Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T03:44:01.292Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of compound composition and silage characteristics on silage intake, feeding behaviour, production of milk and live-weight change in lactating dairy cows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

D. A. Jackson ,
C. L. Johnson  and
J. M. Forbes
D. A. Jackson
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Physiology and Nutrition, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT
C. L. Johnson
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Physiology and Nutrition, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT
J. M. Forbes
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Physiology and Nutrition, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT
Get access

Abstract

An experiment was carried out to investigate the effects of compound composition and silage characteristics on silage intake, feeding behaviour and productive performance of dairy cows during the first 25 weeks of lactation. Over a period of 3 years, 36 lactating British Friesian cows (12 per year), in their third or later lactations, were divided into two groups. The cows in each group received either compound S, in which the principal energy source was cereal starch, or compound F containing a mixture of high quality digestible fibre. Cows given compound F ate 2·2 kg more silage dry matter per day (P < 0·05). The type of compound had no effect on the frequency of silage feeding and the time spent eating was significantly different only over weeks 10 to 25 of lactation (P < 0·05), with cows on compound F spending on average 20 min longer feeding per day. Cows on compound F produced 1·7 kg more milk per day than cows on compound S. Although there were no significant differences in the concentration of milk constituents, compound F was associated with higher yields of milk constituents. Significant differences were found between the years of experiment in the frequency of feeding (P < 0·05) and also in the concentration of milk protein and milk fat. There were no significant differences in the magnitude of live-weight change between treatments or year of experiment.

Keywords

concentratesdairy cowsfeeding behavioursilage
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 52 , Issue 1 , February 1991 , pp. 11 - 19
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barber, W.P., Adamson, A. H. and Altman, J. F. B. 1984. New methods of forage evaluation. In Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition — 1984 (ed. Haresign, W. and Cole, D. J. A.), pp. 161–176. Butterworths, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bines, J. A. 1985. Feeding systems and food intake by housed dairy cows. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 44: 355–362.Google Scholar
Dowman, M. G. and Collins, F. C. 1982. The use of enzymes to predict the digestibility of animal feeds. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 33: 689–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dulphy, J. P., Remond, B. and Theriez, M. 1980. Ingestive behaviour and related activities in ruminants. In Digestive Physiology and Metabolism in Ruminants (ed. Ruckebusch, Y. and Thivend, P.), pp. 103–122. MTP Press, Lancaster.Google Scholar
Forbes, J. M. 1986. The Voluntary Food Intake of Farm Animals. Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
Forbes, J. M., Jackson, D. A., Johnson, C. L., Stockill, P. and Hoyle, B. S. 1987. A method for the automatic monitoring of food intake and feeding behaviour of individual cattle kept in a group. Research and Development in Agriculture 3: 175–180.Google Scholar
Johnson, C. L. 1984. The effect of feeding in early lactation on feed intake, yields of milk, fat and protein and on live-weight change over one lactation cycle in dairy cows. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 103: 629–637.Google Scholar
Krohn, C. C. and Konggaard, S. P. 1976. [Feed intake and social behaviour among group-fed cows in loose housing. 2. Factors affecting individual intake of grass silage given to appetite.] Beretning fra Statens Husdrybrugsforsog No. 441.Google Scholar
Mayne, C. S. and Gordon, F. J. 1984. The effect of type of concentrate and level of concentrate feeding on milk production. Animal Production 39: 65–76.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries for Scotland and Department of Agriculture for Northern Ireland. 1984. Energy allowances and feeding systems for ruminants. Reference Book No. 433. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Mould, F. L. and ØRskov, E. R. 1983/1984. Manipulation of rumen fluid pH and its influence on cellulolysis in sacco, dry matter degradation and the rumen microflora of sheep offered either hay or concentrate. Animal Feed and Technology 10: 1–14.Google Scholar
Mould, F. L., ØRskov, E. R. and Mann, S. O. 1983/1984. Associative effects of mixed feeds. 1. Effects of type and level of supplementation and the influence of the rumen fluid pH on cellulolysis in vivo and dry matter digestion of various roughages. Animal Feed Science and Technology 10: 15–30.Google Scholar
Phipps, R. H., Sutton, J. D., Weller, R. F. and Bines, J. A. 1987. The effect of concentrate composition and method of silage feeding on intake and performance of lactating dairy cows. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 109: 337–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutter, S. M., Jackson, D. A., Johnson, C. L. and Forbes, J. M. 1987. Automatically recorded competitive feeding behaviour as a measure of social dominance in dairy cows. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 17: 41–50.Google Scholar
Sloan, B. K., Rowlinson, P. and Armstrong, D. G. 1987. A note on concentrate energy source for dairy cows in mid lactation. Animal Production 45: 321–323.Google Scholar
Sloan, B. K., Rowlinson, P. and Armstrong, D. G. 1988. Milk production in early lactation dairy cows given grass silage ad libitum: influence of concentrate energy source, crude protein content and level of concentrate allowance. Animal Production 46: 317–331.Google Scholar
Sutton, J. D. 1980. Digestion and end-product formation i n the rumen from production rations. In Digestive Physiology and Metabolism in Ruminants (ed. Ruckebusch, Y. and Thivend, P.), pp. 271–290. MTP Press Ltd, Lancaster.Google Scholar
Sutton, J. D., Bines, J. A., Morant, S. V., Napper, D. J. and Givens, D. I. 1987. A comparison of starchy and fibrous concentrates for milk production, energy utilization and hay intake by Friesian cows. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 109: 375–386.Google Scholar
Thomas, C., Aston, K., Daley, S. R. and Bass, J. 1986. Milk production from silage. 4. The effect of the composition of the supplement. Animal Production 42: 315–325.Google Scholar
Thomas, C. and Rae, R. C. 1988. Concentrate supplementation of silage for dairy cows. In Nutrition and Lactation in the Dairy Cow (ed. Garnsworthy, P. C.), pp. 327–354. Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
Vasilatos, R. and Wangsness, P. J. 1980. Changes in concentrations of insulin, growth hormone and metabolites in plasma with spontaneous feeding in lactating dairy cows. Journal of Nutrition 110: 1479–1487.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed