Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T15:06:02.829Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The continuum between preferences and aversions for flavoured foods in sheep conditioned by administration of casein doses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2016

G. Arsenos  and
I. Kyriazakis
G. Arsenos
Affiliation:
Animal Biology Division, Scottish Agricultural College, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG
I. Kyriazakis
Affiliation:
Animal Biology Division, Scottish Agricultural College, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG
Get access

Abstract

The main objective of the experiment was to investigate whether a continuum links the development of conditioned flavour preferences and conditioned flavour aversions (CFPs and CFAs) in sheep, towards food flavours associated with intraruminal administration of increasing doses of the same nutritive stimulus: casein. A secondary objective was to investigate the effects of dose of casein administration and the number of repeated exposures to casein on the rate of establishment, magnitude and degree of persistence of developed CFPs and CFAs.

The experiment consisted of three conditioning periods (each lasted 8 days). A food with low crude protein (CP) (39.3 g/kg dry matter (DM)) and metabolizable energy (ME) (5.3 MJ/kg DM) contents was used in combination with one of two flavours, orange and aniseed, on a total of 48 Texel × Greyface male, 3-month-old sheep. The sheep were conditioned to associate one flavour added to the test food with a particular dose of casein (C) suspended in water (8.75, 17.5, 35 and 52.5 g per animal), or a different flavoured test food with an equal amount of water. Each dose was administered by gavage through a stomach tube twice daily to each animal. At the end of each conditioning period the preference for the two flavours was measured by a two choice preference test between the two flavoured test foods for 40 min. After the completion of the last conditioning period, three more preference tests (persistence tests), without any intervening exposure to the flavoured test food, were conducted at 7, 21 and 35 days. Preference for the flavoured test food paired with casein was affected by the interaction (P < 0·001) between the dose of casein and casein association respectively. Association with casein (DPR: intake of a flavoured test food paired with casein per g total intake of flavoured test foods during the preference test) led to CFPs (DPR > 0·70) at the two lowest and to CFAs (DPR < 0·30) at the two highest doses. CFPs and CFAs were established by the second conditioning and there was no difference in the rate of establishment between preferences and aversions. The persistence tests showed a strong and similar degree of persistence of both formed CFPs and CFAs, since these were not affected by time of persistence test or by any of the interactions with time. In view of these results a model is proposed which could account for the conditioned responses of sheep towards administration of increasing doses of the same nutrient. The existence of a continuum between CFPs and CFAs created by the same nutrient given at different doses, could be the basis of how ruminants select a diet which meets their nutrient requirements at a particular point in time and thereby avoid excess of nutrient intake.

Keywords

caseinconditioningflavourfood preferencessheep
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Science , Volume 68 , Issue 4 , June 1999 , pp. 605 - 616
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agricultural and Food Research Council. 1993. Energy and protein requirements of ruminants: an advisory manual by AFRC Technical Committee on Responses to Nutrients. CAB International, Wallingford.Google Scholar
Booth, A. 1985. Food conditioned eating preferences and aversions with interceptive elements — conditioned appetites and satiates. Annales of the New York Academy of Sciences 443: 22–41.Google Scholar
Campbell, D. H., Capaldi, E. D. and Myers, D. E. 1987. Conditioned flavour preferences as a function of deprivation level: preferences or aversions? Animal Learning and Behaviour 15: 193–200.Google Scholar
Chowdhury, S. A., Ørskov, E. R., Hoveli, D. B., Scaife, J. R. and Mollison, G. 1997. Protein utilisation during energy undernutrition in sheep sustained by intragastric infusion: effects of protein infusion level, with or without sub-maintenance amounts of energy from volatile fatty acids, on energy and protein metabolism. British Journal of Nutrition 77: 565–576.Google Scholar
Egan, J. K. and Doyle, P. T. 1985. Effects of intraruminal infusion of urea on the response in voluntary food intake by sheep. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 36: 483–495.Google Scholar
Elston, D. A., Illius, A. W. and Gordon, I. J. 1996. Assessment of preference among a range of options using log ratio analysis. Ecology 77: 2538–2548.Google Scholar
Farnsworth, K. D. and Illius, A. W. 1998. Optimal diet choice for large herbivores: an extended contingency model. Functional Ecology 12: 74–81.Google Scholar
Horgan, G. M. and Sword, A. M. 1995. Statistical methods for repeated measures data. Biomathematics and statistics Scotland. University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Huber, J. T. and Herrera-Saldana, R. 1994. Synchrony of protein and energy supply to enhance fermentation. In Principles of protein nutrition in ruminants (ed. Asplund, J. M.), pp. 113–126. CRC Press, London.Google Scholar
Hume, I. D., Moir, R. J. and Somers, M. 1970. Synthesis of microbial protein in the rumen. I. Influence of the level of nitrogen intake. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 21: 283–296.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. A. and Siebert, B. D. 1987. The effect of supplements of rumen-degradable protein and formaldehyde-treated casein on the intake of low-nitrogen roughages by Bos taunts and Bos indicus steers at different stages of maturity. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 38: 208–218.Google Scholar
Kyriazakis, I. 1997. The nutritional choices of farm animals: to eat or what to eat? In Animal choices (ed. Forbes, J. M., Lawrence, T. L. J., Rodway, R. G. and Varley, M. A.), British Society of Animal Science occasional publication no. 20, pp. 55–65.Google Scholar
Kyriazakis, I., Anderson, D. H. and Duncan, A. J. 1998. Conditioned flavour aversions in sheep: the relationship between the dose rate of a secondary plant compound and the acquisition and persistence of aversions. British Journal of Nutrition 79: 55–62.Google Scholar
Kyriazakis, I., Emmans, G. C. and Whittemore, C. T. 1991. The ability of pigs to control their protein intake when fed in three different ways. Physiology and Behaviour 50: 1197–1203.Google Scholar
Kyriazakis, I. and Oldham, J. D. 1993. Diet selection in sheep: the ability of growing lambs to select a diet that meets their crude protein (nitrogen × 6-25) requirements. British Journal of Nutrition 69: 617–629.Google Scholar
Kyriazakis, I. and Oldham, J. D. 1997. Food intake and diet selection in sheep: the effect of manipulating the rates of digestion of carbohydrates and protein of the foods offered as a choice. British Journal of Nutrition 77: 248–254.Google Scholar
Kyriazakis, I., Papachristou, T. G., Duncan, A. J. and Gordon, I. J. 1997. Mild conditioned food aversions developed by sheep towards flavours associated with plant secondary compounds. Journal of Chemical Ecology 23: 727–745.Google Scholar
Launchbaugh, K. L. and Provenza, F. D. 1994. The effect of flavor concentration and toxin dose on the formation and generalisation of flavor aversions in lambs. Journal of Animal Science 72: 10–13.Google Scholar
Lawes Agricultural Trust. 1993. Genstat 5 release 3.2 reference manual, second edition. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Liu, S. M., Lobley, G. E., Macleod, N. A., Kyle, D. J., Chen, X. B. and Ørskov, E. R. 1995. Effects of long-term protein excess or deficiency on whole-body protein turnover in sheep nourished by intragastric infusion of nutrients. British Journal of Nutrition 73: 829–839.Google Scholar
Meissner, H. H., Smuts, M., Van Niekerk, W. A. and Acheampong-Boatend, O. 1993. Rumen ammonia concentrations, and non-ammonia nitrogen passage to and apparent absorption from the small intestine of sheep ingesting subtropical, temperate, and tannin-containing forages. South African Journal of Animal Science 23: 92–97.Google Scholar
Nicholson, J. W. G., Charmley, E. and Bush, R. S. 1992. The effect of supplemental protein source on ammonia levels in rumen fluid and blood and intake of alfalfa silage by beef cattle. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 72: 853–862.Google Scholar
Ørskov, E. R. 1988. Protein nutrition in ruminants, second edition. Academic Press Ltd, London.Google Scholar
Perez, C., Ackroff, K. and Sclafani, A. 1995. Carbohydrate and protein conditioned flavour preferences: effects of nutrient preloads. Physiology and Behaviour 59: 467–474.Google Scholar
Provenza, F. D. 1995. Postingestive feedback as an elementary determinant of food preference and intake in ruminants. Journal of Range Management 48: 2–17.Google Scholar
Provenza, F. D. 1996. Acquired aversions as the basis for varied diets of ruminants foraging on rangelands. Journal of Animal Science 74: 2010–2020.Google Scholar
Provenza, F. D., rtega-Reyes, L., Scott, C.B., Lynch, J. J. and Burritt, E. A. 1994. Antiemetic drugs attenuate food aversions in sheep. Journal of Animal Science 72: 1989–1994.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Provenza, F. D. and Ralphs, M. H. 1987. Diet learning by domestic ruminants: theory, evidence and practical implications. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 18: 211–232.Google Scholar
Ralphs, M. H., Provenza, F. D., Wiedmeier, R. D. and Bunderson, F. B. 1995. Effects of energy source and food flavor on conditioned preferences in sheep. Journal of Animal Science 73: 1651–1657.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rooke, J. A., Lee, N. H. and Armstrong, D. G. 1987. The effects of intraruminal infusion of urea, casein, glucose syrup and a mixture of casein and glucose syrup on nitrogen digestion in the rumen of cattle receiving grass silage diets. British Journal of Nutrition 57: 89–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rozin, P. N. and Schulkin, J. 1991. Food selection. In Handbook of behavioral neurobiology: neurobiology of food and fluid intake (ed. Strieker, E. M.), pp. 297–328. Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
Russell, J. B., Sniffen, C. J. and Van Soest, P. J. 1982. Effect of carbohydrate limitation on degradation and utilisation of casein by mixed rumen bacteria. Journal of Dairy Science 66: 763–775.Google Scholar
Sclafani, A. 1994. How food preferences are learned: laboratory animal models. Symposium on ‘Basic mechanisms of food preference and linking’. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 54: 419–427.Google Scholar
Tolkamp, B. J., Kyriazakis, I., Oldham, J. D., Lewis, M., Dewhurst, R. D. and Newbold, J. R. 1998. Diet choice in dairy cows. II. Selection for metabolizable protein or for rumen degradable protein? Journal of Dairy Science 81: 2670–2680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urbaniak, M. 1995. Effects of blood meal, fish meal, soybean meal or casein on rumen protein metabolism in lambs. Small Ruminant Research 18: 207–212.Google Scholar
Van Soest, P. J. 1994. Nutritional ecology of the ruminant, second edition,pp. 290–311. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Villalba, J. J. and Provenza, F. D. 1997. Preference for flavoured floods by lambs conditioned with intraruminal administration of nitrogen. British Journal of Nutrition 78: 545–561.Google Scholar
Wang, J. and Provenza, F. D. 1996. Food preference and acceptance of novel foods by lambs depend on the composition of the basal diet. Journal of Animal Science 74: 2349–2354.Google Scholar