 283298.

L. Ball , T. Ormerod , & N. Morley (2004). Spontaneous analogizing in engineering design: a comparative analysis of experts and novices. Design Studies 25(5), 495508.

T. Björklund (2013). Initial mental representations of design problems: differences between experts and novices. Design Studies 34(2), 135160.

N. Bonnardel (2000). Towards understanding and supporting creativity in design: analogies in a constrained cognitive environment. Knowledge-Based Systems 13(7), 505513.

A. Chakrabarti (2013). Understanding influences on engineering creativity and innovation: a biographical study of 12 outstanding engineering designers and innovators. International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation 1(1), 5668.

J. Chan , K. Fu , C. Schunn , J. Cagan , K. Wood , & K. Kotovsky (2011 a). On the benefits and pitfalls of analogies for innovative design: ideation performance based on analogical distance, commonness, and modality of examples. ASME Journal of Mechanical Design 133(8). doi:10.1115/1.4004396

B. Christensen , & C. Schunn (2005). Spontaneous access and analogical incubation effects. Creativity Research Journal 17(1–2), 207220.

B. Christensen , & C. Schunn (2007). The relationship of analogical distance to analogical function and pre-inventive structures: the case of engineering design. Memory and Cognition 35(1), 2938.

H. Christiaans , & J. Van Andel (1993). The effects of examples on the use of knowledge in a student design activity: the case of the “flying Dutchman.” Design Studies 14(1), 5874.

N. Cross (2004). Expertise in design: an overview. Design Studies 25(5), 427441.

A. Dong , & S. Sarkar (2011). Unfixing design fixation: from cause to computer simulation. Journal of Creative Behavior 45(2), 147159.

K. Dugosh , & P. Paulus (2005). Cognitive and social comparison processes in brainstorming. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 41(3), 313320.

K. Dugosh , P. Paulus , E. Roland , & H. Yang (2000). Cognitive stimulation in brainstorming. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 79(5), 722735.

K. Fu , D. Moreno , M. Yang , & K. Wood (2014). Bio-inspired design: an overview investigating open questions from the broader field of design-by-analogy. ASME Journal of Mechanical Design 136(11), 111102. doi:10.1115/1.4028289

N. Genco , K. Hölttä-Otto , & C. Seepersad (2012). An experimental investigation of the innovation capabilities of undergraduate engineering students. Journal of Engineering Education 101(1), 6081.

D. Gentner , & A. Markman (1997). Structure mapping in analogy and similarity. American Psychologist 52(1), 4556.

T. German , & H. Barrett (2005). Functional fixedness in a technologically sparse culture. Psychological Science 16(1), 15.

K. Girotra , C. Terwiesch , & K. Ulrich (2010). Idea generation and the quality of the best idea. Management Science 56(4), 591605.

B. Harris (1973). Heuristics and design. Papers in Regional Science 31(1), 314.

A. Hernández-Luna , & L. Cárdenas-Franco (1988). Optimal design of glass molds using CAD/CAE and response surface methodology techniques. Computers & Graphics 12(3), 391399.

A. Heylighen , & H. Neuckermans (2003). Learning from experience? Promises, problems and side-effects of case-based reasoning in architectural design. International Journal of Architectural Computing 1(1), 6070.

D. Jansson , & S. Smith (1991). Design fixation. Design Studies 12(1), 311.

J. Kan , & J. Gero (2008). Acquiring information from linkography in protocol studies of designing. Design Studies 29(4), 315337.

R. Keller , C. Eckert , & P. Clarkson (2009). Using an engineering change methodology to support conceptual design. Journal of Engineering Design 20(6), 571587.

J. Kolodner (1997). Educational implications of analogy: a view from case-based reasoning. American Psychology 52(1), 5766.

P. Leynes , O. Rass , & J. Landau (2008). Eliminating the memory blocking effect. Memory 16(8), 852872.

J. Linsey , E. Clauss , T. Kortoglu , J. Murphy , K. Wood , & A. Markman (2011). An experimental study of group idea generation techniques: understanding the roles of idea representation and viewing methods. ASME Journal of Mechanical Design 133(3), 031008031015. doi:10.1115/1.4003498

J. Linsey , A. Markman , & K. Wood (2012). Design by analogy: a study of the WordTree method for problem re-representation. ASME Journal of Mechanical Design 134(4), 041009.

J. Linsey , I. Tseng , K. Fu , J. Cagan , K. Wood , & C. Schunn (2010). A study of design fixation, its mitigation and perception in engineering design faculty. ASME Journal of Mechanical Design 132(4), 041003.

K. MacCrimmon , & C. Wagner (1994). Stimulating ideas through creativity software. Management Science 40(11), 15141532.

A. Markman , & K. Wood (2009). Tools for Innovation, Vol. 5. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

A. Markman , K. Wood , J. Linsey , J. Murphy , & J. Laux (2009). Supporting innovation by promoting analogical reasoning. In Tools for Innovation ( A.B. Markman , & K.L. Wood , Eds.), pp. 85103. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

D. McKerlie , & A. MacLean (1994). Reasoning with design rationale: practical experience with design space analysis. Design Studies 15(2), 214226.

D.P. Moreno , A.A. Hernandez , M.C. Yang , K.N. Otto , K. Hölttä-Otto , J.S. Linsey , & A. Linden (2014). Fundamental studies in design-by-analogy: a focus on domain-knowledge experts and applications to transactional design problems. Design Studies 35(3), 232272.

S. Oman , I. Tumer , K. Wood , & C. Seepersad (2013). A comparison of creativity and innovation metrics and sample validation through in-class design projects. Journal of Research in Engineering Design 24(1), 6592.

K. Otto , & K. Wood (1998). Product evolution: a reverse engineering and redesign methodology. Research in Engineering Design 10(4), 226243.

M. Perttula , & P. Sipilä (2007). The idea exposure paradigm in design idea generation. Journal of Engineering Design 18(1), 93102.

A. Purcell , & J. Gero (1996). Design and other types of fixation. Design Studies 17(4), 363383.

P. Rodgers , G. Green , & A. McGown (2000). Using concept sketches to track design progress. Design Studies 21(5), 451464.

N. Segers , B. De Vries , & H. Achten (2005). Do word graphs stimulate design? Design Studies 26(6), 625647.

J. Shah , S. Kulkarni , & N. Vargas-Hernandez (2000). Evaluation of idea generation methods for conceptual design: effectiveness metrics and design of experiments. Journal of Mechanical Design 122(4), 377384.

J. Shah , S. Smith , & N. Vargas-Hernandez (2003). Metrics for measuring ideation effectiveness. Design Studies 24, 111134.

G. Shostack (1982). How to design a service. European Journal of Marketing 16(1), 4961.

S. Smith , & S. Blankenship (1989). Incubation effects. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 27(4), 311314.

S. Smith , & S. Blankenship (1991). Incubation and the persistence of fixation in problem solving. American Journal of Psychology 104(1), 6187.

S. Smith , & J. Linsey (2011). A three-pronged approach for overcoming design fixation. Journal of Creative Behavior 45(2), 8391.

N. Vargas-Hernandez , J. Shah , & S. Smith (2010). Understanding design ideation mechanisms through multilevel aligned empirical studies. Design Studies 31(4), 382410.

P. Verhaegen , J. D'hondt , D. Vandevenne , S. Dewulf , & J. Duflou (2011). Identifying candidates for design-by-analogy. Computers in Industry 62(4), 446459.

W. Yan , C. Zanni-Merk , F. Rousselot , & D. Cavallucci (2013). Ontology matching for facilitating inventive de-sign based on semantic similarity and case-based reasoning. International Journal of Knowledge-Based and Intelligent Engineering Systems 17(3), 243256.

M. Yang (2009). Observations on concept generation and sketching in engineering design. Research in Engineering Design 20(1), 111.

R. Youmans (2010). The effects of physical prototyping and groupwork on the reduction of design fixation. Design Studies 32(2), 115138.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

AI EDAM
  • ISSN: 0890-0604
  • EISSN: 1469-1760
  • URL: /core/journals/ai-edam
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 11
Total number of PDF views: 90 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 332 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 24th July 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.