Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Untangling wicked problems

  • Raymond McCALL (a1) and Janet Burge (a2)
Abstract
Abstract

More than 40 years after Rittel and Webber published the first articles on the theory of wicked problems this theory has been applied to a wide range of fields involved in real-world problem solving. Interest in the theory seems greater than ever. This has led to an interest in rethinking the theory. A number of authors do this by imposing interpretations on the theory that are incompatible with each other and with the statements of the theory's authors. We agree that it is time to critically reexamine the theory and rethink what implications it has for design. However, rather than imposing an incompatible interpretation, our approach is see what new conclusions can be drawn from a systematic and critical examination of what Rittel and Webber actually said. This reexamination of their specific claims and arguments is what we call untangling wicked problems. From this untangling, we derive new conclusions about how designers should tackle wicked problems and how design rationale can aid them in doing so.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Reprint requests to: Janet Burge, Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Wesleyan University, Science Tower 655, 265 Church Street, Middletown, CT 06459-012, USA. E-mail: jburge@wesleyan.edu
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

D.K. Arnett (2012). Wicked problems and worthy pursuits: resolving to meet American Heart Association 2020 Impact Goals. Circulation 125(21), 25542556.

P.J Balint , R.E. Stewart , A. Desai , & L. Walters (2011). Wicked Environmental Problems: Managing Uncertainty and Conflict. Washington, DC: Island Press.

R. Buchanan (1992). Wicked problems in design thinking. Design Issues 8(2), 521.

S.J. Buckingham Shum , A.M. Selvin , M. Sierhuis , J. Conklin , C.B. Haley , & B. Nuseibeh (2006). Hypermedia support for argumentation-based rationale: 15 years on from gIBIS and QOC. In Rationale Management in Software Engineering ( A.H. Dutoit , R. McCall , I. Mistrik , & B. Paech , Eds.), pp. 111132. Heidelberg: Springer.

J.E. Burge , & D.C. Brown (2006). Rationale-based support for software maintenance. In Rationale Management in Software Engineering ( A.H. Dutoit , R. McCall , I. Mistrik , & B. Paech , Eds.), pp. 273296. Heidelberg: Springer.

J. Burge , J.M. Carroll , R. McCall , & I. Mistrik (Eds). (2008). Rationale-Based Software Engineering. Heidelberg: Springer.

E.J. Conklin , & M.L. Begeman (1988). gIBIS: a hypertext tool for exploratory policy discussion. ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems 6(4), 303331.

R. Coyne (2005). Wicked problems revisited. Design Studies 26(1), 517.

D. Dunne , & R. Martin (2006). Design thinking and how it will change management education: an interview and discussion. Academy of Management Learning & Education 5(4), 512523.

A.H. Dutoit , R. McCall , I. Mistrik , & B. Paech (Eds). (2006) Rationale Management in Software Engineering. Heidelberg: Springer.

R. Farrell , & C. Hooker (2013). Design, science and wicked problems. Design Studies 34(6), 681705.

P.A. Kirschner , S.J. Buckingham Shum , & C.S. Carr (Eds). (2003). Visualizing Argumentation: Software Tools for Collaborative and Educational Sense-Making. London: Springer.

S.F. Kovacic , & A. Sousa-Poza (2013). Managing and Engineering in Complex Situations. New York: Springer.

J. Mansfield (2010). The Nature of Change or the Law of Unintended Consequences: An Introductory Text to Designing Complex Systems and Managing Change. London: Imperial College Press.

R.K. Merton (1936). The unanticipated consequences of purposive social action. American Sociological Review 1(6), 894904.

H.W.J. Rittel , & M. Webber (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning Rittel. Policy Sciences 4(2), 155169.

H.A. Simon (1956). Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psychological Review 63(2), 129138.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

AI EDAM
  • ISSN: 0890-0604
  • EISSN: 1469-1760
  • URL: /core/journals/ai-edam
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 48
Total number of PDF views: 187 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 583 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 24th September 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.