Skip to main content Accessibility help

Teaching innovative design reasoning: How concept–knowledge theory can help overcome fixation effects

  • Armand Hatchuel (a1), Pascal Le Masson (a1) and Benoit Weil (a1)


How can we prepare engineering students to work collectively on innovative design issues, involving ill-defined, “wicked” problems? Recent works have emphasized the need for students to learn to combine divergent and convergent thinking in a collaborative, controlled manner. From this perspective, teaching must help them overcome four types of obstacles or “fixation effects” (FEs) that are found in the generation of alternatives, knowledge acquisition, collaborative creativity, and creativity processes. We begin by showing that teaching based on concept–knowledge (C-K) theory can help to manage FEs because it helps to clarify them and then to overcome them by providing means of action. We show that C-K theory can provide scaffolding to improve project-based learning (PBL), in what we call project-based critical learning (PBCL). PBCL helps students be critical and give due thought to the main issues in innovative design education: FEs. We illustrate the PBCL process with several cases and show precisely where the FEs appear and how students are able to overcome them. We conclude by discussing two main criteria of any teaching method, both of which are usually difficult to address in situations of innovative design teaching. First, can the method be evaluated? Second, is the chosen case “realistic” enough? We show that C-K-based PBCL can be rigorously evaluated by teachers, and we discuss the circumstances in which a C-K-based PBCL may or may not be realistic.



Hide All
Alexander, C. (1964). Notes on the Synthesis of Form. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Argyris, C., & Schön, D.A. (1996). Organizational Learning II. Reading, MA: Addison–Wesley.
Boden, M. (1990). The Creative Mind. London: George Weidenfeld and Nicolson Ltd.
Brereton, M. (1999). The role of hardware in learning engineering fundamentals: an empirical study of engineering design and product analysis activity. PhD Thesis. Stanford University.
Brown, V.R., Tumeo, M., Larey, T.S., & Paulus, P.B. (1998). Modelling cognitive interactions during group brainstorming. Small Group Research 29, 495526.
Camacho, L.M., & Paulus, P.B. (1995). The role of social anxiousness in group brainstorming. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 68, 10711080.
Collaros, P.A., & Anderson, L.R. (1969). Effect of perceived expertness upon creativity of members of brainstorming groups. Journal of Applied Psychology 53(2), 159163.
Cropley, A. (2006). In praise of convergent thinking. Creativity Research Journal 18(3), 391404.
Diehl, M., & Stroebe, W. (1987). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: towards the solution of a ridle. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 53, 497509.
Droste, M. (2002). Bauhaus 1919–1933. Köln, Germany: Taschen.
Dunne, D., & Martin, R. (2006). Design thinking and how it will change management education: an interview and discussion. Academy of Management Learning and Education 5(4), 512523.
Dym, C.L., Agogino, A.M., Eris, O., Frey, D.D., & Leifer, L.J. (2005). Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning. Journal of Engineering Education 94, 103120.
Edelman, J., Karanian, B., Skogstad, P., Heikkinen, M., & Repokari, L. (2008). Fuzzy versus technical prototypes in design decision making process. Center for Design Research Informatics Laboratory Working Papers, Stanford University.
Engelmeyer, P.K.v. (1895). Was ist eine Erfindung? Civilingenieur 41, 282300.
Eris, O. (2003). Asking generative questions: a fundamental cognitive mechanism in design thinking. Proc. Int. Conf. Engineering Design, ICED'03, Stockholm.
Eris, O. (2004). Effective Inquiry for Innovative Engineering Design. Boston: Kluwer Academic.
Erkens, A. (1928). Beiträge zur Konstrukteurerziehung. Zeitschrift des Vereines deutscher Ingenieure 72(1), 1721.
Finke, R.A. (1990). Creative Imagery: Discoveries and Inventions in Visualization. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Gigone, D., & Hastie, R. (1997). Proper analysis of the accuracy of group judgements. Psychological Bulletin 121, 149167.
Guilford, J.P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist 3, 444454.
Guilford, J.P. (1985). A sixty-year perspective on psychological I measurement. Applied Psychological Measurement 9, 341351.
Hatchuel, A., Le Masson, P., & Weil, B. (2008). Studying creative design: the contribution of C-K theory. Proc. Conf. Studying Design Creativity: Design Science, Computer Science, Cognitive Science and Neuroscience Approaches, Aix-en-Provence, France, March 10–11.
Hatchuel, A., & Weil, B. (2003). A new approach of innovative design: an introduction to C-K theory. Proc. Int. Conf. Engineering Design, ICED'03, p. 14, Stockholm.
Hatchuel, A., & Weil, B. (2007). Design as Forcing: deepening the foundations of C-K theory. Proc. Int. Conf. Engineering Design, ICED'07, p. 12, Paris.
Heymann, M. (2005). “Kunst” und Wissenchsaft in der Technik des 20. Jahrhunderts. Zur Geschichte der Konstruktionswissenschaft. Zürich: Chronos Verlag.
Hmelo-Silver, C.E., Duncan, R.G., & Chinn, C.A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: a response to Kirschner, Sweller and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist 42(2), 99107.
Itten, J. (1975). Design and Form, the Basic Course at the Bauhaus and Later. London: Wiley.
Jansson, D.G., & Smith, S.M. (1991). Design fixation. Design Studies 12(1), 311.
Kirschner, P.A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R.E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instructon does not work: an analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist 41(2), 7586.
König, W. (1998). Zwischen Verwaltungsstaat und Industriegesellschaft: Die Gründung höherer technischen Bildungsstätten in Deutschland in der ersten Jahrzehnten des 19. Jahrhunderts. Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte 21, 115122.
König, W. (1999). Künstler und Strichezieher. Konstruktions- und Technikkulturen im deutschen, britischen, amerikanischen und französischen Maschinenbau zwischen 1850 und 1930. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Verlag.
Le Masson, P., Hatchuel, A., & Weil, B. (2007). Creativity and design reasoning: how C-K theory can enhance creative design. Proc. Int. Conf. Engineering Design, ICED'07, p. 12, Paris.
Linder, B.M. (1999). Understanding estimation and its relation to engineering education. PhD Thesis. Massachussetts Institute of Technology.
Loch, C.L., De Meyer, A., & Pich, M.T. (2006). Managing the Unknown. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Mabogunje, A., & Leifer, L.J. (1997). Noun phrases as surrogates for measuring early phases of the mechanical design process. Proc. 9th ASME Int. Conf. Design Theory and Methodology, p. 6, Sacramento, CA, September 14–17.
Magnusson, P. (2003). Managing user involvement for service innovation, findings from end-user telecom services innovation. Journal of Service Research 6(2), 111124.
McMahon, C.A., Ion, B., & Hamilton, P. (2003). Sharing experience in engineering design education: historical background and future plans. Proc. Int. Conf. Engineering Design, ICED'03, p. 10, Stockholm.
Mullen, B., Johnson, C., & Salas, E. (1991). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: a meta-analytic integration. Basic and Applied Social Psychology 12, 323.
Mulligan, N., & Hartman, M. (1996). Divided attention and indirect memory tests. Memory & Cognition 24, 453465.
Osborn, A.F. (1957). Applied Imagination. New York: Charles Scribner.
Pahl, G., & Beitz, W. (1977). Konstruktionslehre (Engineering Design). Berlin: Springer–Verlag.
Pahl, G., & Beitz, W. (2006). Engineering Design, a Systematic Approach. Berlin: Springer.
Paulus, P.B. (2000). Groups, teams, and creativity: the creative potential of idea-generating groups. Applied Psychology: An International Review 49(2), 237262.
Paulus, P.B., Brown, V.R., & Ortega, A.H. (1999). Group creativity. In Social Creativity in Organization (Purser, R.E., & Montuori, A., Eds.). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
Paulus, P.B., & Dzindolet, M.T. (1993). Social influence processes in group brainstorming. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 64, 575586.
Paulus, P.B., Larey, T.S., & Dzindolet, M.T. (2000). Creativity in groups and teams. In Groups at Work: Advances in Theory and Research (Turner, M., Ed.), pp. 319338. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Paulus, P.B., & Yang, H.-C. (2000). Idea generation in groups: a basis for creativity in organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 82(1), 7687.
Plety, R., & Cremet, C. (2007). Pédagogie de l'innovation. Unpublished manuscript.
Raïffa, H. (1968). Decision Analysis. Reading, MA: Addison–Wesley.
Redtenbacher, F. (1852). Prinzipien der Mechanik und des Maschinenbaus. Mannheim, Germany: Bassermann.
Reilly, R.R., Lynn, G.S., & Aronson, Z.L. (2002). The role of personality in new product development team performance. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 19(1), 3958.
Rice, P. (1994). An Engineer Imagines. New York: Artemis.
Rittel, H.W.J., & Webber, M.M. (1972). Dilemnas in a General Theory of Planning, p. 22. Berkeley, CA: University of California at Berkeley.
Rodenacker, W.G. (1970). Methodisches Konstruieren. Berlin: Springer–Verlag.
Savage, L.J. (1972). The Foundations of Statistics. New York: Dover.
Savanovic, P., & Zeiler, W. (2007). “Integral design” workshops: improving building practice and education through methodological approach for multidisciplinary design teams. Proc. Int. Conf. Engineering Design, ICED'07, p. 12, Paris, August 28–31.
Schön, D.A. (1990). The design process. In Varieties of Thinking. Essays from Harvard's Philosophy of Education Research Center (Howard, V.A., Ed.), pp. 110141. New York: Routledge.
Schön, D.A. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner, How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books.
Shah, J.J., Vargas-Hernandez, N., & Smith, S.M. (2003). Metrics for measuring ideation effectiveness. Design Studies 24, 111134.
Simon, H.A. (1969). The Sciences of the Artificial. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Smith, S.M., Ward, T.B., & Schumacher, J.S. (1993). Constraining effects of examples in a creative generation task. Memory & Cognition 21, 837845.
Song, S., Dong, S., & Agogino, A.M. (2003). Time variance of design “story telling” in engineering design teams. Proc. Int. Conf. Engineering Design, Stockholm.
Stasser, G., & Birchmeier, Z. (2003). Group creativity and collective choice. In Group Creativity: Innovation Through Collaboration (Paulus, P.B., & Nijstad, B.A., Eds.), pp. 85109. New York: Oxford University Press.
Stewart, D.D., & Stasser, G. (1995). Expert role assignment and information sampling during collective recall and and decision-making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 69, 619628.
Sutton, R.I., & Hargadon, A. (1996). Brainstorming groups in context: effectiveness in a product design firm. Administrative Science Quarterly 41(4), 685718.
Torrance, E.P. (1988). The nature of creativity as manifest in its testing. In The Nature of Creativity (Sternberg, R.J., Ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
von Hippel, E. (2001). Perspective: user toolkits for innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management 18, 247257.
Ward, T.B. (1994). Structured imagination: the role of category structure in exemplar generation. Cognitive Psychology 27, 140.
Ward, T.B., Smith, S.M., & Finke, R.A. (1999). Creative cognition. In Handbook of Creativity (Sternberg, R.J., Ed.), pp. 189212. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.


Related content

Powered by UNSILO

Teaching innovative design reasoning: How concept–knowledge theory can help overcome fixation effects

  • Armand Hatchuel (a1), Pascal Le Masson (a1) and Benoit Weil (a1)


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.