Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-gs9qr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T04:37:38.413Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Plant extracts as supplements for lactating sows: effects on piglet performance, sow food intake and diet digestibility

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2016

S.E. Ilsley ,
H.M. Miller ,
H.M.R. Greathead  and
C. Kamel
S.E. Ilsley*
Affiliation:
Centre for Animal Sciences, School of Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
H.M. Miller
Affiliation:
Centre for Animal Sciences, School of Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
H.M.R. Greathead
Affiliation:
Centre for Animal Sciences, School of Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
C. Kamel
Affiliation:
Rue Frères Lumières, 01205 Bellegarde-sur-Valserine, France
*
† E-mail: bgysei@leeds.ac.uk
Get access

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the ability of the plant extracts Yucca shidigera, Quillaja saponaria and a combination (a blend of capsicum, carvacrol and cinnamaldehyde) to stimulate piglet and sow performance when used as supplements in the diets of lactating sows. These extracts were selected for their potential benefits to health, appetite and digestion. Eighty hybrid sows were housed in conventional indoor farrowing crates from day 107 of gestation until weaning. Sows were allocated according to parity, live weight, fatness and past reproductive performance, to one of four dietary treatments: control (C), combination (COM, 100 g/t food), yucca (Y, 200 g/t), quillaja (Q, 250 g/t). Between days 107 to 114 of gestation, sows received 2·5 kg food per day of their respective diet. During lactation food was offered ad libitum with sow food intake (FI) recorded daily. Faecal samples were obtained from sows daily in order to measure diet digestibility using titanium dioxide as an external marker. Piglet live weight and sow P2 backfat were recorded on days 1, 7, 14 and 21 and at weaning on day 23 (s.e.2·5). Piglet live weight and rectal temperature were measured at birth and 24 h of age. Piglet growth between birth and 24 h was significantly affected by sow treatment. Litters from COM sows held the greatest advantage (117 v. C 99, Q 77, Y 107 g per pig per day, P < 0·01, s.e. = 7·9). Piglet body temperature at birth was also higher in COM litters when compared with treatment C (38·58 v. 37·95oC, P < 0·05)). Q and Y piglets were intermediate between the two. Sow treatment had no effect on piglet performance between day 1 and 14 of lactation. However, between days 15 and 21, piglets from COM sows again significantly outperformed all other treatments (COM 290, C 246, Q 235, Y 255 g per pig per day, P < 0·001, s.e. = 9·3). Piglet weights on day 21 were also significantly greater for the COM sows (6878 g v. C 6584 g, Q 6330 g, Y 6498 g, P < 0·05 s.e. = 132). No benefit was seen from supplementation with either yucca or quillaja extracts on piglet growth. Sow FI and P2 backfat loss between parturition and weaning were unaffected by treatment. However, diet digestibility was enhanced by all supplements during week 1 of lactation in terms of dry matter, organic matter and crude protein. It is concluded that some plant extracts may enhance piglet and sow performance prior to weaning.

Keywords

lactationperformancepigletsplant extractssows

Information

Type
Non-ruminant nutrition, behaviour and production
Information
Animal Science , Volume 77 , Issue 2 , October 2003 , pp. 247 - 254
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Aeschbach, R., Loliger, J., Scott, B. C., Murcia, A., Butler, J., Halliwell, B. and Aruoma, O. I. 1994. Antioxidant actions of thymol, carvacrol, 6-gingerol, zingerone and hydroxytyrosol. Food and Chemical Toxicology 32: 31–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ando, S., Nishida, T., Ishida, M., Kochi, Y., Kami, A. and Se, S. 2001. Transmission of herb essential oil to milk and change of milk flavour by feeding dried herbs to lacating Holstein cows. Journal of the Japanese Society for Food Science and Technology 48: 142–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Behboudi, S. and Morein, B. 1999. Quillaja saponin formulations that stimulate proinflammatory cytokines elicit a potent acquired cell-mediated immunity. Scandinavian Journal of Immunology 50: 371–377.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Choa, A. C., Nguyen, J. V., Broughall, M., Recchia, J., Kensil, C. R., Daddona, P. E. and Fix, J. A. 1998. Enhancement of intestinal model compound transport by DS-1, a modified Quillaja saponin. Journal of Pharmacological Science 87: 1395–1399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cline, J. L., Fisher, B. A., Trottier, N. L., Walker, R. D. and Easter, R. A. 1996. Effect of feeding MICRO-AID on stillbirths, pre-weaning mortality, blood oxygen values of piglets and blood urea nitrogen in sows. Journal of Animal Science 74: (suppl. 1) 189 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Donnerer, J., Amann, R., Schuligoi, R. and Lembeck, F. 1990. Absorption and metabolism of capsaicinoids following intragastric administration in rats. Archives of Pharmacology 342: 357–361.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ganesh Bhat, B., Srinivasan, M. R. and Chandrasekhara, N. 1984. Influence of curcumin and capsaicin on the composition and secretion of bile in rats. Journal of Food Science and Technology 21: 225–227.Google Scholar
Hanwell, A. and Linzell, J. L. 1973. The time course of cardiovascular changes in lactation in the rat. Journal of Physiology 233: 93–109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harrell, R. J., Thomas, M. J. and Boyd, R. D. 1993. Limitations of sow milk yield on baby pig growth. Proceedings of the 1993 Cornell nutrition conference for feed manufacturers, pp. 156–164.Google Scholar
Henry, C. J. and Emery, B. 1986. Effect of spiced food on metabolic rate. Human Nutrition and Clinical Nutrition 40: 165–168.Google ScholarPubMed
Herpin, P. and Demaegdt, G. 2000. Yucca gives smaller piglets a better start. Pig Progress 16: 28–29.Google Scholar
Herpin, P. and Le Dividich, J. 1995. Thermoregulation and the environment. In The neonatal pig: development and durvival (ed. Varley, M. A.), p. 57. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, Oxford.Google Scholar
Hoshi, S., Ushino, A., Saito, N., Kusanagi, K. I., Ihara, T. and Ueda, S. 1999. Comparison of adjuvants with respect to serum IgG antibody response in orally immunised chickens. Comparative Immunology, Microbiology and Infectious disease 22: 63–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, P. E. 1992. Postnatal care of pigs. In Neonatal survival and growth (ed. Varley, M. A., Williams, P. E. V. and Lawrence, T.L.J.), British Society of Animal Production occasional publication no. 15, pp. 149–161.Google Scholar
Johnston, N. L., Quarles, C. L. and Fagerberg, D. J. 1981. Broiler performance with DSS40 Yucca saponin in combination with monensin. Poultry Science 61: 1052–1054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kawada, T. and Iwai, K. 1985. In vivo and in vitro metabolism of dihydrocapsaicin a pungent principle of hot pepper in rats. Agricultural and Biological Chemistry 49: 441–448.Google Scholar
Kogure, K., Goto, S., Nishimura, M., Yasumoto, M., Abe, K., Ohiwa, C., Sassa, H., Kusumi, T. and Terada, H. 2002. Mechanism of potent antiperoxidative effect of capsaicin. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1573: 84–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, K.-G. and Shibamoto, T. 2002. Determination of antioxidant potential of volatile extracts isolated from various herbs and spices. Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry 50: 4947–4952.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leone, J. L. 1978. The determination of titanium dioxide in feedstuffs. Journal of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists 56: 535–537.Google Scholar
Maggi, C. A., Evangelista, S., Abelli, L., Somma, V. and Meli, A. 1987. Capsaicin-sensitive mechanisms and experimentally induced duodenal ulcers in rats. Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology 39: 559–561.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meat and Livestock Commission. 2002. Pig yearbook 2002. MLC, Milton Keynes.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. 1986. The analysis of agricultural materials, third edition. Reference book 427. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Minitab Inc. 1998. Minitab for Windows, release 12·2. Minitab Inc., USA.Google Scholar
Nualart, H., Kamel, C., Gasa, J. and Baucells, F. 2000. Effects on faecal digestibility of the inclusion of a formulation of natural plant extracts ona post weaning pig diet from 5 to 15 kg. Proceedings of the European Association for Animal Production, 2000, p. 43.Google Scholar
Platel, K. and Srinivansan, K. 1996. Influence of dietary spices or their active principles on digestive enzymes of small intestinal mucosa in rats. International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition 47: 55–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yen, J. T. and Pond, W. G. 1993. Effects of carbadox, copper and Yucca shidigera extract on growth performance and visceral weight of young pigs. Journal of Animal Science 71: 2140–2146.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yin, Y.-L., McEvoy, J. D. G., Schulze, H. and McCracken, K. J. 2000. Studies on cannulation methods and alternative indigestible markers and the effects of food enzyme supplementation in barley-based diets on ileal and overall apparent digestibility in growing pigs. Animal Science 70: 63–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar