Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-tfzs5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-01T17:35:44.980Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Controlling inbreeding in dairy MOET nucleus schemes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

Z. W. Luo ,
J. A. Woolliams  and
R. Thompson
Z. W. Luo
Affiliation:
Roslin Institute (Edinburgh), Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9PS
J. A. Woolliams
Affiliation:
Roslin Institute (Edinburgh), Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9PS
R. Thompson
Affiliation:
Roslin Institute (Edinburgh), Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9PS
Get access

Abstract

A nucleus dairy population using multiple ovulation and embryo transfer (MOET) was stochastically modelled with overlapping generations. The aim was to investigate the feasibility of controlling inbreeding in MOET breeding schemes using more realistic parameters for embryo recovery and best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) for genetic evaluation. Four different cases (involving the culling of donors, more donors and the use of organized progeny testing of nucleus bulls) were studied in combination with nested and factorial designs. Further studies involved modifications of the selection index, including subtracting parental breeding values, inflating the genetic variance in the BLUP evaluation and penalizing inbred animals; these options were examined both with and without organized progeny testing. The effects of applying these schemes on both genetic response and rate of inbreeding were investigated. The results stressed the importance of incorporating progeny testing into MOET schemes for value of reducing inbreeding whilst maintaining genetic progress. There was no significant difference between nested and factorial designs. In the absence of progeny testing the inflation of genetic variance was more effective than subtracting parental breeding values at controlling inbreeding; however incorporating progeny testing made the latter strategy more potent and the superiority of inflating the genetic variance was in this case much smaller and non-significant.

Keywords

dairy cattleinbreedingMOET

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Science , Volume 60 , Issue 3 , June 1995 , pp. 379 - 387
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Boer, I. J. de and Arendonk, J. A. M. van. 1994. Additive response to selection adjusted for effects of inbreeding in a closed dairy cattle nucleus assuming a large number of gametes per female. Animal Production 58: 173–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bondoc, O. L. and Smith, C. 1993. Optimized testing schemes using nucleus progeny, adult MOET siblings, or juvenile MOET pedigrees in dairy cattle closed populations. Animal Breeding and Genetics 110: 30–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cabellero, A. and Santiago, E. 1994. Prediction of effective size of populations under selection and non-random mating. Proceeding of the fifth world congress on genetics applied to livestock production, vol. 19, pp. 143–146.Google Scholar
Colleau, J. J. 1985. [Genetic improvement by ET within selection nuclei in dairy cattle.] Genetics Selection Evolution 17: 499–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colleau, J. J. 1992. Combining the use of embryo sexing and cloning within mixed MOET for selection on dairy cattle. Genetics Selection Evolution 17: 345–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grundy, B. and Hill, W. G. 1993. A method for reducing inbreeding with best linear unbiased prediction. Animal Production 56: 427 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Hill, W. G. 1979. A note on effective population size of populations with overlapping generations. Genetics 92: 317–322.Google Scholar
Hill, W. G. and Meyer, K. 1988. Developments in methods for breeding value and parameter estimation in livestock, In Animal breeding opportunities occasional publication, British Society of Animal Production, no. 12, pp. 81–95.Google Scholar
Juga, J. and Maki-Tanila, A. 1987. Genetic change in a nucleus breeding dairy herd using embryo transfer. Ada Agriculturare Scandinavia 37: 511–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leitch, H. W., Smith, C, Burnside, E. B. and Quinton, M. 1995. Effects of female reproductive rate and mating design on genetic responses in closed nucleus schemes. Animal Science In press.Google Scholar
Lohuis, M. M., Smith, C. and Dekkers, J. C. M. 1993. MOET results from a dispersed hybrid nucleus programme in dairy cattle. Animal Production 57: 369–378.Google Scholar
Luo, Z. W., Woolliams, J. A. and Simm, G. 1994. Assessment of present and future effectiveness of embryological techniques. AgBiotech News and Information 6: 13N–18N.Google Scholar
Meuwissen, T. H. E. 1991. Expectation and variance of genetic gain in open and closed nucleus and progeny testing schemes. Animal Production 53: 133–141.Google Scholar
Meuwissen, T. H. E. and Woolliams, J. A. 1994. Maximizing genetic response in breeding schemes of dairy cattle with constraints on variance of response, journal of Dairy Science 77: 1905–1916.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nicholas, F. W. and Smith, C. 1983. Increased rates of genetic change in dairy cattle by embryo transfer and splitting. Animal Production 36: 341–353.Google Scholar
Quaas, R. L. and Pollak, E. J. 1980. Mixed model methodology for farm and ranch beef cattle testing program. Journal of Animal Science 51: 1277–1287.Google Scholar
Robertson, A. 1961. Inbreeding in artificial selection programmes. Genetical Research 2: 189–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruane, J. and Thompson, R. 1991. Comparison of simulated and theoretical results in adult MOET nucleus schemes for daily cattle. Livestock Production Science 28: 1–20.Google Scholar
Schrooten, C. and Arendonk, J. A. M. van. 1992. Stochastic simulation of dairy cattle breeding schemes: genetic evaluation of nucleus size and type, journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 109: 1–15.Google Scholar
Stranden, I., Maki-Tanila, A. and Mantysaari, E. A. 1991. Genetic progress and rate of inbreeding in a closed adult MOET nucleus under different mating strategies and heritabilities. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 108: 401–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toro, M. and Perez-Enciso, M. 1990. Optimization of selection response under restricted inbreeding. Genetics Selection Evolution 22: 93–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verrier, E., Colleau, J. J., Foulley, J. L. 1993. Long term effects of selection based on the animal model BLUP in a finite population. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 87: 446–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villanueva, B., Woolliams, J. A. and Simm, G. 1994. Strategies for controlling rates of inbreeding in adult MOET nucleus schemes for beef cattle. Genetics Selection Evolution In press.Google Scholar
Wiener, G., Lee, G. J. and Woolliams, J. A. 1992. Effects of rapid inbreeding and of crossing inbred lines on conception rate1, prolificacy and ewe survival in sheep1. Animal Production 55: 115–121.Google Scholar
Wiggans, G. R., Misztal, I. and Van Vleck, L. D. 1988. Implementation of an animal model for genetic evaluation of dairy cattle in United States, journal of Dairy Science 71: suppl. 2, pp. 54–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woolliams, J. A. 1989. Modifications to MOET nucleus breeding schemes to improve rates of genetic progress and decrease rates of inbreeding in dairy cattle. Animal Production 49: 1–14.Google Scholar
Woolliams, J. A., Luo, Z. W., Villanueva, B., Waddington, D., Broadbent, P. J., McKelvey, W. A. C. and Robinson, J. J. 1994. Analysis of factors affecting embryo yields and ovulation rates, journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge In press.Google Scholar
Woolliams, J. A. and Meuwissen, T. H. E. 1993. Decision rules and variance of response in breeding schemes. Animal Production 56: 179–186.Google Scholar
Woolliams, J. A. and Thompson, R. 1994. A theory of contributions. Proceeding of the fifth world congress on genetics applied to livestock production, vol. 19, pp. 127–134.Google Scholar
Woolliams, J. A., Wray, N. R. and Thompson, R. 1993. Prediction of long-term contributions and inbreeding in populations undergoing mass selection. Genetical Research 62: 231–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wray, N. R. and Thompson, R. 1990. Prediction of rates of inbreeding in selected populations. Genetical Research 55: 41–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed