Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-wlg5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T12:43:47.209Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A comparison of the early behaviour of intensively and extensively reared calves

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

Sheila G. C. Kerr  and
D. G. M. Wood-Gush
Sheila G. C. Kerr
Affiliation:
Edinburgh School of Agriculture, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG
D. G. M. Wood-Gush
Affiliation:
Edinburgh School of Agriculture, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG
Get access

Abstract

This study involved two groups of calves, one group consisted of eight Angus × (Friesian × Hereford) calves born in the late summer and kept with their dams in the field. The other group consisted of 20 autumn-born Friesian calves kept indoors in individual stalls. Similar ethograms and techniques were used to study their behaviour up to 8 weeks of age, thus allowing comparisons to be made of the proportion of time spent in various activities, as well as changes in the sequences of behaviour with age. In general, the activity of the calves of both groups showed a similar trend in development. However, the field calves spent significantly more time in investigatory behaviour while the confined calves showed a significantly higher frequency of investigatory behaviour and indulged in more self grooming. The analysis of behavioural sequences showed few differences in focal points or direction of transitions from one behavioural pattern to another, suggesting that the integration of activities into developing motor patterns in the calf is determined ontogenetically with little modification by the environmental factors encountered in this study. However, the confined calves showed a greater mean number of transitions per hour. The findings are discussed in relation to the welfare of the confined calf.

Information

Type
Papers
Information
Animal Production , Volume 45 , Issue 2 , October 1987 , pp. 181 - 190
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Albright, J. L., Brown, C. M., Traylor, D. L. and Wilson, J. C. 1975. Effects of early experience upon later maternal behaviour and temperament in cows. Journal of Dairy Science 58: 749 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Altmann, J. 1974. Observational study of behaviour: sampling methods. Behaviour 49: 227–263.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Archer, J. and Birke, L. 1983. Exploration in Animals and Humans. Van Nostrand Reinhold, London.Google Scholar
Broom, D. M. and Leaver, J. D. 1978. The effects of group rearing or partial isolation on later social behaviour of calves. Animal Behaviour 26: 1255–1267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brownlee, A. 1950. Studies in the behaviour of domestic cattle in Britain. Bulletin of Animal Behaviour 8: 11–20.Google Scholar
Brownlee, A. 1954. Play in domestic cattle in Britain: an analysis of its nature. British Veterinary Journal 110: 48–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burghardt, G. M. 1984. On the origins of play. In Play in Animals and Humans (ed. Smith, P. K.), pp. 5–41. Basil Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
Dennison, S. G. C. 1985. The development of behaviour patterns and an assessment of temperament of dairy heifers. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Donaldson, S. L., Albright, J. L. and Black, W. C. 1972. Primary social relationships and cattle behaviour. Proceedings of the Indian Academv of Sciences 81: 352–354.Google Scholar
Duncan, I. J. H., Savory, C. J. and Wood-Gush, D. G. M. 1978. Observations on the reproductive behaviour of domestic fowl in the wild. Applied Animal Ethology 4: 29–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewbank, R. 1969. The frequency and duration of the nursing periods in single suckled Hereford beef cows. British Veterinary Journal 125: IX–X.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hafez, E. S. E. and Bouissou, M. F. 1975. The behaviour of cattle. In The Behaviour of Domestic Animals (ed. Hafez, E. S. E.), pp. 203–245. Bailliere Tindall, London.Google Scholar
Immelman, K. 1976. Einfuhrung in die Verhaltensforschung. Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
Inglis, I. R. 1983. Towards a cognitive theory of exploratory behaviour. In Exploration in Animals and Humans (ed. Archer, J. and Birke, L.), pp. 72–116. Von Nostrand Reingold, London.Google Scholar
Kelley, R. B. 1943. Zebu cross cattle in Northern Australia. An ecological experiment. Bulletin, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research in Australia, No. 172.Google Scholar
Kiley-Worthington, M. 1977. The Behavioural Problems of Farm Animals. Oriel Press, London.Google Scholar
Kiley-Worthington, M. 1983. The behaviour of confined calves raised for veal: are these animals distressed? International Journal of the Study of Animal Problems 4: 198–213.Google Scholar
Le Neindre, P. 1982. Cow-calves relationships: the effects of management type. In Welfare and Husbandry of Calves (ed. Signoret, J.-P.), pp. 24–35. Martinus Nijhoff, London.Google Scholar
Le Neindre, P. and Garel, J.-P. 1976. Existence d'une periode sensible pour Pestablishment du comportement material de la vache apres la mise bas. Biology of Behaviour 1: 217–221.Google Scholar
Le Neindre, P. and Garll, J.-P. 1977. Étude des relationships mere-jeune chez les bovins domestiques. Comparaisons des liaisons existant entre la mère et des veaux légitimes ou adoptés. Biology of Behaviour 2: 39–49.Google Scholar
Le Neindre, P. and Garel, J.-P. 1979. Adoption of foster calves by Salers cows several days after calving. Annales de Zootechnie 28: 231–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Neindre, P., Menard, M. F. and Garel, J.-P. 1979. Suckling and drinking behaviour of new born calves of beef or dairy cows. Annales de Recherches Veterinaires 10: 211–212.Google ScholarPubMed
Le Neindre, P. and Sourd, C. 1984. Influence of rearing conditions from birth to six months of age on subsequent social behaviour of Friesian and Saler heifers. Applied Animal Ethology 12: 43–52.Google Scholar
Miller, C., Wood-Gush, D. G. M. and Martin, P. 1986. The effect of rearing systems on the responses of calves to novelty. Biology of Behaviour 11: 50–60.Google Scholar
Murphy, R. M., Duarte, K. A. M. and Penedo, M. C. T. 1980. Approachability of bovine cattle in pastures: breed comparisons and breed × treatment analysis. Behavior Genetics 10: 171–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicol, A. M. and Sharafeldin, M. A. 1975. Observations on the behaviour of single-suckled calves from birth to 120 days. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 35: 221–230.Google Scholar
Reinhardt, V. 1980. Untersuchung zum sozialverhalten des Rindes. In Aktuelle Arbeiten zur Artgemassen Tierhaltung, Vol. 10, pp. 1–89. KTBL, Darmstadt.Google Scholar
Reinhardt, V., Mutiso, F. M. and Reinhardt, A. 1978. Social behaviour and social relationships between female and male prepubertal bovine calves (Bos indicus). Applied Animal Ethology 4: 43–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinhardt, V., Reinhardt, A. and Mutiso, F. M. 1977. Cow-calf relationship in Masai cattle. 28th Annual Meeting of the European Association of Animal Production, Brussels, Paper M/1. 04/1-7.Google Scholar
Roy, J. H. B., Shillam, K. W. E. and Palmer, J. 1955. The out-door rearing of calves on grass with special reference to growth rate and grazing behaviour. Journal of Dairy Research 22: 252–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slater, P. J. B. 1973. Describing sequences of behaviour. In Perspectives in Ethology (ed. Bateson, P. P. G. and Klopfer, P. H.), pp. 131–153. Plenum Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stolba, A. 1984. Verhaltensmuster von Hausschweinen in einen Freigehege. In Aktuelle Arbeiten zur Artgemassen Tierhaltung, Vol. 229, pp. 106–116. KTBL, Darmstadt.Google Scholar
Tuiloh, N. M. 1961. Behaviour of cattle in yards. II. A study of temperament. Animal Behaviour 9: 25–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, D. M. 1962. Suckling and grazing behaviour of beef heifers and calves. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 5: 331–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warnick, V. D., Arave, C. W. and Mickelson, C. H. 1977. Effects of group, individual, and isolated rearing of calves on weight gain and behaviour. Journal of Dairy Science 60: 947–953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waterhouse, A. 1978. The effects of pen conditions on the development of calf behaviour. Applied Animal Ethology 4: 285–286 (Abstr.).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, A. J. F., Saville, C., Church, B. M., Gnanasakthy, A. and Moss, R. 1985. The effect of different rearing systems on the development of calf behaviour. British Veterinary Journal 141: 249–264.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wells, S. M. and Goldschmidt-Rothschild, B. Von. 1979. Social behaviour and relationships in a herd of Carmargue horses. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 49: 363–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilt, J. G. De 1985. Behaviour and Welfare of Veal Calves in Relation to Husbandry Systems. Instituut Voor Mechanisatie, Arbeid en Gebouwen, Wageningen.Google Scholar
Wood-Gush, D. G. M., Hunt, K., Carson, K. and Dennison, S. G. C. 1984. The early behaviour of suckler calves in the field. Biology of Behaviour 9: 295–306.Google Scholar