Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-tn8tq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-20T01:10:17.809Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Oklahoma Court Finds Accused Was Prejudiced by Lack of Consular Notification in Death Penalty Case

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2017

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Avena (Mex. v. U.S.) (Int’l Ct. Justice Mar. 31, 2004), 43 ILM 581 (2004)Google Scholar.

2 Murphy, Sean D., Contemporary Practice of the United States, 98 AJIL 581 (2004)Google ScholarPubMed.

3 Torres v. Oklahoma, No. PCD-04-442 (Okla. Crim. App. May 13, 2004) (on file with author).

4 Torres v. Oklahoma, No. PCD 2004-442 (Okla. Dist. Ct. Okla. County Mar. 18, 2005) (Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law After Evidentiary Hearing on Remand from the Court of Criminal Appeals).

5 Id., slip op. at 3 (on file with author).

6 [Editor’s Note: The court’s opinion described Victor Vribe as director of foreign litigation at the Mexican Ministry of Foreign Relations.]

7 Torres v. Oklahoma, No. PCD 2004-442, slip op. at 6–7 (citation and footnotes omitted).