Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Quantifying diversity in parametric design: a comparison of possible metrics

  • Nathan C. Brown (a1) and Caitlin T. Mueller (a1)
Abstract

To be useful for architects and related designers searching for creative, expressive forms, performance-based digital tools must generate a diverse range of design solutions. This gives the designer flexibility to choose from a number of high-performing designs based on aesthetic preferences or other priorities. However, there is no single established method for measuring diversity in the context of computational design, especially in the field of architecture. This paper explores different metrics for quantifying diversity in parametric design, which is an increasingly common digital approach to early-stage exploration, and tests how human users perceive these diversity measurements. It first provides a review of existing methodologies for measuring diversity and describes how they can be adapted for parametrically formulated design spaces. This paper then tests how these different metrics align with human perception of design diversity through an online visual survey. Finally, it offers a quantitative comparison between the different methods and a discussion of their attributes and potential applications. In general, the comparison indicates that at the level of diversity difference that becomes visually meaningful to humans, the measurable difference between metrics is small. This paper informs future researchers, developers, and designers about the measurement of diversity in parametric design, and can stimulate further studies into the perception of diversity within sets of design options, as well as new design methodologies that combine architectural novelty and performance.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Author for correspondence: Nathan C. Brown, E-mail: ncbrown@mit.edu
References
Hide All
Aggarwal, CC, Hinneburg, A and Keim, DA (2001) On the surprising behavior of distance metrics in high dimensional space. ICDT 1, 420434.
Agresti, A and Agresti, BF (1978) Statistical analysis of qualitative variation. Sociological Methodology 9, 204237.
Amabile, TM (1982) Social psychology of creativity: a consensual assessment technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 43(5), 9971013.
Autodesk (2013) Dynamo. San Rafael, CA: Autodesk, Inc.
Balling, R (1999) Design by Shopping: A New Paradigm? In Proceedings of the Third World Congress of structural and multidisciplinary optimization (WCSMO-3).
Berkhin, P (2006) Survey of clustering data mining techniques. In Kogan, J, Nicholas, C and Teboulle, M (eds). Grouping Multidimensional Data. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 2571.
Brown, N and Mueller, C (2016) Design for structural and energy performance of long span buildings using geometric multi-objective optimization. Energy and Buildings 127, 748761.
Brown, N, Tseranidis, S and Mueller, C (2015) Multi-objective Optimization for Diversity and Performance in Conceptual Structural Design. In Proceedings of the International Association for Shell and Spatial Structures Symposium 2015: Future Visions. Amsterdam: IASS.
Buhrmester, M, Kwang, T and Gosling, SD (2011) Amazon's Mechanical Turk: a new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science 6(1), 35.
Burry, M (1996) Parametric design and the Sagrada Familia. Architectural Research Quarterly 1(4), 7081.
Caldas, LG and Norford, LK (2003) Genetic algorithms for optimization of building envelopes and the design and control of HVAC systems. Journal of Solar Energy Engineering 125(3), 343351.
Coley, DA and Schukat, S (2002) Low-energy design: combining computer-based optimisation and human judgement. Building and Environment 37(12), 12411247.
Colley, WN (2002) Colley's Bias Free College Football Ranking Method: The Colley Matrix Explained. Princeton, NJ: Elsevier.
Cornwell, WK, Schwilk, DW and Ackerly, DD (2006) A trait-based test for habitat filtering: convex hull volume. Ecology 87(6), 14651471.
Cvetkovic, D and Parmee, IC (2002) Preferences and their application in evolutionary multiobjective optimization. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 6(1), 4257.
Dean, DL, Hender, JM, Rodgers, TL and Santanen, E (2006) Identifying good ideas: constructs and scales for idea evaluation. Journal of Association for Information Systems 7(10), 646699.
Deb, K, Pratap, A, Agarwal, S and Meyarivan, T (2002) A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 6(2), 182197.
Design (2017) In Cambridge Dictionary of American English. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Erhan, H, Wang, IY and Shireen, N (2015) Harnessing design space: a similarity-based exploration method for generative design. International Journal of Architectural Computing 13(2), 217236.
Gane, V (2004) Parametric Design – A Paradigm Shift? Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Goldschmidt, G (1994) On visual design thinking: the vis kids of architecture. Design Studies 15(2), 158174.
Google Maps (2017) www.google.com/maps.
Häggman, A, Tsai, G, Elsen, C, Honda, T and Yang, M (2015) Connections between the design tool, design attributes, and user preferences in early stage design. Journal of Mechanical Design 137(7), 071408-1071408-13.
Hill, MO (1973) Diversity and evenness: a unifying notation and its consequences. Ecology 54(2), 427432.
Holzer, D, Hough, R and Burry, M (2008) Parametric design and structural optimisation for early design exploration. International Journal of Architectural Computing 5(4), 625644.
Horn, D and Salvendy, G (2009) Measuring consumer perception of product creativity: impact on satisfaction and purchasability. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing 19(3), 223240.
Jain, AK (2010) Data clustering: 50 years beyond K-means. Pattern Recognition Letters 31(8), 651666.
Jost, L (2006) Entropy and diversity. Oikos 113(2), 363375.
Kan, JWT and Gero, JS (2018) Characterizing innovative processes in design spaces through measuring the information entropy of empirical data from protocol studies. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 32(1), 3243.
Kokare, M, Chatterji, BN and Biswas, PK (2003) Comparison of Similarity Metrics for Texture Image Retrieval. In TENCON 2003: Conference on Convergent Technologies for the Asia-Pacific Region. Bangalore, India.
Kolarevic, B (ed.) (2003) Architecture in the Digital age: Design and Manufacturing. Spon Press, an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, New York and London.
Kudrowitz, BM and Wallace, D (2017) Assessing the quality of ideas from prolific, early-stage product ideation. Journal of Engineering Design 24(2), 120139.
Layman, CA, Arrington, DA, Montana, CG and Post, DM (2007) Can stable isotope ratios provide for community-wide measures of trophic structure. Ecology 88(1), 4248.
Lehman, J and Stanley, KO (2011) Abandoning objectives: evolution through the search for novelty alone. Evolutionary Computation 19(2), 189223.
Macomber, B and Yang, M (2011) The Role of Sketch Finish and Style in User Responses to Early Stage Design Concepts. In Proceedings of the ASME 2011 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. Washington, DC.
Marks, W (1997) Multicriteria optimisation energy-saving buildings. Building and Environment 32(4), 331339.
McCaffrey, T and Spector, L (2018) An approach to human–machine collaboration in innovation. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 32(1), 115.
McCune, B and Grace, JB (2002) Analysis of Ecological Communities. Oregon, USA, Gleneden Beach: MjM Software.
Monedero, J (2000) Parametric design: a review and some experiences. Automation in Construction 9, 369377.
Mueller, CT and Ochsendorf, JA (2015) Combining structural performance and designer preferences in evolutionary design space exploration. Automation in Construction 52, 7082.
Oxman, R (2008) Design: current practices and research issues. International Journal of Architectural Computing 6(1), 117.
Paolacci, G, Chandler, J and Ipeirotis, P (2010) Running experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Judgment and Decision Making 5(5), 411419.
Patil, AGP and Taillie, C (1982) Diversity as a concept and its measurement. Journal of the American Statistical Association 77(379), 548561.
Pavoine, S, Ollier, S and Pontier, D (2005) Measuring diversity from dissimilarities with Rao's quadratic entropy: Are any dissimilarities suitable? Theoretical Population Biology 67, 231239.
Perlibakas, V (2004) Distance measures for PCA-based face recognition. Pattern Recognition Letters 25, 711724.
Podani, J (2009) Convex hulls, habitat filtering, and functional diversity: mathematical elegance versus ecological interpretability. Community Ecology 10(2), 244250.
Rao, CR (1981) Gini-Simpson Index of Diversity: A Characterization, Generalization and Applications. Technical Report No. 81–22, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Rényi, A (1961) On Measures of Entropy and Information. In Proceedings of the Fourth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability 1, 547561.
Risi, S, Vanderbleek, SD, Hughes, CE and Stanley, KO (2009) How Novelty Search Escapes the Deceptive Trap of Learning to Learn. In Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO-2009). New York: ACM.
Ritter, J (1990) An efficient bounding sphere. In Glassner, AS (ed.). Graphics Gems 1. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, pp. 301303.
Robert McNeel & Associates (2014) Grasshopper. Seattle, WA: Robert McNeel & Associates. www.grasshopper3d.com.
Runco, MA and Charles, RE (1993) Judgments of originality and appropriateness as predictors of creativity. Personality and Individual Differences 15(5), 537546.
Rusch, C (1966) The Psychological Basis for an Incremental Approach to Architecture. Berkeley, CA: University of California at Berkeley.
Scheibehenne, B, Greifeneder, R and Todd, PM (2010) Can there ever be too many options? A meta-analytic review of choice overload. Journal of Consumer Research 37, 409425.
Shah, J, Kulkarni, S and Vargas-Hernandez, N (2000) Guidelines for experimental evaluation of idea generation methods in conceptual design. Journal of Mechanical Design 122(4), 337384.
Shah, JJ, Smith, SM and Vargas-Hernandez, N (2003) Metrics for measuring ideation effectiveness. Design Studies 24(2), 111134.
Shannon, CE and Weaver, W (1949) The Mathematical Theory of Information. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Smaling, R (2005) System Architecture Analysis and Selection under Uncertainty. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Srinivas, M and Patnaik, LM (1994) Adaptive probabilities of crossover and mutation in genetic algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 24(4), 656667.
Stump, G, Yukish, M, Simpson, T and Harris, E (2003) Design Space Visualization and Its Application to a Design by Shopping Paradigm. Proceedings of DETC’03 ASME 2003 Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference.
Tsigkari, M, Chronis, A, Joyce, S, Davis, A, Feng, S and Aish, F (2013) Integrated Design in the Simulation Process. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Simulation for Architecture & Urban Design.
Villéger, S, Mason, NWH and Mouillot, D (2008) New multidimensional functional diversity indices for a multifaceted framework in functional ecology. Ecology 89(8), 22902301.
Wang, J, Neskovic, P and Cooper, LN (2007) Improving nearest neighbor rule with a simple adaptive distance measure. In Pattern Recognition Letters 28, 207213.
Welzl, E (1991) New results and new trends in computer science: smallest enclosing disks (balls and ellipsoids). Lecture Notes in Computer Science 555, 359370.
Yousif, S, Yan, W and Culp, C (2017) Incorporating form diversity into architectural design optimization. In Proceedings of ACADIA 2017: Disciplines and Disruption. Cambridge, MA.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

AI EDAM
  • ISSN: 0890-0604
  • EISSN: 1469-1760
  • URL: /core/journals/ai-edam
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed