Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-tbj44 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T07:40:02.270Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Repeatability and heritability of fertility in hill sheep

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

A. F. Purser
A. F. Purser
Affiliation:
A.R.C. Animal Breeding Research Organisation, Edinburgh 9
Get access

Summary

Lambing records of 3,500 Scottish Blackface ewes and 2,000 Welsh Mountain ewes were used for a study of repeatability of ewe fertility and litter size. The repeatability of litter size at birth (calculated as an intra-ewe correlation) was higher in both flocks (0.19 and 0.24 for Blackface and Welsh ewes respectively) than that for barrenness (0.09 and 0.08) or for number of lambs born per mating (0.07 and 0.10). Repeatability of the corresponding traits at weaning were generally about half these values.

About two-thirds of the ewes had sires recorded and were used for a heritability analysis. The heritability of litter size at birth in both flocks was higher (0.14 and 0.16 for Blackface and Welsh respectively) than either the heritability of barrenness (−0.03 and 0.03) or of numbers of lambs born per mating (−0.01 and 0.07).

It was concluded that the greatest improvement in numbers of lambs weaned would be obtained by selection on litter size at birth. There would be correlated changes in live-weight (genetic correlations of 0.44 and 0.78 for Blackface and Welsh respectively) but not in fleece weight (genetic correlations of 0.09 and −0.13).

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , January 1965 , pp. 75 - 82
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Coop, I. E., & Hayman, B. I., 1962. Liveweight-productivity relationships in sheep. II. Effect of liveweight on production and efficiency of production of lamb and wool. N.Z.J. agric. Res., 5: 265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purser, A. F., 1963. Current progress in three selection experiments with hill sheep. Proc. XI int. Congr. Genetics., 1: (Abstr.) 270.Google Scholar
Purser, A. F., & Young, G. B., 1959. Lamb survival in two hill flocks. Anim. Prod., 1: 85.Google Scholar
Purser, A. F., & Young, G. B., 1964. Mortality among twin and single lambs. Anim. Prod., 6: 321.Google Scholar
Rae, A. L., 1954. Some suggested improvements for the present day Romney. Massey Agric. Coll. Sheep/arming Annual, p. 155.Google Scholar
Turner, H. N., Hayman, R. H., Triffitt, L. K., & Prunster, R. W., 1962. Response to selection for multiple births in the Australian Merino. A progress report. Anim. Prod., 4: 165.Google Scholar
Young, S. S. Y., Turner, H. N., & Dolling, C. H. S., 1963. Selection for fertility in Australian Merino sheep. Aust. J. agric. Res., 14: 460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar