Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-05T18:56:02.861Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The economics of organic milk production in California: A comparison with conventional costs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2009

Leslie J. Butler
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of California, Davis, CA 95616 (ljbutler@ucdavis.edu).
Get access

Abstract

Interest in organic dairying is increasing at a rapid pace in California, and the demand for organic milk and dairy products is growing even faster. The intent of this study was to determine the cost of organic milk production, and in particular, to determine the differences in cost of production of organic and conventional milk. Primarily we are interested in whether the differences are due to government-mandated requirements or whether they are the result of optional procedures or personal preferences. Previous studies have indicated that under organic production, the higher net returns observed on organic farming enterprises are due mainly to the lower cost of production. This conclusion is not sustained here. Our results show that the total cost of production on a per cow and a per hundredweight basis is 10–20% higher for organic producers than for conventional producers. While not strongly statistically significant, the differences appear to be due to higher feed costs, higher average labor costs, significantly higher herd replacement costs, and significant transition costs

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.CDFA. 2000. 1999 California Cost of Milk Production: Annual Summary. California Department of Food and Agriculture, Sacramento, CA.Google Scholar
2.Greene, C. 2000. U.S. organic agriculture gaining ground. Agricultural Outlook (April). Economic Research Service, US Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC. p. 914.Google Scholar
3.Lohr, L., and Salomonsson, L.. 2000. Conversion subsidies for organic production: Results from Sweden and lessons for the United States. Agric. Econ. 22:133146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Ogini, Y.O., Stonehouse, D.P., and Clark, E.A.. 1999. Comparison of organic and conventional dairy farms in Ontario. Amer. J. Alternative Agric. 14(3): 122128.Google Scholar
5.Stonehouse, D.P., Weise, S.F., Sheardown, T., Gill, R.S., and Swanton, C.J.. 1996. A case study approach to comparing weed management strategies under alternative farming systems in Ontario, Canada. J. Agric. Econ. 44(1): 118.Google Scholar