Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T05:48:46.817Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Texas Court Rejects Presidential Order to Review Consular Notification Death Cases

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 101 , Issue 2 , April 2007 , pp. 478 - 480
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Ex parte Medellín, No. AP-75,207, 2006 Tex. Crim App. Lexis 2236 (Tex. Crim. App. Nov. 15, 2006), at <http://www.cca.courts.state.tx.us/OPINIONS/HTMLOPINIONINFO.ASP?OPINIONID=14711=; see Adam, Liptak, Texas Court Ruling Rebuffs Bush and World Court, N.Y. Times, Nov. 16, 2006, at A25.Google Scholar

2 Avena (Mex. v. U.S.), 2004 ICJ Rep. 12 (Mar. 31); see Sean, D. Murphy, Contemporary Practice of the United States, 98 AJIL 364 (2004)Google Scholar; Dinah, L. Shelton, Case Report: Case Concerning Avena and Other Mexican Nationals (Mexico v. United States), 98 AJIL 559 (2004).Google Scholar

3 Memorandum from President George W. Bush to the Attorney General (Feb. 28, 2005), at <http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2005/02/20050228-18.html= wjohn R. Crook, Contemporary Practice of the United States, 99 AJIL 489 (2005).

4 2006 Tex. Crim App. Lexis 2236 at *1.

5 Id. at *10 (footnotes omitted).

6 Id. at *9.

7 Sanchez-Lamas v. Oregon, 126 S. Ct. 2669, 2686 (2006); see John, R. Crook, Contemporary Practice of the United States, 100 AJIL 926 (2006).Google Scholar

8 2006 Tex. Crim App. Lexis 2236 at *45-46 (footnotes omitted).

9 Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer, 343 U.S. 579 (1952).

10 2006 Tex. Crim App. Lexis 2236 at *67-68 (footnotes omitted).