Skip to main content

Tangible interactions in a digital age: Medium and graphic visualization in design journals

  • Lora Oehlberg (a1), Kimberly Lau (a1) and Alice Agogino (a1)

Designers are interacting with an increasing number of digital tools in their design process; however, these are usually in addition to the traditional and ubiquitous paper-based design journals. This paper explores the medium of informal design information and its relationships with sketching behavior over three stages of the design process: preliminary investigation and user needs analyses, concept generation and development, and prototyping and testing. Our test bed consists of tangible, digital, and hybrid design journals collected from four semesters of UC Berkeley's graduate level, multidisciplinary course titled “Managing the New Product Development Process: Design Theory and Methods.” We developed protocols for two categories of analysis: one that codes for the media type of each journal and its content, and another one that characterizes the content within the journal. We found a trend toward hybrid digital–tangible journals for the engineering students over the 4-year period. These hybrid journals exhibited a higher degree of detail over advancing design stages, which has been shown to correlate with improved project performance. We also present several case studies of unusual design journals that illustrate the range of designers' interpretations of design journals as a medium. Based on this descriptive research, features for interactive hybrid tangible–digital design journals are recommended.

Hide All
Bellotti, V., & Bly, S. (1996). Walking away from the desktop computer: distributed collaboration and mobility in a product design team. Proc. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 209218.
Bystrom, M., & Eisenstein, B. (2005). Practical Engineering Design. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis.
Chen, H.L., Cannon, D.M., Gabrio, J., & Leifer, L. (2005). Using wikis and weblogs to support reflective learning in an introductory engineering design course. Proc. 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conf. Exposition.
Ferguson, E. (1992). Engineering and the Mind's Eye. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Gross, M., & Do, E. (1996). Demonstrating the electronic cocktail napkin: a paper-like interface for early design. Proc. Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 56.
Gross, M., Do, E., McCall, R., Citrin, W., Hamill, P., Warmack, A., & Kuczun, K. (1998). Collaboration and coordination in architectural design: approaches to computer mediated work. Automation in Construction 7, 465473.
Henderson, K. (1999). On Line and On Paper. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hong, J., Toye, G., & Leifer, L. (1995). Personal electronic notebook with sharing. Proc. 4th Workshop on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises (WET-ICE ’95), p. 88, April 20–22, 1995.
Hyman, B. (2003). Fundamentals of Engineering Design. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice–Hall.
Kam, M., Wang, J., Iles, A.L., Tse, E., Chiu, J., Glaser, D., Tarshish, O., & Canny, J. (2005). Livenotes: a system for cooperative and augmented note-taking in lectures. Proc. ACM Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 531540.
Klemmer, S., Newman, M., Farrell, R., Bilezikjian, M., & Landay, J. (2001). The designers’ outpost: a tangible interface for collaborative web site. Proc. 14th Annual ACM Symp. User Interface Software and Technology, pp. 110.
Lakin, F., Wambaugh, J., Leifer, L., Cannon, D., & Sivard, C. (1989). The electronic design notebook: performing medium and processing medium. The Visual Computer 5 (4), 214226.
Lee, B. (2006). From cognitive artifacts to social artifacts: the iDeas Design ecology. Proc. ACM Symp. User Interface Software and Technology, Conf. Supplement to UIST 2006.
Lin, X., Hmelo, C., Kinzer, C., & Sewles, T. (1999). Designing technology that supports reflection. Educational Technology Research and Development 47 (3), 4362.
McAlpine, H., Hicks, B.J., Huet, G., & Culley, S.J. (2006). An investigation into the use and content of the engineer's logbook. Design Studies 27 (4), 481504.
McGown, A., Green, G., & Rodgers, P. (1998). Visible ideas: information patterns of conceptual sketch activity. Design Studies 19 (4), 431453.
Schön, D. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books.
Sellen, A., & Harper, R.J. (2002). The Myth of the Paperless Office. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Shah, J., Vargas-Hernandez, N., & Smith, S. (2003). Metrics for measuring ideation effectiveness. Design Studies 24 (2), 111134.
Song, S., & Agogino, A. (2004). Insights in designers' sketching activities in new product design teams. Proc. ASME Design Theory and Methods Conf., pp. 351360.
Stifelman, L., Arons, B., & Schmandt, C. (2001). The audio notebook: paper and pen interaction with structured speech. Proc. SIGCHI Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 182189.
Ullman, D.G. (1997). The Mechanical Design Process. New York: McGraw–Hill.
Ullman, D.G., Wood, S., & Craig, D. (1990). The importance of drawing in the mechanical design process. Computer Graphics 14 (2), 263274.
Wilcox, L., Schilit, B., & Sawhney, N. (1997). Dynomite: a dynamically organized ink and audio notebook. Proc. ACM Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 186193.
Yang, M.C., & Cham, J.G. (2007). An analysis of sketching skill and its role in early stage engineering design. ASME Journal of Mechanical Design 129 (5), 476482.
Yeh, R.B., Liao, C., Klemmer, S.R., Guimbretière, F., Lee, B., Kakaradov, B., Stamberger, J., & Paepcke, A. (2006). ButterflyNet: a mobile capture and access system for field biology research. Proc. Conf. Computer–Human Interactions, pp. 571580.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

  • ISSN: 0890-0604
  • EISSN: 1469-1760
  • URL: /core/journals/ai-edam
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 7
Total number of PDF views: 45 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 407 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 17th March 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.