Skip to main content Accessibility help

Entrepreneurial outcomes and enterprise size in US retail farmers' markets

  • Gail W. Feenstra (a1), Christopher C. Lewis (a2), C. Clare Hinrichs (a3), Gilbert W. Gillespie (a4) and Duncan Hilchey (a5)...

Recent studies have suggested that farmers' markets are increasingly important contributors to the economic development of rural and urban communities in the US. Yet, little is known about the specific ways and the extent to which farmers' markets contribute to developing their vendors' capacities as entrepreneurs or affect vendors' business success. In this study, we examine the capacities of farmers' market vendors in three states—New York, Iowa and California—and associated entrepreneurial outcomes. In particular, we explore how vendors' business activities and capacities are associated with different sizes of enterprises. A mail survey of up to 400 vendors, from 20 markets in each state, was conducted in 1999 to examine factors associated with business outcomes and vendor capacities. The importance of farmers' markets to small-, medium- and large-size enterprises and the particular contributions that have been most helpful to vendors were identified. Small-scale enterprises are still the most numerous at farmers' markets, making up almost 56% of all vendors. More than half of these enterprises are operated by part-time farmers or market gardeners. We found that the small enterprises had both less business and market experience, and sell at markets closer to home than do medium and large enterprises. Although these vendors with small enterprises have engaged in fewer entrepreneurial activities, made fewer business contacts and acquired fewer skills at farmers' markets, compared to medium and large enterprises they were more likely to consider farmers' markets to be their most important business development opportunity. Although, for these small enterprises, participating informers' markets may not yield financial gains as large as those gained by medium- and large-scale vendors, farmers' markets may be one of the few options for entrepreneurs to maintain and/or enhance their market niche in a community. Key information needs of small-, medium- and large-size enterprises are described, as well as suggestions for ways in which local educational institutions, Cooperative Extension, government agencies and nonprofit organizations can help support these enterprises and enhance community economic development in their regions.

Corresponding author
G.W. Feenstra (
Hide All
Abel, J., Thomson, J., and Maretzki, A.. 1999. Extension's role with farmers markets: Working with farmers, consumers and communities. Journal of Extension 37(5). Available at Web site (verified 08 2002).
Alcantara, L. 1999. Catalysts for growth: farmers markets as a stimulus for economic development. A greenpaper of the Economics Institute. Economics Institute, Loyola University, New Orleans, LA.
Bruhn, C.M., Vossen, P.M., Chapman, E., and Vaupel, S.. 1992. Consumer attitudes toward locally grown produce. California Agric. 46(4): 1318.
Bryant, C.R. 1989. Entrepreneurs in the rural environment. Rural Studies 5:337348.
Carter, S. 1999. Multiple business ownership in the farm sector: Assessing the enterprise and employment contributions of farmers in Cambridgeshire. Rural Studies 15:417429.
Cooper, A.C., Woo, C.Y., and Dunkelberg, W.. 1989. Entrepreneurship and the initial size of firms. Business Venturing 4:317332.
Dillman, D. 1978. Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method. John Wiley, New York.
Elitzak, H. 2000. Food marketing costs: A 1990's retrospective. Food Review 23(3):2730.
Farmers Market Trust and Regional Infrastructure for Sustaining Agriculture. 1999. Barriers and opportunities for direct marketing in the Philadelphia region. Farmers Market Trust, Philadelphia, PA.
Feenstra, G., and Lewis, C.. 1999. Farmers markets offer new business opportunities for farmers. California Agric. 53(6):2529.
Gale, F. 1997. Direct farm marketing as a rural development tool. Rural Devel. Perspectives 12(2):1925.
Gartner, W.B. 1989. ‘Who is an entrepreneur?’ is the wrong question. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 13:4768.
Gillespie, G.W. Jr., Lyson, T.A., and Harper, D.. 1994. Diversified rural livelihood strategies among low-income farm families in the Northeast. Final Report to the Rural Economic Policy Program at the Aspen Institute for Humanistic Studies and the Ford Foundation. Department of Rural Sociology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
Govindasamy, R., Zurbriggen, M., Italia, J., Adelaja, A., Nitzsche, P., and Van Vranken, R.. 1998a. Farmers markets: producers characteristics and status of their businesses. Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics, Rutgers Cooperative Extension, Cook College, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ and the Agricultural Marketing Service, US Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC.
Govindasamy, R., Pingali, A., and Hossain, F.. 1998b. Income distribution comparison of farms with innovative activities: a probabilistic approach. Department of Agricultural Economics and Marketing, Cook College, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ.
Green, G. 1994. Is small beautiful? Small business development in rural areas. Community Devel. Society 25(2):155171.
Heffernan, W., Hendrickson, M., and Gronski, R.. 1999. Consolidation in the food and agriculture system. Report to the National Farmers Union. University of Missouri, Columbia, MO.
Hilchey, D., Lyson, T.A., and Gillespie, G.. 1995. Farmers markets and rural economic development: entrepreneurship, business incubation, and job creation in the northeast. Farming Alternatives Program, Department of Rural Sociology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
Lewis, C. 2000. A case study of the Laytonville farmers market: A rural community market. UC Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education Program, University of California, Davis, CA. Available at Web site (verified 08 2002).
Lockeretz, W. 1986. Urban consumers attitudes toward locally grown produce. Amer. J. Alternative Agric. l(2):8388.
Lyson, T.A. 1986. Who cares about the farmer? Apathy and the current farm crisis. Rural Sociol. 5:490502.
Lyson, T.A., Gillespie, G.W., and Hilchey, D.. 1995. Farmers markets and the local community: Bridging the formal and informal economy. Amer. J. Alternative Agric. 10(3): 108113.
Moline, J. 1997. A growing harvest. Available at Web site http:// (verified 08 2002).
Northdurft, W.E., Vaughan, R.J., and Popovich, M.. 1986. Creating an entrepreneurial farm economy: A new state policy approach. Council of State Planning Agencies, Washington, DC.
O'Farrell, P.N. 1986. Entrepreneurship and regional development: Some conceptual issues. Regional Studies 20:565574.
Podoll, H. 2000. A case study of the Davis farmers market: Connecting farms and community. UC Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education Program, University of California, Davis, CA. Available at Web site http:// (verified 08 2002).
Simon, S. 2000. Pocket farms thrive on smallness, direct sales. Los Angeles Times, 04 13.
Sommer, R. 1981. The behavioral ecology of supermarkets and farmers markets. J. Environ. Psychol. 1:1319.
USDA. 1997. Census of Agriculture, 1997. National Agriculture Statistical Service, US Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC.
USDA. 1998. A time to act. A report of the USDA National Commission on Small Farms. US Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC.
USDA. 2000. Farmers Market Survey Report. Agricultural Marketing Service, US Department of Agriculture, Washington DC. Available at Web site (verified 08 2002).
Vaupel, S. 1985. Direct marketing in California. California Agric. (0910): 46.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

American Journal of Alternative Agriculture
  • ISSN: 0889-1893
  • EISSN: 1478-5498
  • URL: /core/journals/american-journal-of-alternative-agriculture
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed