Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-05-15T00:47:53.225Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Role of Parental Attitudes in the Development of Temperament in Twins at Home, School and in Test Situations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

D.A. Hay  and
P. J. O'Brien
D.A. Hay*
Affiliation:
Department of Genetics and Human Variation, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Australia
P. J. O'Brien
Affiliation:
Department of Genetics and Human Variation, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Australia
*
Department of Genetics and Human Variation, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria 3083, Australia

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In the La Trobe Twin Study, data are collected on temperament and social development in 3-15 year old twins and singletons from four different sources: questionnaires to parents covering development from birth to the present plus the Bristol Social Adjustment Guide completed by the teacher, Sattler's Behavior and Attitude Checklist completed by the tester, and the Qualitative Score on the Porteus Maze Test. Particular stresses are identified which the parents perceive as distinguishing a multiple from a singleton birth. Whereas they perceive no differences between the first and second-born in birth complications, the second-born is judged less favourably particularly in MZ pairs. The distinction continues in the later assessments by the teacher and tester, where in addition the male twins are seen as being different from other children both in cognition and in temperament. It is proposed that social and cognitive development of twins are interrelated and have two unique components, one related to the greater problems accompanying a multiple birth and the other to comparisons between cotwins.

Keywords

TwinsDevelopmentTemperamentSocial behaviorCognitionBristol Social Adjustment GuidePorteus Maze Test
Type
Twin Development and Temperament
Information
Acta geneticae medicae et gemellologiae: twin research , Volume 33 , Issue 2 , April 1984 , pp. 191 - 204
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1984

References

REFERENCES

1.Allen, G (1978): The twinning and fertility paradox. In Gedda, L, Parisi, P, Nance, WE (eds): Twin Research 3: Part A. Twin Biology and Multiple Pregnancy. New York: Alan R. Liss, p 1–13.Google Scholar
2.Allen, MG, Greenspan, SI, Pollin, W (1976): The effect of parental perceptions on early development in twins. Psychiatry 30:65–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Bell, S (1978): An Evaluation of the Bristol Social Adjustment Guides. Unpublished Master's thesis, La Trobe University.Google Scholar
4.Berger, AS, Keith, LG, Ellis, R, Depp, R (1981): The Northwestern University Multihospital Twin Study: III Obstetric characteristics and outcome. In Gedda, L, Parisi, P, Nance, WE (eds): Twin Research 3: Part A. Twin Biology and Multiple Pregnancy. New York: Alan R Liss, p 207–215.Google Scholar
5.Bryan, EM (1983): The Nature and Nurture of Twins. London: Bailliere Tindall.Google Scholar
6.Brown, AM, Stafford, RE, Vandenberg, SG (1967): Twins: behavior differences. Child Dev 38: 1055–1064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Cohen, D, Dibble, E, Grawe, JM (1977): Parental style: mothers' and fathers' perceptions of their relations with twin children. Arch Gen Psychiat 34:445–451.Google Scholar
8.Cohen, DJ, Dibble, E, Grawe, JM (1977): Fathers' and mothers' perceptions and children's personality. Arch Gen Psychiat 34:480–487.Google Scholar
9.Collett, S (1983): Language Development and Play in Twin Children. Unpublished Master's thesis, La Trobe University.Google Scholar
10.Costello, AJ (1978): Deprivation and family structure with particular reference to twins. In Anthony, EJ, Koupernik, C and Chiland, C (eds): The Child in His Family, Vol 4. New York: Wiley, p. 59–79.Google Scholar
11.Dibble, EO, Cohen, DJ (1980): The interplay of biological endowment, early experience and psychosocial influence during the first year of life: an epidemiological twin study. In Anthony, EJ, Chiland, C (eds): The Child in His Family, Vol. 6. New York: Wiley, p 85–117.Google Scholar
12.Drillien, CM (1964): The Growth and Development of the Prematurely Born Infant. Edinburgh: Livingston.Google Scholar
13.Fischbein, S (1984): Self- and teacher-rated school adjustment in MZ and DZ twins. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 33:205–212.Google ScholarPubMed
14.Hay, DA, O'Brien, PJ (1981): The interaction of family attitudes and cognitive abilities in the La Trobe Study of Behavioral and Biological Development. In Gedda, L, Parisi, P, Nance, WE (eds): Twin Research 3: Part B. Intelligence, Personality and Development. New York: Alan R Liss, p 235–250.Google Scholar
15.Hay, DA, O'Brien, PJ (1983): The La Trobe Twin Study: A genetic approach to the structure and development of cognition in twin children. Child Dev 54:317–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Hay, DA, O'Brien, PJ, Johnston, CJ, Prior, M (1984): The high incidence of reading disability in twin boys and its implications for genetic analysis. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 33:223–236.Google Scholar
17.Helwig, JT, Council, KA (eds) (1979): Statistical Analysis System User's Guide. Carey, NC: SAS Institute Inc.Google Scholar
18.Klaus, MH, Kennell, JH (1976): Maternal-Infant Bonding. St. Louis: Mosby.Google Scholar
19.Koch, HL (1966): Twins and Twin Relations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
20.Lytton, H (1980): Parent-Child Interaction: The Socialization Process Observed in Twin and Singleton Families. New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.MacGillivray, I, Nylander, PPS, Corney, G (1975): Human Multiple Reproduction. London: Saunders.Google Scholar
22.Martin, TO, Gross, RB (1974): A comparison of twins for degree of closeness and field dependency. Adolescence 14:739–745.Google Scholar
23.Matheny, AP, Bruggemann, C (1972): Articulation proficiency in twins and singletons from families of twins. Speech Hearing Res 15:845–851.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24.McCall, RB (1977): Challenges to a science of developmental psychology. Child Dev 48:333–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25.Plomin, R, Foch, T (1980): A twin study of objectively assessed personality in childhood. J Pers Soc Psychol 39:680–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26.Porteus, SD (1965): Porteus Maze Test: Fifty Years' Application. Palo Alto: Pacific.Google Scholar
27.Sattler, J (1974): Assessment of Children's Intelligence. Philadelphia: Saunders.Google Scholar
28.Savie, S (1980): How Twins Learn to Talk: A Study of the Speech Development of Twins from 1 to 3. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
29.Stott, DH (1980): Bristol Social Adjustment Guides Manual, 5th Ed. Sevenoaks, Kent: Hodder and Stoughton.Google Scholar
30.Tienari, P (1966): On intrapair differences in male twins, with special reference to dominance-submissiveness. Acta Psychiat Scand 188:42.Google Scholar
31.Vandenberg, SG, Stafford, RE, Brown, AM (1968): The Louisville Twin Study. In Vandenberg, SG (ed): Progress in Human Behavior Genetics. Baltimore: John Hopkins, p 153–203.Google Scholar
32.Very, PS, Hine, NPV (1969): The effect of birthorder upon personality and development of twins. J Genet 114:93–95.Google Scholar
33.Winestine, MC (1980): Twinning and psychological differentiation. In Anthony, EJ, Chiland, C (eds): The Child in His Family, Vol 6. New York: Wiley, p 119–132.Google Scholar
34.Zazzo, R (1960): “Les Jumeaux: Le Couple et la Personne” Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
35.Zazzo, R (1978): Genesis and peculiarities of the personality of twins. In Nance, WE, Allen, G, Parisi, P (eds): Twin Research: Part A. Psychology and Methodology. New York: Alan R. Liss. p 1–11.Google Scholar