Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-qc88w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-08T00:04:30.884Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparisons between genetic variances estimated from different types of relatives in dairy cattle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

P. M. Visscher  and
R. Thompson
P. M. Visscher
Affiliation:
Institute of Cell, Animal and Population Biology, University of Edinburgh, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JT
R. Thompson
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics Research, Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9PS
Get access

Abstract

Genetic variances were estimated from different types of relatives for a data set of 19038 first lactation fat yield (FY) and fat concentration (FC) records. For FY, h2 estimates were 0·377, 0·322 and 0·377 from an animal model, a sire model and a model using only female relationships. The corresponding estimates for FC were 0·632, 0·628 and 0·610. Regarding sires with most progeny in the data set as levels of a fixed effect slightly increased h2 estimates, most likely through accounting for selection of proven sires. Statistical models were presented to account for heterogeneous genetic variances for males and females in the prediction of breeding values or in estimating variance components. Simultaneously estimating genetic variances for FY from paternal half-sibs, maternal half-sibs, and daughter-dam comparisons, resulted in heterogeneous genetic variance estimates from male v. female comparisons and similar variance estimates from mhs and dd comparisons. For FC, h2 estimates from different types of relatives were similar.

Dam-daughter comparisons provide 0·75 to 0·80 of the information on heritability from female relationships and provide 0·42 to 0·55 of the total information on heritability.

Keywords

dairy cattlegenetic varianceheritabilitymathematical modelsmilk fat

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 55 , Issue 3 , December 1992 , pp. 315 - 320
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Bell, B. R., McDaniel, B. T. and Robison, O. W. 1985. Effect of cytoplasmic inheritance on production traits of dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 68: 2038–2051.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beniwal, B. K., Thompson, R. and Hill, W. G. 1991. Estimates of genetic parameters for lean mass in long-term selection with mice. Animal Production 52: 562 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Ducrocq, V., Boichard, D., Bonaiti, B., Barbat, A. and Briend, M. 1990. A pseudo-absorption strategy for solving animal model equations for large dat a files. Journal of Dairy Science 73: 1945–1955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graser, H-U, Smith, S. P. and Tier, B. 1987. A derivative-free approach for estimating variance components in animal models by Restricted Maximum Likelihood. Journal of Animal Science 64: 1362–1370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, W. G., Edwards, M. R., Ahmed, M.-K. A. and Thompson, R. 1983. Heritability of milk yield and composition at different levels and variability of production. Animal Production 36: 59–68.Google Scholar
Jones, L. P. and Goddard, M. E. 1990. Five years experience with the animal model for dairy cattle evaluations in Australia. Proceedings of the fourth world congress on genetics applied to livestock production, Edinburgh, Vol. XIII, pp. 382–385.Google Scholar
Maijala, K. and Hanna, M. 1974. Reliable phenotypic and genetic parameters in dairy cattle. Proceedings of the first world congress on genetics applied to livestock production, Madrid, Vol. I, pp. 541–563.Google Scholar
Meyer, K. 1983. Scope for evaluating dairy sires using first and second lactatio n records. Livestock Production Science 10: 531–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, H. D. and Thompson, R. 1971. Recovery of interblock-information when block sizes are unequal. Biometrika 58: 545–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, S. P. and Graser, H.-U. 1986. Estimating variance components in a class of mixed models by restricted maximum likelihood. Journal of Dairy Science 69: 1156–1165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swalve, H. and Van Vleck, L. D. 1987. Estimation of genetic (co)variances for milk yield in first three lactations using an animal model and restricted maximum likelihood. Journal of Dairy Science 70: 842–849.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thompson, R. 1977. The estimation of heritability with unbalanced data. II. Data available on more than two generations. Biometrics 33: 497–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van der Werf, J. H. J. 1992. Restricted maximum likelihood estimation of additive genetic variance when selected base animals are considered fixed. Journal of Animal Science 70: 1068–1076.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Vleck, L. D. 1985. Including records of daughters of selected bulls in estimation of sire components of variance. Journal of Dairy Science 68: 2396–2407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Vleck, L. D. 1986. Evaluation of dairy cattle breeding programs: specialised milk production. Proceedings of the third ivorld congress on genetics applied to livestock production, Lincoln, Nebraska, Vol. IX, pp. 141–152.Google Scholar
Van Vleck, L. D. and Dong, M. C. 1988. Genetic (co)variances for milk, fat, and protein yield in Holsteins using an animal model. Journal of Dairy Science 71: 3040–3046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Visscher, P. M. and Thompson, R. 1990. REML estimates of parameters for fat yield in pedigree herds in the UK using an individual animal model; male and female heritability estimates. Proceedings of the fourth world congress on genetics applied to livestock production, Edinburgh, Vol. XIV, pp. 233–236.Google Scholar
Visscher, P. M. and Thompson, R. 1992. Univariate and multivariate parameter estimates for milk production traits in lactations 1–3 using an animal model. I. Description of analyses and presentation of REML estimates. Genetics, Selection and Evolution In press.Google Scholar
Visscher, P. M., Thompson, R. and Hill, W. G. 1991. Estimation of genetic and environmental variances for fat yield in individual herd s and an investigation into heterogeneity of variance between herds. Livestock Production Science 28: 273–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiggans, G. R., Misztal, I. and Van Vleck, L. D. 1988. Implementation of an Animal Model for genetic evaluation of dairy cattle in the United States. Journal of Dairy Science 71: suppl. 2, pp. 54–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar