Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-16T23:48:23.789Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Inheritance of Dermatoglyphic Formulae: I. Ulnar loops in complete or partial symmetrical formulae

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

C. Lázaro
Affiliation:
Universidad de la República, Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias, Laboratorio de Genetica, Montevideo (Uruguay)
R. Kolski
Affiliation:
Universidad de la República, Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias, Laboratorio de Genetica, Montevideo (Uruguay)
L. Olaizola
Affiliation:
Universidad de la República, Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias, Laboratorio de Genetica, Montevideo (Uruguay)
E. Scvortzoff
Affiliation:
Universidad de la República, Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias, Laboratorio de Genetica, Montevideo (Uruguay)

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The results are presented of a study of ulnar loops in complete or partial symmetrical formulae, in all possible combinations, in a sample of 200 families taken at random in the population of Montevideo.

Some partial formulae not only appear in a significantly higher proportion when both parents have them, and in a smaller amount when they lack them, but also seem to be inherited in a higher degree than the theoretical expectancy of the combined chances of the patterns they are made up of.

The authors' conclusions is that there seems to be a basic influence of factors determining the inheritance of independent patterns, plus a second one, resulting from the meeting of some patterns to give a more remarkable genetic effect for the inheritance of partial formulae.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1966

References

Bat-Miriam, M., Guttman, L. E. (1961). A new approach to fingerprints analysis in population studies. Proc. II Internat. Congr. Hum. Genet., Rome.Google Scholar
Becker, E. (1954). Zur Vererbung der Wirbelmuster der Papillarleisten der menschlichen Fingerbeeren. Menschl. Vererb. Konstitutionsl. 32: 106115.Google Scholar
Becker, E. (1960). Zur Vererbung der Bogenmuster der Fingerbeeren. Anthrop. Anz., 23: 294297.Google Scholar
Elderton, E. M. (1920) On the inheritance of the finger-print. Biometrika, 12: 5791 (cit. by H. Cummins & C. Midlo, Finger prints, palms and soles. The Blakiston Co., Philadelphia, 1943).Google Scholar
Grüneberg, H. (1928). Die Vererbung der menschlichen Tastfiguren. Z. Indukt. Abst. Vererbungsl., 50: 7696.Google Scholar
Kolski, R., Scazzocchio, C. (1961). Estudio de frecuencia de caracteres dermopapilares en nuestra población. Rev. Fac. Human. Ciencias, 19: 213224.Google Scholar
Kramp, P. (1954). Familienähnlichkeiten des Hautleistensystems und ihre forensische Bedeutung. Homo, 3(4): 175177 (Biol. Abstr.).Google Scholar
Lamy, M. et al. (1957). Le nombre de dermatoglyphes dans un échantillon de jumeaux. Ann. Hum. Genet. 21: 374396.Google Scholar
Lázaro, C. et al. (1961). Study on dermatoglyphics in 200 pedigrees. Proc. II Internat. Congr. Hum. Genet., Rome.Google Scholar
Lázaro, C. et al. (1963). Theoretical and observed frequencies of finger-print pattern formulae. A.Ge.Me.Ge., XII, 2.Google Scholar
Mueller, B. (1930). Untersuchungen über die Erblichkeit von Fingerbeerenmustern unter besonderer Berücksichtigung rechtlicher Fragestellungen. Z. Indukt. Abst. Vererbungsl., 56: 302382 (cit. by Cummins & Midlo, 1943).Google Scholar
Rife, D. C. (1953). Finger prints as criteria of ethnic relationship. Amer. J. Hum. Genet., 5: 389399.Google ScholarPubMed
Walker, J. F. (1941). A sex-linked recessive fingerprint pattern. J. Hered., 32: 279280.Google Scholar