Skip to main content Accesibility Help
×
×
Home

A study on the effects of example familiarity and modality on design fixation

  • Vimal Viswanathan (a1), Megan Tomko (a2) and Julie Linsey (a2)
Abstract

Design fixation is a factor that negatively influences the generation of novel design concepts (Jansson & Smith, 1991). When designers fixate, they tend to reproduce example features or features from their initial ideas. In order to mitigate design fixation, it is crucial to identify the factors that influence the extent of design fixation. This paper investigates two such factors: the modality of examples and the familiarity of designers with the example features. To investigate this, an experiment is conducted with mechanical engineering students who were asked to generate ideas to solve a peanut sheller design problem. The students generated ideas in five different experimental conditions: control, where no example was given; the first example given in a sketch form; the first example given as a nonfunctional prototype; a second example in sketch form; and the second example in a working prototype form. The first example was a nonfeasible solution, but it contained several features familiar to the participants. The second example was a feasible solution, but it contained less familiar features. In order to understand the extent of fixation triggered by the examples, three metrics were utilized to compare across the experimental conditions: the quantity of nonredundant ideas generated by the participants, the presence of example features in their solutions, and their fixation to the example's energy source. The results showed that in the case of the familiar example, the example modality did play an important role in the extent of design fixation. Across the examples, it was found that the first example containing several familiar features caused more fixation than the second one. Overall, this paper shows that the modality in which the example was communicated and the presence of familiar features in an example influenced the fixation caused by those examples.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Reprint requests to: Vimal Viswanathan, Mechanical Engineering Department, Tuskegee University, 1200 West Montgomery Street, Tuskegee, AL 36088, USA. E-mail: vviswanathan@mytu.tuskegee.edu
References
Hide All
Anderson, J.R. (1983). A spreading activation theory of memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 22(3), 261295.
Anderson, M.J. (2001). Permutation tests for univariate or multivariate analysis of variance and regression. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 58(3), 626639.
Arnon, R., & Kreitler, S. (1984). Effects of meaning training on overcoming functional fixedness. Current Psychology 3(4), 1124.
Brown, V., Tumeo, M., Larey, T.S., & Paulus, P.B. (1998). Modeling cognitive interactions during group brainstorming. Small Group Research 29(4), 495526.
Cardoso, C., & Badke-Schaub, P. (2011). The influence of different pictorial representations during idea generation. Journal of Creative Behavior 45(2), 130146.
Cardoso, C., Badke-Schaub, P., & Luz, A. (2009). Design fixation on non-verbal stimuli: the influence of simple vs. rich pictorial information on design problem-solving. Proc. ASME 2009 Int. Design Engineering Technical Conf. and Computers and Information in Engineering Conf., pp. 995–1002. San Diego, CA: ASME.
Christensen, B.T., & Schunn, C.D. (2005). The relationship of analogical distance to analogical function and pre-inventive structure: the case of engineering design. Creative Cognition: Analogy and Incubation 35(1), 2938.
Christensen, B.T., & Schunn, C.D. (2007). The relationship of analogical distance to analogical function and preinventive structure: the case of engineering design. Memory & Cognition 35(1), 2938.
Chrysikou, E.G., & Weisberg, R.W. (2005). Following the wrong footsteps: fixation effects of pictorial examples in a design problem-solving task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 31(5), 11341148.
Clark-Carter, D. (1997). Doing Quantitative Psychological Research: From Design to Report. East Sussex: Psychology Press/Erlbaum.
Collins, A.M., & Loftus, E.F. (1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review 82(6), 407428.
Coskun, H., Paulus, P.B., Brown, V., & Sherwood, J.J. (2000). Cognitive stimulation and problem presentation in idea-generating groups. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice 4(4), 307.
Dugosh, L.K., & Paulus, P.B. (2005). Cognitive and social comparison processes in brainstorming. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 41(3), 313320.
Fish, J., & Scrivener, S. (1990). Amplifying the mind's eye: sketching and visual cognition. Leonardo 23(1), 117126.
Full Belly Project. (2011). Accessed at http://www.thefullbellyproject.org/ on January 13, 2013.
Fu, K., Cagan, J., & Kotovsky, K. (2010). Design team convergence: the influence of example solution quality. Journal of Mechanical Design 132(11), 111005.
Goldschmidt, G. (1989). Problem representation versus domain of solution in architectural design teaching. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research 6(3), 204215.
Goldschmidt, G. (1991). The dialectics of sketching. Creativity Research Journal 4(2), 123143.
Goldschmidt, G. (2007). To see eye to eye: the role of visual representations in building shared mental models in design teams. CoDesign 3(1), 4350.
Goldschmidt, G., & Smolkov, M. (2006). Variances in the impact of visual stimuli on design problem solving performance. Design Studies 27(5), 549569.
Good, P.I. (2000). Permutation Tests. New York: Springer.
Hannah, R., Joshi, S., & Summers, J.D. (2012). A user study of interpretability of engineering design representations. Journal of Engineering Design 23(6), 443468.
Hirtz, J., Stone, R.B., & McAdams, D.A. (2002). A functional basis for engineering design: reconciling and evolving previous efforts. Research in Engineering Design 13(2), 6582.
Jansson, D., & Smith, S. (1991). Design fixation. Design Studies 12(1), 311.
Jonson, B. (2002). Sketching now. International Journal of Art & Design Education 21(3), 246253.
Kiriyama, T., & Yamamoto, T. (1998). Strategic knowledge acquisition: a case study of learning through prototyping. Knowledge-Based Systems 11(7–8), 399404.
Linsey, J., Clauss, E.F., Kurtoglu, T., Murphy, J.T., Wood, K.L., & Markman, A.B. (2011). An experimental study of group idea generation techniques: understanding the roles of idea representation and viewing methods. ASME Transactions: Journal of Mechanical Design 133(3), 031008.
Linsey, J., Green, M.G., Murphy, J., Wood, K.L., & Markman, A.B. (2005). Collaborating to success: an experimental study of group idea generation techniques. Proc. ASME IDETC—Design Theory and Methodology, pp. 24–28. Long Beach, CA: ASME.
Linsey, J.S., Tseng, I., Fu, K., Cagan, J., Wood, K.L., & Schunn, C. (2010). A study of design fixation, its mitigation and perception in engineering design faculty. Journal of Mechanical Design 132(4), 041003.
Maier, N.R.F. (1931). Reasoning in humans: II. The solution of a problem and its appearance in consciousness. Journal of Comparative Psychology 12(2), 181.
Matlin, M.W. (2005). Cognition. New York: Wiley.
McCaffrey, T. (2012). Innovation relies on the obscure a key to overcoming the classic problem of functional fixedness. Psychological Science 23(3), 215218.
Moreno, D.P., Yang, M.C., Hernández, A.A., Linsey, J.S., & Wood, K.L. (2015). A step beyond to overcome design fixation: a design-by-analogy approach. Proc. Design Computing and Cognition'14, pp. 607–624. London: Springer.
Pahl, G., & Beitz, W. (2003). Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach. London: Springer.
Perttula, M., & Sipilä, P. (2007). The idea exposure paradigm in design idea generation. Journal of Engineering Design 18(1), 93102.
Perttula, M.K., & Liikkanen, L.A. (2006). Structural tendencies and exposure effects in design idea generation. Proc. ASME Design Engineering Technical Conf. Philadelphia, PA: ASME.
Purcell, A., & Gero, J. (1992). Effects of examples on the results of a design activity. Knowledge-Based Systems 5(1), 8291.
Purcell, A.T., & Gero, J.S. (1996). Design and other types of fixation. Design Studies 17(4), 363383.
Shah, J.J., Kulkarni, S.V., & Vargas-Hernandez, N. (2000). Evaluation of idea generation methods for conceptual design: effectiveness metrics and design of experiments. Journal of Mechanical Design 122(4), 377384.
Smith, S.M., Ward, T.B., & Schumacher, J.S. (1993). Constraining effects of examples in a creative generation task. Memory & Cognition 21(6), 837845.
Tabachnick, B.G., & Fidell, L.S. (2007). Experimental Designs Using ANOVA. Belmont, CA: Thomson/Brooks/Cole.
Viswanathan, V., & Linsey, J. (2013 a). Design fixation and its mitigation: a study on the role of expertise. ASME Transactions: Journal of Mechanical Design 135(5), 051008.
Viswanathan, V., & Linsey, J. (2013 b). Examining design fixation in engineering idea generation: the role of example modality. International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation 1(2), 109129.
Viswanathan, V., & Linsey, J. (2013 c). Role of sunk cost in engineering idea generation: an experimental investigation. ASME Transactions: Journal of Mechanical Design 135(12), 121002.
Viswanathan, V.K., & Linsey, J. (2012). Physical models and design thinking: a study of functionality, novelty and variety of ideas. ASME Transactions: Journal of Mechanical Design 134(9), 091004.
Viswanathan, V.K., & Linsey, J.S. (2010). Physical models in idea generation: hindrance or help? Proc. ASME 2010 Int. Design Engineering Technical Conf. Computers and Information in Engineering Conf., pp. 329–339, Montreal, August 15–18.
Voss, J.F., Vesonder, G.T., & Spilich, G.J. (1980). Text generation and recall by high-knowledge and low-knowledge individuals. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 19(6), 651667.
Wiley, J. (1998). Expertise as mental set: the effects of domain knowledge in creative problem solving. Memory & Cognition 26(4), 716730.
Youmans, R.J. (2011). The effects of physical prototyping and group work on the reduction of design fixation. Design Studies 32(2), 115138.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

AI EDAM
  • ISSN: 0890-0604
  • EISSN: 1469-1760
  • URL: /core/journals/ai-edam
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed