Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-p5m67 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-04T07:01:57.826Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of climatic environment and relocating and mixing on health status and productivity of pigs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

M. J. C. Hessing  and
M. J. M. Tielen
M. J. C. Hessing
Affiliation:
Department for Animal Husbandry, Agricultural University Wageningen, PO Box 338, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands
M. J. M. Tielen
Affiliation:
Animal Health Service in the Southern Netherlands, Molenwijkseweg 48, 5282 SC Boxtel, The Netherlands
Get access

Abstract

Two similar style experiments were carried out in a climate-controlled pig house to determine the effects of adverse climatic conditions and relocating and mixing on the health status and productivity of pigs. In both experiments, 120 pigs were used. The climate-controlled pig house consisted of two fully separated but identical rooms (experimental and control) with five pens each (12 pigs per pen). Pigs exposed to draught and low environmental temperature had lower daily gain (experiment 1: 45 g/day; experiment 2: 25 g/day) and higher food conversion (food: gain ratio) than pigs housed under optimal climatic conditions (control). Moreover, clinical disease signs (i.e. diarrhoea, coughing, sneezing and haemorrhagic ear lesions) were more pronounced in the experimental than in the control group. In experiment 1, pigs were relocated and mixed at 10 weeks of age either within or between the experimental and control room. Data showed clear negative effects on daily gain and clinical disease signs especially among pigs that were relocated to suboptimal climatic conditions. In experiment 2, pigs were either relocated and mixed between both rooms or they remained in their own pens. Data on daily gain and clinical disease signs revealed that the health of the pigs was strongly affected by mixing. Therefore, the present work emphasizes the importance of climatic environment and social factors in intensive pig production.

Keywords

climatic factorsdisease prevelancegroup housingpigsproductivity

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 59 , Issue 1 , August 1994 , pp. 131 - 139
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Armstrong, W. D. and Cline, T. R. 1977. Effects of various nutrient levels and environmental temperatures on the incidence of colibacillary diarrhoea in pigs: intestinal fistulation and titration studies. journal of Animal Science 45: 1042–1050.Google Scholar
Balsbaugh, R. K., Curtis, S. E., Meyer, R. C. and Norton, H. W. 1986. Cold resistance and environmental temperature preference in diarrheic piglets. Journal of Animal Science 62: 315–326.Google Scholar
Baile, E. M., Dahlby, R. W., Wiggs, B. R., Parsons, G. H. and Pare, P. D. 1987. Effect of cold and warm dry air hyperventilation on canine airway blood flow. Journal of Applied Physiology 62: 526–532.Google Scholar
Beden, S. N. and Brain, P. F. 1985. The primary immune responses to sheep red blood cells in mice of differing social rank or from individual housing. IRCS Medicine Science 13: 364–365.Google Scholar
Close, W. H. 1981. The climatic requirements of the pig. In Environmental aspects of housing for animal production (ed. Clark, J. A.), pp. 149–166. Butterworth, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebbesen, P., Villadsen, J. A., Villadsen, H. D. and Heller, K. E. 1991. Effect of subordinance, lack of social hierarchy and restricted feeding on murine survival and virus leukemia. Experimental Gerontology 26: 479–486.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elbers, A. R. W., Tielen, M. J. M., Cromwijk, W. A. J. and Hunneman, W. A. 1990. Sero-epidemiological screening of pig sera collected at the slaughterhouse to detect herds infected with Aujeszky's disease virus, porcine influenza virus and Actinobacillus (haemophilus) pleuropneumiae (App) in the framework of an integrated quality control (IQC) system. Veterinary Quarterly 12: 221–230.Google Scholar
Ely, D. L. and Henry, J. P. 1978. Neuroendocrine response patterns in dominant and sub-ordinate mice. Hormones and Behaviour 10: 156–169.Google Scholar
Fleshner, M., Laudenslager, M. L., Simons, L. and Maier, S. F. 1989. Reduced serum antibodies associated with social defeat in rats. Physiology and Behavior 45: 1183–1187.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gross, W. B. 1984. Effect of range of social stress severity on Escherichia coli challenge infection. American journal of Veterinary Science 45: 2074–2076.Google Scholar
Gust, D. A., Gordon, T. P., Wilson, M. E., Ahmed-Ansari, A., Brodie, A. R. and McClure, H. M. 1991. Formation of a new social group of unfamiliar female Rhesus monkeys affects the immune and pituitary adrenocortical systems. Brain, Behavior and Immunity 5: 296–307.Google Scholar
Hansen, S., Keverne, E. B., Martensz, N. D. and Herbert, J. 1980. Behavioural and neuroendocrine factors regulating prolactin and LH discharges in monkeys. Non-human primate models for study of human reproduction. Satellite symposium, seventh international congress of the Primatology Society, Bangalore, pp. 148–158.Google Scholar
Hessing, M. J. C., Scheepens, C. J. M., Schouten, W. G. P., Tielen, M. J. M. and Wiepkema, P. R. 1994. Social rank and disease susceptibility in pigs. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology In press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunneman, W. A. 1983. Incidence, economic effects and control of Haemophilus pleuropneumonia infections in pigs. Ph.D. thesis, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Utrecht, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Kelley, K. W. 1985. lmmunological consequences of changing environmental stimuli. In Animal stress (ed. Moberg, G. P.), pp. 193–223. American Physiological Society, Bethesda, Maryland.Google Scholar
Koolhaas, J. M. and Bohus, B. 1989. Social control in relation to neuroendocrine and immunological responses. In Stress, personal control and health (ed. Stephoe, A. and Appels, A.), pp. 295–305. ECSC-EEC-EAEC, Brussels- Luxembourg.Google Scholar
McConnell, J. C., Eargle, J. C. and Waldorf, R. C. 1987. Effects of weaning weight, co-mingling, group size and room temperature on pig performance. journal of Animal Science 65: 1201–1206.Google Scholar
Meese, G. B. and Ewbank, R. 1973. The establishment and nature of the dominance hierachy in the domesticated pig. Animal Behaviour 21: 326–334.Google Scholar
Morrison, S. R. and Mount, L. E. 1971. Adaptation of growing pigs to changes in environmental temperature. Animal Production 13: 51–57.Google Scholar
Mount, L. E., Start, I. B. and Brown, D. 1980. A note on the effects of forced air movement and environmental temperature on weight gain in the pig after weaning. Animal Production 30: 295–298.Google Scholar
Norusis, M. J. 1989. SPSS user's guide: SPSS/PC+ advanced statistics V3.1. Chicago.Google Scholar
Sallvik, K. and Walberg, K. 1984. The effects of air velocity and temperature on the behaviour and growth of pigs. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 30: 305–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheepens, C. J. M., Hessing, M. J. C., Laarakker, E., Schouten, W. G. P. and Tielen, M. J. M. 1991a. Influences of intermittent daily draught on the behaviour of weaned pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 31: 69–82.Google Scholar
Scheepens, C. J. M., Tielen, M. J. M. and Hessing, M. J. C., 1991b. Influence of daily intermittent draught on the health status of weaned pigs. Livestock Production Science 29: 241–254.Google Scholar
Scheepens, C. J. M., Tielen, M. J. M. and Wiepkema, P. R. 1990. New possibilities of improving health and welfare of pigs by introduction of the Specific Stress Free (SSF) system. Tijdschrijft voor Diergeneeskunde 115: 837–846.Google ScholarPubMed
Shimizu, M., Shimizu, Y. and Kodama, Y. 1978. Effect of ambient temperatures on induction of transmissible gastroenteritis in feeder pigs. Infection and Immunity 21: 747–752.Google Scholar
Siegel, S. and Castellan, N. J. 1988. Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. pp. 224–272. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
Tielen, M. J. M. 1974. Incidence and the prevention by animal care of lung and liver affections of fattening pigs. Ph.D. thesis, Agricultural University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Tielen, M. J. M. 1986. The influence of temperature and air velocity on the occurrence of respiratory diseases in pigs. Proceedings of the thirty seventh annual meeting of the European Association of Animal Production, Budapest, Hungary, pp. 6–11.Google Scholar
Tielen, M. J. M. 1987. Respiratory diseases in pigs: incidence, economic losses and prevention in the Netherlands. In Energy metabolism in farm animals. Effects of housing, stress and disease (ed. Verstegen, M. W. A. and Henken, A. M.), pp. 321–336. Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Tielen, M. J. M. and Scheepens, C. J. M. 1992. Less stress: the SSF approach. Pig International, pp. 24–26.Google Scholar
Verhagen, J. M. F. 1987. Acclimation of growing pigs to climatic environment. Ph.D. thesis, Agricultural University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Verhagen, J. M. F., Kloosterman, A. A. M., Slijkhuis, A. and Verstegen, M. W. A. 1987. Effect of ambient temperature on energy metabolism in growing pigs. Animal Production 44: 427–433.Google Scholar
Von Hoist, D. 1986. Vegetative and somatic components of tree shrews behavior. Journal of the Autonomic Nervous System: suppl., pp. 657–670.Google Scholar
Wilson, M. R. 1986. Enteric colibacillosis. In Diseases of swine (ed. Leman, A. D.), pp. 520–528. Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar