Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-gs9qr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T04:02:35.420Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Factors affecting the outflow of protein supplements from the rumen. 2. The composition and particle size of the basal diet

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

M. E. Elimam  and
E. R. Ørskov
M. E. Elimam
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9SB
E. R. Ørskov
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9SB
Get access

Abstract

Two experiments were conducted to investigate the effect of the composition and particle size of the basal diet on the outflow of chromium-treated fish meal from the rumen of lactating British Friesian dairy cows, using Cr-concentrations in faeces. A 4 × 4 Latin square design was used and the cows were fed at twice the estimated energy requirements for maintenance in two equal meals.

Fractional outflow rates per h were, 0·079, 0·088, 0·086 and 0·064 for the 1·00 hay: 0·00 concentrate, 0·75 hay: 0·25 concentrate, 0·50 hay: 0·50 concentrate and 0·25 hay: 0·75 concentrate respectively. The difference between 0·75 and 0·50 concentrate was significant (P < 0·05).

Grinding of long dried grass through 40 or 20 mm screens had no significant effect on the outflow of Cr-treated fish meal from the rumen, however fine grinding (5 mm) and pelleting significantly reduced the outflow from rumen (P < 0·05). Fractional outflow rates per h were 0·080, 0·086, 0·088 and 0·047 for the long, 40, 20 mm and the 5 mm and pelleted diets respectively.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 39 , Issue 2 , October 1984 , pp. 201 - 206
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

American Society of Agricultural Engineers. 1967. Method of determining modulus of uniformity and modulus of fineness of ground feed. Agricultural Engineers Year Book, ASAE R2461, p.301.Google Scholar
Balch, C. C. 1950. Factors affecting the utilization of food by dairy cows. 1. The rate of passage of food through the digestive tract. Br. J. Nutr. 4: 361–388.Google Scholar
Davidson, I., Mathieson, J. and Boyne, A. W. 1970. The use of automation in determining nitrogen by the Kjeldahl method with final calculation by computer. Analyst, Lond. 95: 181–193.Google Scholar
Elimam, M. E. 1980. Studies on the rumen outflow rates of protein supplements. M.Sc. Thesis, Univ. Aberdeen.Google Scholar
Elimam, M. E. and Ørskov, E. R. 1981. Determination of rate of outflow of protein supplements from the rumen by measuring the rate of excretion of chromium-treated protein supplements and polyethylene glycol in the faeces. Anim. Prod. 32: 386 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Elimam, M. E. and Ørskov, E. R. 1983. The effect of diet composition and particle size on the outflow of chromium-mordanted protein supplements from rumen of high yielding dairy cows. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 42: 31A (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Elimam, M. E. and Ørskov, E. R. 1983. The effect of affecting the outflow of protein supplements from the rumen. 1. Feeding level. Anim. Prod. 38: 45–51.Google Scholar
Eng, K. S., Riewe, M. E., Craig, J. H. and Smith, J. C. 1964. Rate of passage of concentrate and roughage through the digestive tract of sheep. J. Anim. Sci. 23: 1129–1132.Google Scholar
Ganev, G., ørskov, E. R. and Smart, R. 1979. The effect of roughage or concentrate feeding and rumen retention time on total degradation of protein in the rumen. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 93: 651–656.Google Scholar
Goering, H. K. and Van soest, P. J. 1970. Forage fiber analyses (apparatus, reagents, procedures and some applications). U.S. Dep. Agric, Agric. Handb. No. 379.Google Scholar
Grovum, W. L. and Williams, V. J. 1973. Rate of passage of digesta in sheep. 4. Passage of marker through the alimentary tract and the biological relevance of rate-constants derived from the changes in concentration of marker in faeces. Br. J. Nutr. 30: 313–329.Google Scholar
Hodgson, J. C. and Thomas, P. C. 1975. A relationship between the molar proportion of propionic acid and the clearance rate of the liquid phase in the rumen of the sheep. Br. J. Nutr. 33: 447–456.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, R. J. 1979. A comparison of outflow rates of protein supplements with different particle sized diets and feeding levels in sheep and cattle. M.Sc. Thesis, Univ. Aberdeen.Google Scholar
Mehrez, A. Z. and Ørskov, E. R. 1977. A study of the artificial fibre bag technique for determining the digestibility of feeds in the rumen. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 88: 645–650.Google Scholar
Ørskov, E. R., Fraser, C. and Kay, R. N. B. 1969. Dietary factors influencing the digestion of starch in the rumen and small and large intestine of early weaned lambs. Br. J. Nutr. 23: 217–226.Google Scholar
Ørskov, E. R., Hughes-Jones, M. and Elimam, M. E. 1983. Studies on degradation and outflow rate of protein supplements in the rumen of sheep and cattle. Livest. Prod. Sci. 10: 17–24.Google Scholar
Ørskov, E. R. and McDonald, I. 1979. The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of pasage. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 92: 499–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owens, F. N., Kazemi, M., Galyean, M. L., Mizwicki, K. L. and Solaiman, S. G. 1979. Ruminal turnover rate. Influence of feed additives, feed intake, and roughage level. Misc. Pap. Okla. agric Exp. Stn. No. 104, pp 27–29.Google Scholar
Ruckebusch, Y. 1970. The electrical activity of the digestive tract of the sheep as an indication of the mechanical events in various regions. J. Physioi, Lond. 210: 857–882.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stevenson, A. E., and Clare, N. T. 1963. Measurements of feed intake by grazing cattle and sheep. IX. Determination of chromic oxide in facces using an auto-analyzer. N. Z. Jl agric. Res. 6: 121–126.Google Scholar
Tamminga, S. 1981. Effect of the roughage/concentrate ratio on nitrogen entering the small intestine of dairy cows. Neth. J. agric. Sci. 29: 273–283.Google Scholar
Thomas, F. and Campling, R. C. 1977. Comparison of some factors affecting digestibility in sheep and cows. J. Br. Grassld Soc. 32: 33–41.Google Scholar
Thompson, F. and Lamming, G. E. 1972. The flow of digesta, dry matter and starch to the duodenum in sheep given rations containing straw of varying particle size. Br. J. Nutr. 28: 391–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, A. D. and Tribe, D. E. 1963. The effect of diet on the secretion of parotid saliva by sheep. 1. The dairy secretion of saliva by caged sheep. Ausl. J. agric. Res. 14: 670–679.Google Scholar