Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T22:01:35.675Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Introduction to Agora: Reflections on RJR Nabisco v. European Community

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Carlos M. Vázquez
Affiliation:
Georgetown University Law Center
Ingrid Wuerth
Affiliation:
Vanderbilt Law School
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
AGORA: Reflections on RJR Nabisco v. European Community
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2016

References

1 RJR Nabisco, Inc. v. European Community, 136 S. Ct. 2090 (2016).

2 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-1968.

3 Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., 133 S. Ct. 1659 (2013).

4 Stephan, Paul B., Private Litigation as a Foreign Relations Problem, 110 AJIL Unbound 40 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 Id. at 42.

6 Dodge, William S., The Presumption Against Extraterritoriality in Two Steps, 110 AJIL Unbound 45, 49 (2016)Google Scholar.

7 Colangelo, Anthony J., The Frankenstein’s Monster of Extraterritoriality Law, 110 AJIL Unbound 51, 55 (2016)Google Scholar.

8 Id.

9 Bookman, Pamela K., Doublin Down on Litigation Isolationism, 110 AJIL Unbound 57 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

10 Id. at 60.

11 Buxbaum, Hannah L., The Scope and Limitations of the Presumption Against Extraterritoriality, 110 AJIL Unbound 62 (2016)Google Scholar.

12 Vázquez, Carlos M., Out-Beale-ing Beale, 110 AJIL Unbound 68 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

13 Francq, Stephanie, A European Story, 110 AJIL Unbound 74 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.