Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

The proliferation of functions: Multiple systems playing multiple roles in multiple supersystems

  • Nathan Crilly (a1)

When considering a system that performs a role, it is often stated that performing that role is a function of the system. The general form of such statements is that “the function of S is R,” where S is the functioning system and R is the functional role it plays. However, such statements do not represent how that single function was selected from many possible alternatives. This article renders those alternatives explicit by revealing the other possible function statements that might be made when either S or R is being considered. In particular, two forms of selection are emphasized. First, when we say “the function of S is R,” there are typically many systems other than S that are required to be in operation for that role to be fulfilled. The functioning system, S, does not perform the role, R, all by itself, and those systems that support S in performing that role might also have been considered as functioning. Second, when we say, “the function of S is R,” there are typically many other roles that S plays apart from R, and those other roles might also have been considered functional. When we make function assignments, we select both the functioning system, S, and the functional role, R, from a range of alternatives. To emphasize these alternatives, this article develops a diagrammatic representation of multiple systems playing multiple roles in multiple supersystems.

Corresponding author
Reprint requests to: Nathan Crilly, Engineering Design Centre, Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Trumpington Street, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, UK. E-mail:
Hide All
Aurisicchio M., Bracewell R., & Armstrong G. (2013). The function analysis diagram: Intended benefits and coexistence with other functional models. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 27(3), 249257.
Bell J., Snooke N., & Price C. (2007). A language for functional interpretation of model based simulation. Advanced Engineering Informatics 21(4), 398409.
Brown D.C., & Blessing L. (2005). The relationship between function and affordance. Proc. IDETC/CIE 2005: ASME 2005 Int. Design Engineering Technical Confs. Computers and Information in Engineering Conf., Long Beach, CA.
Buchli J., & Santini C.C. (2005). Complexity engineering, harnessing emergent phenomena as opportunities for engineering. Reports of the Santa Fe Institute's Complex Systems Summer School.
Buede D.M. (2000). The Engineering Design of Systems: Models and Methods. New York: Wiley.
Chakrabarti A. (1998). Supporting two views of function in mechanical design. Proc. Workshop on Functional Modelling and Teleological Reasoning: 15th National Conf. Artificial Intelligence (AAAI'98), Madison, WI.
Chakrabarti A., & Bligh T.P. (2001). A scheme for functional reasoning in conceptual design. Design Studies 22(6), 493517.
Chakrabarti A., Shea K., Stone R., Cagan J., Campbell M., Hernandez N.V., & Wood K.L. (2011). Computer-based design synthesis research: an overview. Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering 11(2), 021003-1021003-9.
Chakrabarti A., Srinivasan V., Ranjan B.S.C., & Lindemann U. (2013). A case for multiple views of function in design based on a common definition. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 27(3), 271279.
Chandrasekaran B. (2005). Representing function: relating functional representation and functional modeling research streams. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design 19(2), 6574.
Chandrasekaran B., & Josephson J.R. (2000). Function in device representation. Engineering With Computers 16(3/4), 162177.
Craver C.F. (2001). Role functions, mechanisms and hierarchy. Philosophy of Science 68(1), 5374.
Crilly N. (2010). The roles that artefacts play: technical, social and aesthetic functions. Design Studies 31(4), 311344.
Crilly N. (2013). Function propagation through nested systems. Design Studies 34(2), 216242.
Cummins R. (1975). Functional analysis. Journal of Philosophy 72(20), 741765.
Deng Y.-M. (2002). Function and behavior representation in conceptual mechanical design. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 16(5), 343362.
Devoino I.G., Koshevoy O.E., Litvin S.S., & Tsourikov V. (1997). Computer-based system for imagining and analysing an engineering object system and indicating values of specific design changes. US Patent 6056428.
de Weck O.L., Roos D., & Magee C.L. (2011). Engineering Systems: Meeting Human Needs in a Complex Technological World. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Dym C.L., & Brown D.C. (2012). Engineering Design: Representation and Reasoning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Erden M.S., Komoto H., van Beek T.J., D'Amelio V., Echavarria E., & Tomiyama T. (2008). A review of function modeling: approaches and applications. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 22(2), 147169.
Franssen M., & Jespersen B. (2009). From nutcracking to assisted driving: stratified instrumental systems and the modeling of complexity. Proc. 2nd. Int. Engineering Systems Symp. Engineering Systems: Achievements and Challenges. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Freeman P., & Newell A. (1971). A model for functional reasoning in design. Proc. 2nd. Int. Conf. Artificial Intelligence, pp. 621–640, London.
Frei R., & Serugendo G.D.M. (2011 a). Concepts in complexity engineering. International Journal of Bio-Inspired Computation 3(2), 123139.
Frei R., & Serugendo G.D.M. (2011 b). Advances in complexity engineering. International Journal of Bio-Inspired Computation 3(4), 199212.
Galle P. (2009). The ontology of Gero's FBS model of designing. Design Studies 30(4), 321339.
Gero J.S. (1990). Design prototypes: a knowledge representation schema for design. AI Magazine 11(4), 2636.
Gero J.S., & Kannengiesser U. (2004). The situated function–behavior–structure framework. Design Studies 25(4), 373391.
Goel A., & Chandrasekaran B. (1989). Functional representation of designs and redesign problem solving. Proc. 11th Int. Joint Conf. Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-89), pp. 1388–1394. Detroit, MI: Morgan Kaufmann.
Goel A.K., Rugaber S., & Vattam S. (2009). Structure, behavior, and function of complex systems: the structure, behavior, and function modeling language. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 23(1), 2335.
Gzara L., Rieu D., & Tollenaere M. (2003). Product information systems engineering: an approach for building product models by reuse of patterns. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 19(3), 239261.
Hansson S.O. (2006). Defining technical function. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 37(1), 1922.
Houkes W., & Vermaas P. (2004). Actions versus functions: a plea for an alternative metaphysics of artifacts. Monist 87(1), 5271.
Houkes W., & Vermaas P.E. (2009). Contemporary engineering and the metaphysics of artefacts: beyond the artisan model. Monist 92(3), 403419.
Houkes W., & Vermaas P.E. (2010). Technical Functions: On the Use and Design of Artefacts. Amsterdam: Springer.
Hubka V., Andreasen M.M., & Eder W.E. (1988). Practical Studies in Systematic Design. London: Butterworths.
Hubka V., & Eder W.E. (1982). Principles of Engineering Design. London: Butterworth Scientific.
Ishikawa K. (1990). Introduction to Quality Control. London: Chapman & Hall.
Kitcher P. (1993). Function and design. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 18, 379397.
Kroes P., Franssen M., van de Poel I., & Ottens M. (2006). Treating socio-technical systems as engineering systems: some conceptual problems. Systems Research and Behavioral Science 23(6), 803814.
Lewens T. (2005). Organisms and Artifacts: Design in Nature and Elsewhere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Maier J.R.A., & Fadel G.M. (2009). Affordance based design: a relational theory for design. Research in Engineering Design 20(1), 1327.
Maier J.R.A., Fadel G.M., & Battisto D.G. (2009). An affordance based approach to architectural theory, design, and practice. Design Studies 30(4), 393414.
Maier M.W., & Rechtin E. (2009). The Art of Systems Architecting, 3rd ed.Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
McLaughlin P. (2001). What Functions Explain: Functional Explanation and Self-Reproducing Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Neander K. (1991). The teleological notion of “function.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 69(4), 454468.
Neander K. (1995). Misrepresenting and malfunctioning. Philosophical Studies 79(2), 109141.
Otto K.N., & Wood K.L. (2001). Product Design: Techniques in Reverse Engineering and New Product Development. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Pahl G., & Beitz W. (1984). Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach (Wallace K., Ed.). London: Design Council.
Preston B. (1998). Why is a wing like a spoon? A pluralist theory of function. Journal of Philosophy 95(5), 215254.
Preston B. (2009). Philosophical theories of artifact function. In Philosophy of Technology and Engineering Sciences (Meijers A., Ed.), pp. 213234. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Rosenman M.A., & Gero J.S. (1998). Purpose and function in design: from the socio-cultural to the techno-physical. Design Studies 19(2), 161186.
Roush M.L., & Webb W.M. (2006). Applied Reliability Engineering. Belcamp, MD: Reliability Information Analysis Center.
Searle J.R. (1995). The Construction of Social Reality. London: Allen Lane.
Umeda Y., Takeda H., Tomiyama T., & Yoshikawa H. (1990). Function, behavior, and structure. In AIENG'90: Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Engineering (Gero J.S., Ed.), Vol. 5, pp. 177–19). New York: Computational Mechanics Publications and Springer–Verlag.
Umeda Y., & Tomiyama T. (1997). Functional reasoning in design. IEEE Expert 12(2), 4248.
Van Wie M., Bryant C.R., Bohm M.R., McAdams D.A., & Stone R.B. (2005). A model of function-based representations. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 19(2), 89111.
Vermaas P.E. (2009). The flexible meaning of function in engineering. Proc. Int. Conf. Engineering Design, ICED '09, Stanford, CA.
Vermaas P.E., & Dorst K. (2007). On the conceptual framework of John Gero's FBS-model and the prescriptive aims of design methodology. Design Studies 28(2), 133157.
Vermaas P.E., & Eckert C. (2013). My functional description is better! Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 27(3), 187190.
Warell A. (1999). Introducing a use-perspective in product design theory and methodology. Proc. 1999 ASME Design Engineering Technical Confs., Paper No. DETC99/DTM-8782, Las Vegas, NV.
Winsor J., & MacCallum K. (1994). A review of functionality modelling in design. Knowledge Engineering Review 9(2), 163199.
Wright L. (1973). Functions. Philosophical Review 82(2), 139168.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

  • ISSN: 0890-0604
  • EISSN: 1469-1760
  • URL: /core/journals/ai-edam
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 1
Total number of PDF views: 24 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 288 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 20th October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.