No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Barriers to the adoption of organic farming by cash-crop producers in Austria
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 30 October 2009
Abstract
Most of Austria's organic farms are located in mountainous areas and produce mainly milk and beef, whereas a low percentage of cash-crop farms are organic. As a result, the demand for organically grown crops cannot be fully met by domestic production. This paper investigates the barriers to adoption of organic agriculture by cash-crop farmers in Austria. In a written survey, 383 conventional farmers provided information on their perception of organic farming and rated the importance of potential barriers to adoption. Technical challenges in cropping and additional labor requirements were rated as the most important barriers, followed by fear of decreased income and marketing problems. Structural and social issues, such as farm size and lack of support from family members, were less important.
Keywords
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2002
References
1.BMLFUW. 2000. Grüner Bericht 1999. Bundesministerium für Land- und Forstwirtschaft. Umwelt und Wasserwirtschaft (Federal Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, Environment and Water Management), Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
2.Duram, L.. 1999. Factors in organic farmers' decisionmaking: Diversity, challenge, und barriers. Amer. J. Alternative Agric. 14:2–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Eder, M. 1999. Wird die Umstellung auf Bio noch interessanter? Top Agrar 8/99 - Österreich Journal, p. 6–8.Google Scholar
4.Freyer, B. 1998a. Umfrage zum umweltgerechten Landbau in den Kantonen BL und BS. Agrarforschung 5:329–332.Google Scholar
5.Freyer, B. 1998b. Umstellung auf IP oder Bio - eine Prognose. Agrarforschung 5:333–336.Google Scholar
6.Freyer, B., Rantzau, R., and Vogtmann, H.. 1994. Case studies of farms converting to organic agriculture in Germany. In Lampkin, N. and Padel, S. (eds.). The Economics of Organic Farming. An International Perspective. CAB International, Wallingford, UK. p. 243–263.Google Scholar
7.Hadatsch, S., and Milestad, R.. 2001. Sustaining farming and farming sustainably – Farmers' notions on sustainability and the potentials for organic farming in the Sölktäler, an Alpine valley in Austria. Paper presented at the EU-COST A12 Meeting on Rural Innovation in Norway, 6–7 06.Google Scholar
8.Häfliger, M., and Maurer, J.. 1996. Umstellung auf Biolandbau - Motivation und Hemmnisse. Agrarforschung 3:531–534.Google Scholar
9.Hollenberg, K., Siebert, R., and Kächele, H.. 1999. Determinanten für die Umstellungsbereitschaft landwirtschaftlicher Betriebsleiter in Brandenburg auf Ökologischen Landbau. In Hoffmann, H. and Müller, S. (eds.). Beiträge zur 5. Wissenschaftstagung zum Ökologischen Landbau ‘Vom Rand zur Mitte’. Verlag Dr. Köster. Berlin, p. 333–336.Google Scholar
10.Kirner, L. 2001. Die Umstellung auf Biologischen Landbau in Österreich. Potential - Hemmnisse - Mehrkosten in der biologischen Milchproduktion. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Agricultural Sciences, Vienna. Austria.Google Scholar
11.Kirner, L., and Schneeberger, W.. 1999. The structure of organic farms and those committed to ‘renunciation of means of production which increase yield’; A comparison in the context of the Austrian Environmental Programme. Die Bodenkultur. Austrian J. Agric. Res. 50:133–141.Google Scholar
12.Kirner, L., and Schneeberger, W.. 2000. Willingness of cash crop farms to convert to organic farming in Austria - Analysis of a written survey. Die Bodenkultur. Austrian J. Agric. Res. 51:135–142.Google Scholar
13.Köhne, M., and Köhn, O.. 1998. Betriebsumstellung auf ökologischen Landbau. Auswirkungen der EU-Förderungen in den neuen Bundesländern. Berichte über Landwirtschaft 76:329–365.Google Scholar
14.Lockeretz, W. 1999. Farm profile: Sörtorp, an organic farm in Sweden. Amer. J. Alternative Agric. 14:37–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Loibl, E. 1999. Die Beweggründe, Biobauer zu werden - Voraussetzungen und Ursachen. Der Förderungsdienst 47:344–346.Google Scholar
16.Michelsen, J., Hamm, U., Wynen, E., and Roth, E.. 1999. The European Market for Organic Products: Growth and Development. Organic Farming in Europe. Economics and Policy, Vol. 7. Department of Farm Economics 410A, University of Hohenheim. Germany.Google Scholar
17.Noe, E. 1999. Who are the organic farmers in Denmark of today? Paper issued for XVII Congress of ESRS, Lund, Sweden, 24–28 August. Website: http://www.agrsci.dk/jbs/eno.Google Scholar
18.Padel, S., and Lampkin, N.. 1994. Conversion to organic farming: An overview. In Lampkin, N. and Padel, S. (eds.). The Economics of Organic Farming. An International Perspective. CAB International, Wallingford, UK. p. 295–313.Google Scholar
19.Schermer, M. 2001. Gründe für den Bio-Ausstieg in Tirol - die Rolle der Kontrolle. In Reents, H.-J. (ed.). Von Leitbildern zu Leitlinien. Beiträge zur 6. Wissenschaftstagung zum ökologischen Landbau. 6–8 March 2001, Freising Weihenstephan, Verlag Dr. Köster. Berlin. p. 87–90.Google Scholar
20.Schneider, R. 2001. Umstellung von Marktfruchtbetrieben im Marchfeld und Weinviertel auf biologische Wirtschaftsweise - Umstellungshemmnisse, Umstellungsprobleme und Wirtschaftlichkeit. PhD Thesis. University of Agricultural Sciences Vienna. Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
21.Sholubi, Y.O., Stonehouse, D.P., and Clark, E.A.. 1997. Profile of organic dairy fanning in Ontario. Amer. J. Alternative Agric. 12:133–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Statistik Austria. 2001. Agrarstrukturerhebung 1999: Gesamtergebnisse über die Land- und Forstwirtschaft.Google Scholar
23.Vogl, C.R., and Hess, J.. 1999. Organic farming in Austria. Amer. J. Alternative Agric. 14:137–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar