Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Overcoming design fixation: Design by analogy studies and nonintuitive findings

  • Diana P. Moreno (a1), Luciënne T. Blessing (a1), Maria C. Yang (a2), Alberto A. Hernández (a3) and Kristin L. Wood (a4)...
Abstract
Abstract

Design fixation is a phenomenon with important significance to many fields of design due to the potential negative impacts it may have in design outcomes, especially during the ideation stage of the design process. The present study aims to provide a framework for understanding, or at least probing, design fixation by presenting a review of existing defixation approaches, as well as metrics that have been employed to understand and account for design fixation. This study also describes the results of two design by analogy (DbA) methods, WordTree and SCAMPER, to overcome design fixation in an experiment that involved 97 knowledge-domain experts. The study outcomes are at least twofold: a common framework of metrics and approaches to overcome design fixation in a wide range of design problems and nonintuitive results for DbA approaches in design fixation and other related creativity metrics. The application of WordTree and SCAMPER shows that both methods yield increased novelty compared to a control, where the SCAMPER results are significantly higher than WordTree. It is also found that WordTree mitigates design fixation whereas SCAMPER appears to be ineffective for this purpose but effective to generate an increased quantity of novel ideas. These results demonstrate that both DbA methods provide de-fixation capabilities and enhance designers’ creativity during idea generation.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Reprint requests to: Diana P. Moreno, Research Unit in Engineering Science, Faculty of Science, Technology and Communication, University of Luxembourg, 6 Rue Richard Coudenhouve Kalergi, Luxembourg. E-mail: diana.moreno@uni.lu
References
Hide All
Agogué M., Kazakçi A., Weil B., & Cassotti M. (2011). The impacts of examples on creative design: explaining fixation and stimulation effects. 18th Int. Conf. Engineering Design. Copenhagen: ICED.
Altshuller G. (1999). The Innovation Algorithm: TRIZ, Systematic Innovation, and Technical Creativity. Worchester, MA: Technical Innovation Center.
Andersson P. (1994). Early design phases and their role in designing for quality. Journal of Engeering Design 5(4), 283298.
Ball L., Ormerod T., & Morley N. (2004). Spontaneous analogizing in engineering design: a comparative analysis of experts and novices. Design Studies 25(5), 495508.
Björklund T. (2013). Initial mental representations of design problems: differences between experts and novices. Design Studies 34(2), 135160.
Blosiu J. (1999). Use of synectics as an idea seeding technique to enhance design creativity. Proc. IEEE SMC ‘99 Conf. 1999: IEEE Int. Conf. Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Vol. 3, pp. 1001–1006. Tokyo: IEEE.
Bonnardel N. (2000). Towards understanding and supporting creativity in design: analogies in a constrained cognitive environment. Knowledge-Based Systems 13(7), 505513.
Cagan J., & Vogel C. (2013). Creating Breakthrough Products, 2nd ed.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
Chakrabarti A. (2013). Understanding influences on engineering creativity and innovation: a biographical study of 12 outstanding engineering designers and innovators. International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation 1(1), 5668.
Chan J., Fu K., Schunn C., Cagan J., Wood K., & Kotovsky K. (2011 a). On the benefits and pitfalls of analogies for innovative design: ideation performance based on analogical distance, commonness, and modality of examples. ASME Journal of Mechanical Design 133(8). doi:10.1115/1.4004396
Chan J., Fu K., Schunn C., Cagan J., Wood K., & Kotovsky K. (2011 b). On the effective use of design-by-analogy: influences of analogical distance and commonness of analogous design on ideation performance. 18th Int. Conf. Engineering Design. Copenhagen: ICED.
Choo P., Lou Z., Camburn B.K., Wood K., & Grey F. (2014). Ideation methods: a first study on measured outcomes with personality type. ASME 2014 Int. Design Engineering Conf./ Computers and Information in Engineering Conf., IDETC/CIE 2014, Paper No. DETC2014-34953. Buffalo, NY: ASME.
Christensen B., & Schunn C. (2005). Spontaneous access and analogical incubation effects. Creativity Research Journal 17(1–2), 207220.
Christensen B., & Schunn C. (2007). The relationship of analogical distance to analogical function and pre-inventive structures: the case of engineering design. Memory and Cognition 35(1), 2938.
Christiaans H., & Van Andel J. (1993). The effects of examples on the use of knowledge in a student design activity: the case of the “flying Dutchman.” Design Studies 14(1), 5874.
Chrysikou E., & Weisberg R. (2005). Following the wrong footsteps: fixation effects of pictorial examples in a design problem-solving task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 31(5), 11341148.
Cross N. (2004). Expertise in design: an overview. Design Studies 25(5), 427441.
Dong A., & Sarkar S. (2011). Unfixing design fixation: from cause to computer simulation. Journal of Creative Behavior 45(2), 147159.
Dugosh K., & Paulus P. (2005). Cognitive and social comparison processes in brainstorming. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 41(3), 313320.
Dugosh K., Paulus P., Roland E., & Yang H. (2000). Cognitive stimulation in brainstorming. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 79(5), 722735.
Eberle B. (1996). Scamper: Games for Imagination Development. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
Fu K., Moreno D., Yang M., & Wood K. (2014). Bio-inspired design: an overview investigating open questions from the broader field of design-by-analogy. ASME Journal of Mechanical Design 136(11), 111102. doi:10.1115/1.4028289
Genco N., Hölttä-Otto K., & Seepersad C. (2012). An experimental investigation of the innovation capabilities of undergraduate engineering students. Journal of Engineering Education 101(1), 6081.
Gentner D., & Markman A. (1997). Structure mapping in analogy and similarity. American Psychologist 52(1), 4556.
German T., & Barrett H. (2005). Functional fixedness in a technologically sparse culture. Psychological Science 16(1), 15.
Girotra K., Terwiesch C., & Ulrich K. (2010). Idea generation and the quality of the best idea. Management Science 56(4), 591605.
Goel V. (1995). Sketches of Thought. Cambridge, MA: Bradford–MIT Press.
Grantham K., Okudan G., Simpson T. W., & Ashour O. (2010). A study on situated cognition: product dissection's effect on redesign activities. Proc. Int. Design Engineering. Montreal: ASME.
Harris B. (1973). Heuristics and design. Papers in Regional Science 31(1), 314.
Hernández-Luna A., & Cárdenas-Franco L. (1988). Optimal design of glass molds using CAD/CAE and response surface methodology techniques. Computers & Graphics 12(3), 391399.
Hey J., Linsey J., Agogino A., & Wood K. (2007). Analogies and metaphors in creative design. Proc. Mudd Design Workshop VI, Claremont, CA, May 23–25.
Heylighen A., & Neuckermans H. (2003). Learning from experience? Promises, problems and side-effects of case-based reasoning in architectural design. International Journal of Architectural Computing 1(1), 6070.
Jansson D., & Smith S. (1991). Design fixation. Design Studies 12(1), 311.
Jensen D. (2010). Effects of an early prototyping experience: can design fixation be avoided? Proc. Annual Conf. Exposition. Louisville, KY: American Society for Engineering Education.
Kan J., & Gero J. (2008). Acquiring information from linkography in protocol studies of designing. Design Studies 29(4), 315337.
Keller R., Eckert C., & Clarkson P. (2009). Using an engineering change methodology to support conceptual design. Journal of Engineering Design 20(6), 571587.
Kershaw T., Hölttä-Otto K., & Lee Y. (2011). The effect of prototyping and critical feedback on fixation in engineering design. Proc. 33rd Annual Conf. Cognitive Science Society, CogSci'11. Boston, July 20–23.
Kohn N., & Smith S. (2009). Partly vs. completely out of your mind: effects of incubation and distraction on resolving fixation. Journal of Creative Behavior 43(2), 102118.
Kolodner J. (1997). Educational implications of analogy: a view from case-based reasoning. American Psychology 52(1), 5766.
Leynes P., Rass O., & Landau J. (2008). Eliminating the memory blocking effect. Memory 16(8), 852872.
Linsey J., Clauss E., Kortoglu T., Murphy J., Wood K., & Markman A. (2011). An experimental study of group idea generation techniques: understanding the roles of idea representation and viewing methods. ASME Journal of Mechanical Design 133(3), 031008031015. doi:10.1115/1.4003498
Linsey J., Clauss E., Wood K., Laux J., & Markman A. (2007). Increasing innovation: a trilogy of experiments towards a design-by analogy method. Proc. ASME 2007 Int. Design Engineering Technical Conf./Computers and Information in Engineering Conf., IDETC/CIE 2007. Las Vegas, NV: ASME.
Linsey J., Markman A., & Wood K. (2008). WordTrees: a method for design-by-analogy. Proc. ASEE Annual Conf. Pittsburgh, PA: ASEE.
Linsey J., Markman A., & Wood K. (2012). Design by analogy: a study of the WordTree method for problem re-representation. ASME Journal of Mechanical Design 134(4), 041009.
Linsey J., Tseng I., Fu K., Cagan J., Wood K., & Schunn C. (2010). A study of design fixation, its mitigation and perception in engineering design faculty. ASME Journal of Mechanical Design 132(4), 041003.
Linsey J., Wood K., & Markman A. (2008). Increasing innovation: presentation and evaluation of the WordTree design-by-analogy method. Proc. ASME Design Theory and Methodology Conf., DETC2008. New York: ASME.
Little A., Wood K., & McAdams D. (1997). Functional analysis: a fundamental empirical study for reverse engineering, benchmarking and redesign. Proc. Design Engineering Technical Conf. ’97. Sacramento, CA: ASME.
Luchins A., & Luchins E. (1959). Rigidity of Behaviour: A Variational Approach to the Effect of Einstellung. Eugene, OR: University of Oregon Books.
Luchins A., & Luchins E. (1970). Wertheimer's Seminars Revisited: Problem Solving and Thinking, Vol. 1. Albany, NY: State University of New York at Albany Press.
MacCrimmon K., & Wagner C. (1994). Stimulating ideas through creativity software. Management Science 40(11), 15141532.
Markman A., & Wood K. (2009). Tools for Innovation, Vol. 5. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Markman A., Wood K., Linsey J., Murphy J., & Laux J. (2009). Supporting innovation by promoting analogical reasoning. In Tools for Innovation (Markman A.B., & Wood K.L., Eds.), pp. 85103. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
McAdams D., & Wood K. (2002). A quantitative similarity metric for design by analogy. ASME Journal of Mechanical Design 24(2), 173182.
McKerlie D., & MacLean A. (1994). Reasoning with design rationale: practical experience with design space analysis. Design Studies 15(2), 214226.
Moreno D., Blessing L., Wood K., Vögele C., & Hernandez A. (2015). Creativity predictors: findings from design-by-analogy ideation methods’ learning and performance. Proc. Int. Design Engineering Technical Conf. Computers and Information in Engineering Conf., IDETC/DTM 2015. Boston: ASME.
Moreno D., Yang M., Blessing L., & Wood K. (2014). Analogies to succeed: application to a service design problem. Proc. NordDesign 2014. Espoo, Finland: Design Society.
Moreno D., Yang M., Hernandez A., Linsey J., & Wood K. (2014). A step beyond to overcome design fixation: a design-by-analogy approach. Proc. Design Computing and Cognition DCC, ‘14, pp. 661–680. London: Springer.
Moreno D.P., Hernandez A.A., Yang M.C., Otto K.N., Hölttä-Otto K., Linsey J.S., & Linden A. (2014). Fundamental studies in design-by-analogy: a focus on domain-knowledge experts and applications to transactional design problems. Design Studies 35(3), 232272.
Moss J., Cagan J., & Kotovsky K. (2007). Design ideas and impasses: the role of open goals. 16th Int. Conf. Engineering Design (ICED07). Paris: ICED.
Moss J., Kotovsky K., & Cagan J. (2007). The influence of open goals on the acquisition of problem relevant information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 33(5), 876891.
Oman S., Tumer I., Wood K., & Seepersad C. (2013). A comparison of creativity and innovation metrics and sample validation through in-class design projects. Journal of Research in Engineering Design 24(1), 6592.
Otto K., & Wood K. (1998). Product evolution: a reverse engineering and redesign methodology. Research in Engineering Design 10(4), 226243.
Perttula M., & Sipilä P. (2007). The idea exposure paradigm in design idea generation. Journal of Engineering Design 18(1), 93102.
Purcell A., & Gero J. (1996). Design and other types of fixation. Design Studies 17(4), 363383.
Robson C. (2002). Real World Research: A Resource for Social Scientists and Practitioner-Researchers, 2nd ed.Oxford: Blackwell.
Rodgers P., Green G., & McGown A. (2000). Using concept sketches to track design progress. Design Studies 21(5), 451464.
Sarkar P., & Chakrabarti A. (2007). Development of a method for assessing design creativity. Proc. Int. Conf. Engineering Design (ICED07). Paris, August 28–31.
Segers N., & De Vries B. (2003). The idea space system: words as handles to a comprehensive data structure. Proc. 10th Int. Conf. Computer Aided Architectural Design Futures, pp. 31–40. Dordrecht: Digital Design Research and Practice.
Segers N., De Vries B., & Achten H. (2005). Do word graphs stimulate design? Design Studies 26(6), 625647.
Shah J., Kulkarni S., & Vargas-Hernandez N. (2000). Evaluation of idea generation methods for conceptual design: effectiveness metrics and design of experiments. Journal of Mechanical Design 122(4), 377384.
Shah J., Smith S., & Vargas-Hernandez N. (2003). Metrics for measuring ideation effectiveness. Design Studies 24, 111134.
Shostack G. (1982). How to design a service. European Journal of Marketing 16(1), 4961.
Smith S. (1995 a). Creative cognition: demystifying creativity. In The Mind at Work in the Classroom: Literacy & Thinking (Hedley C., Antonacci P., & Rabinowitz M., Eds.), pp. 3146. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Smith S. (1995 b). Getting into and out of mental ruts: a theory of fixation, incubation, and insight. In The Nature of Insight (Sternberg R., & Davidson J.E., Eds.), pp. 229250. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Smith S., & Blankenship S. (1989). Incubation effects. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 27(4), 311314.
Smith S., & Blankenship S. (1991). Incubation and the persistence of fixation in problem solving. American Journal of Psychology 104(1), 6187.
Smith S., & Linsey J. (2011). A three-pronged approach for overcoming design fixation. Journal of Creative Behavior 45(2), 8391.
Srivathsavai R., Genco N., Hölttä-Otto K., & Seepersad C. (2010). Study of existing metrics used in measurement of ideation effectiveness. Proc. ASME IDETC Design Theory and Methodology Conf. Montreal: ASME.
Sternberg R., & Lubart T. (1999). The concept of creativity: prospects and paradigms. In Handbook of Creativity (Sternberg R., Ed.), pp. 315. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Toh C., Miller S., & Kremer G. (2012). Increasing novelty through product dissection activities in engineering design. Proc. Int. Design Engineering Technical Conf. (IDETC). Chicago: ASME.
Tseng I., Moss J., Cagan J., & Kotovsky K. (2008). Overcoming blocks in conceptual design: the effects of open goals and analogical similarity on idea generation. Proc. Int. Design Engineering Technical Conf./Computers and Information in Engineering. Brooklyn, NY: ASME.
Vargas-Hernandez N., Shah J., & Smith S. (2010). Understanding design ideation mechanisms through multilevel aligned empirical studies. Design Studies 31(4), 382410.
Vermeulen P. (2001). Organizing Product Innovation in Financial Services. Nijmegen: Nijmegen University Press.
Verhaegen P., D'hondt J., Vandevenne D., Dewulf S., & Duflou J. (2011). Identifying candidates for design-by-analogy. Computers in Industry 62(4), 446459.
Viswanathan V., & Linsey J. (2011). Design fixation in physical modeling: an investigation on the role of sunk cost. Proc. Int. Conf. Design Theory and Methodology. Washington, DC, August 28–31.
Viswanathan V., & Linsey J. (2012). A study on the role of expertise in design fixation and its mitigation. Proc. ASME Int. Design Engineering Technical Conf./Computers and Information in Engineering Conf., IDETC/CIE. Chicago: ASME.
Von Eye A., & Mun E. (2005). Analyzing Rater Agreement: Manifest Variable Methods. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Weaver J., Kuhr R., Wang D., Crawford R., Wood K., & Jensen D. (2009). Increasing innovation in multi-function systems: evaluation and experimentation of two ideation methods for design. Int. Design Engineering Conf./Computers and Information in Engineering, IDETC/CIE. San Diego, CA: ASME.
Yan W., Zanni-Merk C., Rousselot F., & Cavallucci D. (2013). Ontology matching for facilitating inventive de-sign based on semantic similarity and case-based reasoning. International Journal of Knowledge-Based and Intelligent Engineering Systems 17(3), 243256.
Yang M. (2004). An examination of prototyping and design outcome. Proc. Design Engineering Technical Conf. (DETC), pp. 1–6. New York: ASME.
Yang M. (2009). Observations on concept generation and sketching in engineering design. Research in Engineering Design 20(1), 111.
Yilmaz S., Seifert C., & Gonzalez R. (2010). Cognitive heuristics in design: instructional strategies to increase creativity in idea generation. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 24(3), 335355.
Youmans R. (2007). Reducing the Effects of Fixation in Creative Design. Ann Arbor, MI: ProQuest.
Youmans R. (2010). The effects of physical prototyping and groupwork on the reduction of design fixation. Design Studies 32(2), 115138.
Youmans R., & Arciszewski T. (2012). Design fixation: a cloak of many colors. Proc. Design Computing and Cognition, DCC'12, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX, June 6–12.
Zahner D., Nickerson J., Tversky B., Corter J., & Ma J. (2010). A fix for fixation? Rerepresenting and abstracting as creative processes in the design of information systems. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 24(2), 231244.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

AI EDAM
  • ISSN: 0890-0604
  • EISSN: 1469-1760
  • URL: /core/journals/ai-edam
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 12
Total number of PDF views: 118 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 466 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 17th January 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.