Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T17:33:05.363Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Calving dates and subsequent intercalving intervals in New Zealand beef herds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

C. A. Morris
Affiliation:
Ruakura Agricultural Research Centre, Private Bag, Hamilton, New Zealand
Get access

Abstract

The calving dates of spring-calving cows in New Zealand Angus and Hereford herds, taken from 350 and 240 herd-years respectively, and the intercalving intervals (CI) of cows in 95 Angus and 73 Hereford herds have been summarized. The relationships of each CI with the calving date which initiated it were also analysed. Results for each breed were analysed taking account of district, herd, year and cow age (in years), a total of 35 890 Angus and 22 397 Hereford records being used. The first-calving date (FCD) was identified for each herd-year, and 0·82 of Angus and 0·75 of Hereford cows were recorded as calving within 60 days of the FCD. On a herd basis, proportionately only 0·27 of Angus and 0·15 of Hereford herds had calving spreads of 80 days or less (defined as the time from the FCD to the last calving date). With barren years ignored, the CIs of cows averaged 370 days (Angus) and 368 days (Hereford). Two-year-old cows had on average a CI of 12 (Angus) or 7 days (Hereford) longer in 1974-75 than older cows, and the differences were both 12 days in 1975-76. Regression analyses showed that, on average, the later the calving date within a herd-year and age group, the shorter the subsequent CI. For cows calving early in the first year, the CI increased by 7 days for Angus and 5·4 days for Herefords for each 10 days before the mean calving date for the breed. There were significant effects of district and cow age on the regression estimates. The overall regressions were not consistent with those derived from British beef industry data.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Harvey, W. R. 1977. Users guide for LSML76. Mixed model least-squares and maximum likelihood computer program. Ohio State Univ., Columbus. (Mimeograph).Google Scholar
Jones, L. P. and Hopkins, I. R. 1980. The effect of correction factors on response to selection in beef cattle. Anim. Prod. 30: 211216.Google Scholar
Kilkenny, J. B. 1978a. Some factors affecting calving intervals of beef cows in commercial suckler herds. Anim. Prod. 26: 355 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Kilkenny, J. B. 1978b. Reproductive performance of beef cows. WldRev. Anim. Prod. 14: (3), 6574.Google Scholar
Montgomery, G. W., Davis, G. H. and Hurrell, G. A. 1980. Interval from calving to first oestrus in autumn-and spring-calving herds in the same locality. Proc. N.Z. Soc. Anim. Prod. 40: 280284.Google Scholar
Morris, C. A. 1980. A review of relationships between aspects of reproduction in beef heifers and their lifetime production. 2. Associations with relative calving date and with dystocia. Anim. Breed. Abstr. 48: 753767.Google Scholar
Morris, S. T., Pleasants, A. B. and Barton, R. A. 1978. Post-partum oestrous interval of single-suckled Angus beef cows. N.Z. Jl agric. Res. 21: 577582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mossman, D. H. and Hanly, G. J. 1977. A theory of beef production. N.Z. vet. J. 25: 96100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nicoll, G. B. and Rae, A. L. 1977. Adjustment factors for Hereford and Angus cattle weights. I. Weight at weaning. N.Z. Jl agric. Res. 20: 269278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, A. R. and Riley, G. M. 1982. Milk progesterone profiles and factors affecting post partum ovarian activity in beef cows. Anim. Prod. 34: 145153.Google Scholar