Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Use of analogies, metaphors, and similes by students and reviewers at an undergraduate architectural design review

  • Fehmi Dogan (a1), Batuhan Taneri (a1) and Livanur Erbil (a1)
Abstract

This study investigates the use of similarities in the form of analogy, metaphor, and simile by students and reviewers in an undergraduate architectural design review. In contrast to studies conducted in vitro settings, this study emphasizes the importance of studying analogies, metaphors, and similes in a natural setting. All similarity relationships were coded according to their type, the level of expertise, range, frequency, goal, value judgment, and depth. The results indicate that analogies, metaphors, and similes were used spontaneously and without any difficulty by both reviewers and students. Reviewers, however, were almost twice as likely to evoke similarities. Metaphor was the most frequently used similarity relationship among the three. It was found that there was a significant relationship between the level of expertise and type of similarity, with students more likely to use analogies and less likely to use similes. It was also found that goal is the most important factor, with a significant relation to all other variables, and that embodiment is often invoked in both students’ and reviewers’ metaphors. We conclude that design education should take full advantage of students’ natural ability to benefit from similarity relationships.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Author for correspondence: Fehmi Dogan, E-mail: fehmidogan@iyte.edu.tr
References
Hide All
Ball, LJ and Christensen, BT (2009) Analogical reasoning and mental simulation in design: two strategies linked to uncertainty resolution. Design Studies 30(2), 169186.
Ball, LJ, Ormerod, TC and Morley, NJ (2004) Spontaneous analogising in engineering design: a comparative analysis of experts and novices. Design Studies 25(5), 495508.
Berger, LL (2013) Metaphor and analogy: the Sun and Moon of legal persuasion. Journal of and Policy 22, 147.
Blanchette, I and Dunbar, K (2000) How analogies are generated: The roles of structural and superficial similarity. Memory & Cognition 28(1), 108124.
Blanchette, I and Dunbar, K (2001) Analogy use in naturalistic settings: The influence of audience, emotion, and goals. Memory & Cognition 29(5), 730735.
Bonnardel, N (2000) Towards understanding and supporting creativity in design: analogies in a constrained cognitive environment. Knowledge-Based Systems 13(7–8), 505513.
Bonnardel, N and Marmèche, E (2004) Evocation processes by novice and expert designers: towards stimulating analogical thinking. Creativity and Innovation Management 13(3), 176186.
Bowdle, BF and Gentner, D (2005) The career of metaphor. Psychological Review 112(1), 193.
Caballero, R (2003) Metaphor and genre: the presence and role of metaphor in the building review. Applied Linguistics 24(2), 145167.
Cardoso, C and Badke-Schaub, P (2011) The influence of different pictorial representations during idea generation. The Journal of Creative Behavior 45(2), 130146.
Casakin, H (2004) Visual analogy as a cognitive strategy in the design process: expert versus novice performance. Journal of Design Research 4(2), 197217.
Casakin, H (2006) Assessing the use of metaphors in the design process. Environment and Planning B 33(2), 253268.
Casakin, H (2010) Visual analogy, visual displays, and the nature of design problems: the effect of expertise. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 37(1), 170188.
Casakin, H (2011) Metaphorical reasoning and design expertise: a perspective for design education. Journal of learning design 4(2), 2938.
Casakin, H (2017) The use of metaphors as design communication tools in an architectural team. International Journal of Contemporary Architecture – The New ARCH 4(2), 6270.
Casakin, H and Goldschmidt, G (1999) Expertise and the use of visual analogy: implications for design education. Design Studies 20(2), 153175.
Chou, A and Shu, LH (2015) Using analogies to explain versus inspire concepts. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 29(2), 135146.
Christensen, BT and Schunn, CD (2007) The relationship of analogical distance to analogical function and preinventive structure: The case of engineering design. Memory & Cognition 35(1), 2938.
Coyne, R and Snodgrass, A (1991) Is designing mysterious? Challenging the dual knowledge thesis. Design Studies 12(3), 124131.
Coyne, R, Snodgrass, A and Martin, D (1994) Metaphors in the design studio. Journal of Architectural Education 48(2), 113125.
Dahl, DW and Moreau, P (2002) The influence and value of analogical thinking during new product ideation. Journal of Marketing Research 39(1), 4760.
Dogan, F (2013) Architectural design students’ explorations through conceptual diagrams. The Design Journal 16(1), 103124.
Dunbar, K (1997) How scientists think: On-line creativity and conceptual change in science. In Ward, TB, Smith, SM & Vaid, S (eds). Creative Thought: An Investigation of Conceptual Structures and Processes. Washington, DC, USA: American Psychological Association, pp. 461493.
Dunbar, K. (1999) How scientists build models in vivo science. In Magnani, L, Nersessian, NJ and Thagard, P (eds). Model-Based Reasoning in Scientific Discovery. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, pp. 8589.
Dunbar, K (2000) How scientists think in the real world: implications for science education. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 2(1), 4958.
Dunbar, K (2001) The analogical paradox: why analogy is so easy in naturalistic settings yet so difficult in the psychological laboratory. In Gentner, D, Holyoak, KJ & Kokinov, BN (eds). The Analogical Mind: Perspectives From Cognitive Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 313334.
Dunbar, K and Blanchette, I (2001) The in vivo/in vitro approach to cognition: the case of analogy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 5(8), 334339.
Fauconnier, G and Turner, M (1998) Conceptual integration networks. Cognitive Science 22(2), 133187.
Gentner, D (1982) Are scientific analogies metaphors? In Miall, D (ed.). Metaphor: Problems and Perspectives. Brighton, England: Harvester Press, pp. 106132.
Gentner, D (1998) Analogy. In Bechtel, W, Graham, G and Balota, DA (eds). A Companion to Cognitive Science. Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 107113.
Gentner, D, Bowdle, B, Wolff, P and Boronat, C (2001) Metaphor is like analogy. In Gentner, D, Holyoak, KJ and Kokinov, BN (eds). The Analogical Mind: Perspectives From Cognitive Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 199253.
Gentner, D and Bowdle, BF (2001) Convention, form, and figurative language processing. Metaphor and Symbol 16(3–4), 223247.
Gentner, D and Markman, AB (1997) Structure mapping in analogy and similarity. American Psychologist 52(1), 4556.
Gibbs, RW (1999) Figurative language. In Wilson, RA and Keil, FC (eds). The MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 314315.
Gick, ML and Holyoak, KJ (1980) Analogical problem solving. Cognitive Psychology 12(3), 306355.
Glucksberg, S (1999) Metaphor. In Wilson, RA and Keil, FC (eds). The MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 535537.
Glucksberg, S and Keysar, B (1990) Understanding metaphorical comparisons: beyond similarity. Psychological Review 97(1), 3.
Glucksberg, S and McGlone, MS (2001) Understanding Figurative Language: From Metaphors to Idioms. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
Goldschmidt, G, Casakin, H, Avidan, Y and Ronen, O (2014). Three studio critiquing cultures: fun follows function or function follows fun? In Adams, SR and Siddiqui, JA (eds). Analyzing Design Review Conversations. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue Publishers, pp. 457483.
Goldschmidt, G, Hochman, H and Dafni, I (2010) The design studio “crit”: teacher-student communication. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing: AI EDAM 24(3), 285302.
Hey, J, Linsey, J, Agogino, AM and Wood, KL (2008) Analogies and metaphors in creative design. International Journal of Engineering Education 24(2), 283294.
Hofstadter, DR (2001) Analogy as the core of cognition In Gentner, D, Holyoak, KJ and Kokinov, BN (eds). The Analogical Mind: Perspectives From Cognitive Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 499538.
Holyoak, KJ (1985) The pragmatics of analogical transfer. In Gordon, HB (ed.). Psychology of Learning and Motivation, Vol. 19. New York: Academic Press, pp. 5987.
Holyoak, KJ (2005) Analogy. In Holyoak, KJ and Morrison, RG (eds). The Cambridge Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 117142.
Holyoak, KJ and Thagard, P (1989) Analogical mapping by constraint satisfaction. Cognitive Science 13(3), 295355.
Holyoak, KJ and Thagard, P (1996) Mental Leaps: Analogy in Creative Thought: Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Holyoak, KJ and Thagard, P (1997) The analogical mind. American Psychologist 52(1), 3544.
Huet, G, Culley, SJ, McMahon, CA and Fortin, C (2007) Making sense of engineering design review activities. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing: AI EDAM 21(3), 243266.
Johnson, M (2013) The Body in the Mind: the Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kalogerakis, K, Lüthje, C and Herstatt, C (2010) Developing innovations based on analogies: experience from design and engineering consultants. Journal of Product Innovation Management 27(3), 418436.
Lakoff, G (1993) The contemporary theory of metaphor. In Ortony, A. (ed.). Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 202251.
Lakoff, G and Johnson, M (1999) Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.
Le Corbusier. (1986) Towards a New Architecture. New York: Dover Publications.
Linsey, J, Wood, K and Markman, A (2008) Modality and representation in analogy. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 22(2), 85100.
Margolis, J (1957) Notes on the logic of simile, metaphor and analogy. American Speech 32(3), 186189.
Murphy, KM, Ivarsson, J and Lymer, G (2012) Embodied reasoning in architectural critique. Design Studies 33(6), 530556.
Nersessian, NJ (2008) Creating Scientific Concepts. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.
Ortony, A (1979) Beyond literal similarity. Psychological Review 86(3), 161.
Ozkan, O and Dogan, F (2013) Cognitive strategies of analogical reasoning in design: differences between expert and novice designers. Design Studies 34(2), 161192.
Srinivasan, V, Chakrabarti, A and Lindemann, U (2015) An empirical understanding of use of internal analogies in conceptual design. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 29(2), 147160.
Stern, J (2005) Metaphor, semantics, and context. In Holyoak, KJ and Morrison, RG (eds). The Cambridge Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 162179.
Tseng, I, Moss, J, Cagan, J and Kotovsky, K (2008) The role of timing and analogical similarity in the stimulation of idea generation in design. Design Studies 29(3), 203221.
Vattam, SS, Helms, ME and Goel, AK (2010) A content account of creative analogies in biologically inspired design. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing: AI EDAM 24(4), 467481.
Venturi, R, Scott Brown, D and Izenour, S (1977) Learning From Las Vegas: The Forgotten Symbolism of Architectural Form. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Visser, W and Maher, ML (2011) The role of gesture in designing. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing: AI EDAM 25(Special Issue 03), 213220.
Vosniadou, S (1989) Analogical reasoning as a mechanism in knowledge acquisition: a developmental perspective. In Vosniadou, S and Ortony, A (eds). Similarity and Analogical Reasoning Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 413437.
Vosniadou, S and Ortony, A (1989) Similarity and Analogical Reasoning. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.
Webster, H (2007) The analytics of power. Journal of Architectural Education 60(3), 2127.
Zahner, D, Nickerson, JV, Tversky, B, Corter, JE and Ma, J (2010) A fix for fixation? Rerepresenting and abstracting as creative processes in the design of information systems. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 24(02), 231244.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

AI EDAM
  • ISSN: 0890-0604
  • EISSN: 1469-1760
  • URL: /core/journals/ai-edam
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed