Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-lfk5g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-19T14:52:10.179Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

DROUGHT AND THE MAYA COLLAPSE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 December 2007

Richardson B. Gill*
Affiliation:
7707 Broadway 11A, San Antonio, TX 78209, USA
Paul A. Mayewski
Affiliation:
Climate Change Institute, University of Maine, 133 Sawyer Environmental Research Center, Orono, ME 04469, USA
Johan Nyberg
Affiliation:
Geological Survey of Sweden, Box 670, SE-751 28 Uppsala, Sweden
Gerald H. Haug
Affiliation:
Institut für Geowissenschaften, Universität Potsdam, Postfach 601553, 14415 Potsdam, Germany
Larry C. Peterson
Affiliation:
Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science, Marine Geology and Geophysics, University of Miami, 4600 Rickenbacker Causeway, Miami, FL 33149, USA
*
E-mail correspondence to:rbgill@satx.rr.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Between a.d. 760 and 930, millions of Maya disappeared from the Earth. We examine changes in the physical environment in which the Maya lived. The ice-core evidence from Greenland indicates that around the time of the Maya Collapse, a minimum in solar insolation and a low in solar activity occurred, accompanied by severe cold and dryness over Greenland, indicating hemispheric climatic conditions propitious for drought in the Maya Lowlands. In the northeastern Caribbean, sea-surface salinity (SSS) was lowered. The most severe drought of the past 7,000 years devastated the Yucatan Peninsula. Large Maya cities collapsed in four phases of abandonment spaced about fifty years apart around a.d. 760, 810, 860, and 910. A new core taken from Lake Chichancanab in Quintana Roo shows three peak episodes of brutal drought within a 150- to 200-year drought. A marine core from the Cariaco Basin off Venezuela precisely dates four severe drought episodes to 760, 810, 860, and 910, coincident with the four phases of abandonment of cities. The long-term drought appears to have lasted from 760 to 930 in the Cariaco Basin. The climatic changes were the most drastic the Maya had faced in the preceding 1,500 years and the most severe of the preceding 7,000 years.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007
Figure 0

Figure 1. The ecotone dividing the continental and Mediterranean climatic regimes in western Europe has ranged from 36°N latitude along the North African coast to 48°N in northern Burgundy and Germany, a distance of some 880 km (adapted from Crumley 1994:195).

Figure 1

Figure 2. A vertical cross-section along a line running north to south illustrates the main global regions of rising and sinking air and how each region influences precipitation. A small shift of the circulation patterns to the south, especially in Mesoamerica, could move the boundary between wet summer and dry winter and all seasons dry to the south, causing severe problems to cultures dependent on wet summers to provide them with water. In modern times, the boundary between wet summers and dry winters and all seasons dry passes through northern Yucatan. The ITCZ is the intertropical convergence zone (adapted from Ahrens 1988:480).

Figure 2

Figure 3. Locations of the marine sediment core sites discussed in the text. SSS = sea-surface salinity (map adapted from Higuera-Gundy et al. 1999:160).

Figure 3

Figure 4. The severity of drought during the years 1955–1956 for the State of Texas as a whole. The areas of severe drought are indicated in gray; areas of moderate drought are in white. Note the random distribution of severe drought over the state, with areas of moderate drought within the areas of severe drought (adapted from Hatfield 1964).

Figure 4

Table 1. Collapse, abandonment, and evidence of drought

Figure 5

Figure 5. Population history of the Three Rivers region—Río Azul, Río Bravo, and Booth's River along the Belizean–Guatemalan border. Note the demographic disasters at the time of the Preclassic Abandonment, the Hiatus, and the Classic Collapse. On three occasions, the area lost 70% or more of its population. Clearly, demographic disasters were recurring, devastating phenomena, and each coincides with known periods of drought in the Maya Lowlands. The chart is plotted on a logarithmic scale (Adams et al. 1999:196).

Figure 6

Figure 6. Three phases of collapse: a map of the last monument dates at sites of rank order 10 or greater in Adams and Jones's scheme. The lines have been drawn to include some sites whose last dates are known but that have a rank order lower than 10. In addition to the three phases shown, Naachtun's last date was a.d. 761, indicating an earlier phase of its own. All dates from the cities listed in Table 2 are incorporated in this map, except Naachtun (Adams and Jones 1981; Gill 1994:405; Lowe 1985:213–216; Schele and Freidel 1990:381).

Figure 7

Table 2. Starting and ending hieroglyphic dates in the Maya Lowlands

Figure 8

Figure 7. Locations of paleoclimatic studies showing evidence of drought (underlying map adapted from Lowe 1985:2).

Figure 9

Figure 8. Weight percent sulfur (% S) records from the 1993 (left) and 2000 (right) Chichancanab cores, reflecting gypsum (CaSO) content of the sediments. Shaded intervals are interpreted to represent periods of increased evaporation and precipitation, which indicates drought. Note the general agreement of the two records (David Hodell, personal communication 2002).

Figure 10

Figure 9. Sediment bulk density of the 2000 Chichancanab core measured by gamma radiation attenuation. Density peaks correlate with the high sulfur content seen in Figure 8 but reflect higher sampling intensity, as measurements were made every .5 cm along the length of the core. Intervals of high density (shaded areas) are composed of multiple sub-peaks that are spaced 40–50 years apart. Note in particular the three phases of acutely severe drought in the Terminal Classic, which correspond to three phases of collapse seen in the last hieroglyphic dates from large cities (Table 2; Figure 1). Note especially the intensity and duration of the droughts of the Classic Collapse compared with the droughts of the preceding 1,200 years during the time Maya civilization developed to its peak. The calendar-year dates are based on calibrated radiocarbon dates that have errors of ± 50–100 years. The estimated sedimentation rates are assumed to be constant throughout the length of the core. Sedimentation rates may in fact vary. Both factors may mean that the actual dates of specific events were either slightly earlier or slightly later than the dates indicated in the figure. Based on archaeological evidence, the Terminal Classic droughts probably occurred some 50 years later than shown, still within the dating error. Similarly, other droughts may have occurred 50–100 years later than shown, corresponding more closely to the archaeological record (Hodell, personal communication 2002).

Figure 11

Figure 10. Comparison of the 2000 Chichancanab density record (left) with the δ18O record from Lake Punta Laguna (right). Note the similarly of the two peaks in both the density and δ18O signals during the Terminal Classic and Early Postclassic periods (Hodell, personal communication 2002).

Figure 12

Figure 11. Titanium content, in three point running means, of a marine sediment core from the Cariaco Basin in the Caribbean off the Venezuelan coast. The sediments are composed of silt deposited in annual layers from runoff from the Orinoco and other Venezuelan rivers. Lower titanium indicates lower precipitation. The time span covers the Classic Collapse. In the top graph, note the four episodes of especially severe drought at about a.d. 760, 810, 860, and 910.

Figure 13

Figure 12. Fossil shells in lake sediments from the Yucatan Peninsula record sudden and severe droughts. By analyzing the ratio of oxygen isotopes in shells deposited in lake sediments, periods of drought can be identified. More 18O is present in the lake water during times of evaporation—and used in making the shells—because oxygen's lighter isotope, 16O, evaporates more readily. The droughts at the time of the Classic Collapse were far greater than anything the Maya had experienced for 7,000 years (adapted from Alley 2004:65).