Skip to main content

The “Equal Environments Assumption” in MZ-DZ Twin Comparisons: an Untenable Premise of Psychiatric Genetics?

  • A. Pam (a1), S.S. Kemker (a1), C.A. Ross (a2) and R. Golden (a1)

The comparison of MZ-DZ twins in behavioral genetics has produced what seems like irrefutable evidence for the heritability of many psychiatric disorders. But such research depends on the validity of the EEA – the “equal environments assumption” – as an underlying premise. In this paper, several empirical studies which support the EEA are critically reviewed in terms of methodology and the way data has been processed in a mathematical model called “path analysis”. It turns out that studies investigating the EEA appear to be largely inadequate in terms of technique, as well as biased in the inferences drawn. Further, the “heritability” estimate – often taken to mean the influence of trait – specific genes – is merely a statistical abstraction derived from a matrix of correlations; this estimate encompasses many buried environmental effects so that “heritability” does not correspond to any underlying DNA structure. In conclusion, many MZ-DZ pedigree studies have dubious scientific value, given the non-viable premise of the EEA, as well as the misleading operational definition of what has been called “heritability”.

Corresponding author
Director of Psychology, Bronx Psychiatric Center, 1500 Waters Place, Bronx, New York 10461, USA
Hide All
1.Ainslie, RC, Olmstead, KM, O'Laughlin, DD (1987): The early developmental context of twinship: some limitations of the equal environments assumption. Am J Orthopsychiatry, 57: 120124.
2.Boring, EG (1923): Intelligence as the tests test it. New Republic, 35: 3537
3.Carey, G, Di Lalla, DL (1994): Personality and psychopathology: genetic perspectives. J Abn Psychol, 103: 3243.
4.Carson, RC, Sanislow, CA (1993): The schizophrenias, in Comprehensive Handbook of Psychopathology. Edited by Sutker, PB & Adams, HE, second etidion.
5.Cassou, B, Schiff, M, Stewart, J (1980): Génétique et schizophrénie: réévaluation d'un consensus. Psychiatrie de l'Enfant, 23: 87201.
6.Cloninger, CR, Rao, DC, Rice, J, Reich, T, Norton, NE (1983): A defense of path analysis in genetic epidemiology. Am J Hum Gen, 35: 733756.
7.Craike, W, Slater, E (1945): Folie a deux in uniovular twins reared apart. Brain, 68: 213221.
8.Eaves, LJ, Eysenck, HJ, Martin, NG: Genes, Culture, and Personality: An Empirical Approach. London: Academic Press, 1989.
9.Ford, BD (1193): Emergenesis: an alternative and a confound. Am Psychol, 48: 1294.
10.Gottesman, II, Shields, J: Schizophrenia – The Epigenetic Puzzle. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1982.
11.Jackson, D (1960): A critique of the literature on the genetics of schizophrenia, in The Etiology of Schizophrenia. Edited by Jackson, D. New York, Basic Books.
12.Kamin, L: The Science and Politics of IQ. Potomac, Maryland, Ehrlbaum, 1974.
13.Karlin, S, Cameron, EC, Chakraborty, R (1983): Path analysis in genetic epidemiology: a critique. Am J Hum Genet 35: 695732.
14.Kendler, KS (1986): Genetics of schizophrenia. Psychiatric Update 5: 2541.
15.Kendler, KS (1993): Twin studies of psychiatric illness. Arch Gen Psychiatry 50: 905915.
16.Kendler, KS, Neale, MC, Kessler, RC, Heath, AC, Eaves, LJ (1993): A test of the equal-environment assumption in twin studies of psychiatric illness. Behav Genet 23: 2127.
17.Kety, S (1979): Disorders of the human brain. Sci Am 241: 202214.
18.Konner, M: The Tangled Wing: Biological Constraints on the Human Spirit. New York, Holt, Rinchart & Winston, 1982.
19.Lewontin, R, Rose, S, Kamin, L: Not in our Genes: Biology, Ideology, and Human Nature. New York, Pantheon, 1984.
20.Lytton, H (1977): Do parents create, or respond to, differences in twins? Dev Psychol 13: 456459.
21.Matheny, AP, Wilson, RS, Dolan, AB (1976): Relations between twins' similarity of appearance and behavioral similarity: testing an assumption. Behav Genet 6: 343351.
22.Morris-Yates, A, Andrews, G, Howie, P, & Henderson, S (1990): Twins: a test of the equal environments assumption. Acta Psychiatr Scand 81: 322326.
23.Plomin, R, Willerman, L, Loehlin, JC (1976): Resemblance in appearance and the equal environments assumption in twin studies of personality traits. Behav Genet 6: 4352.
24.Plomin, R, Defries, JC, McClearn, GK: Behavior Genetics: A Primer. San Francisco, WH Freeman, 1980.
25.Rowe, DC (1981): Environmental and genetic influences on dimensions of perceived parenting: a twin study. Dev Psychol 17: 203208.
26.Rowe, DC (1983): A biometrical analysis of perceptions of family environment: a study of twins and singleton sibling kinships. Child Dev 54: 416423.
27.Sacks, O: The man who mistook his wife for a hat and other clinical tales. London, Duckworth; 1985.
28.Scarr, S, Carter-Saltzman, L (1979): Twin method: defense of a critical assumption. Behav Genet 9: 527542.
29.Torrey, ER, Bowler, EA, Taylor, EH, Gottesman, II: The Biological Roots of Mental Illness as Revealed by the Landmark Study of Identical Twins. New York, Basic Books, 1994.
30.Vandenberg, SG (1984): Does a special twin situation contribute to similarity for abilities in MZ and DZ twins? Acta Genet Med Gemellol 33: 219222.
31.Wallace, M: The Silent Twins. New York, Ballantine, 1986.
32.Wright, S (1983): On “Path analysis in genetic epidemiology: a critique”. Am J Hum Genet 35: 757768.
33.Zerbin-Rudin, E (1972): Genetic research and the theory of schizophrenia. Int J Ment Health 1: 4262.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Acta geneticae medicae et gemellologiae: twin research
  • ISSN: 0001-5660
  • EISSN: 2059-6324
  • URL: /core/journals/amg-acta-geneticae-medicae-et-gemellologiae-twin-research
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed