Hostname: page-component-76c49bb84f-ckhzl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-11T22:37:20.083Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of driver behaviour, driving events and road type on the stability and resting behaviour of sheep in transit

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2016

M. S. Cockram ,
E. M. Baxter ,
L. A. Smith ,
S. Bell ,
C. M. Howard ,
R. J. Prescott  and
M. A. Mitchell
M. S. Cockram
Affiliation:
Animal Welfare Research Group, Division of Veterinary Clinical Studies, Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Veterinary Centre, Easter Bush, Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9RG, UK
E. M. Baxter
Affiliation:
Animal Welfare Research Group, Division of Veterinary Clinical Studies, Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Veterinary Centre, Easter Bush, Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9RG, UK
L. A. Smith
Affiliation:
Animal Welfare Research Group, Division of Veterinary Clinical Studies, Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Veterinary Centre, Easter Bush, Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9RG, UK
S. Bell
Affiliation:
Animal Welfare Research Group, Division of Veterinary Clinical Studies, Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Veterinary Centre, Easter Bush, Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9RG, UK
C. M. Howard
Affiliation:
Animal Welfare Research Group, Division of Veterinary Clinical Studies, Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Veterinary Centre, Easter Bush, Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9RG, UK
R. J. Prescott
Affiliation:
Medical Statistics Unit, Public Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh Medical School, Teviot Place, Edinburgh EH8 9AG, UK
M. A. Mitchell
Affiliation:
Roslin Institute, Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9PS, UK
Get access

Abstract

Abstract

The aim of this project was to examine the relationships between driver behaviour and driving events during a journey and the behavioural responses of sheep to these events. Driving style can have a major influence on the welfare of the animals by affecting the risk of injury and by disturbing the ability of the sheep to rest. Two drivers each drove groups of 10 sheep in a 5·5-tonne, single-deck, non-articulated livestock vehicle on five 7-h road journeys consisting of minor roads, main single carriageways and a motorway. The driver, the driver’s view through the windscreen, the speedometer and the sheep were video recorded. Differences in driving style were identified as differences in vehicle speed, rapid braking and the number of corners taken with high cornering g-force. Differences in driving style had a slight effect on the frequency of losses of balance by the sheep and a more significant effect on the degree of disturbance to the sheep and on their ability to rest during the journey. Losses of balance were common, but falls were rare. About 80% of the losses of balance could have been caused by driving events, such as acceleration, braking, stopping, cornering, gear changes and uneven road surfaces. Only about 22% of driving events were followed by a loss of balance. It is likely that driving events were also responsible for many interruptions to both lying behaviour and rumination. Clear benefits of motorway driving compared with single carriageway driving were fewer losses of balance, more lying down, more rumination and fewer disturbances amongst the sheep. This study provides evidence that would be useful for driver training and education to promote careful driving as a means of ensuring the welfare of animals in-transit. The quality of the journey experienced by sheep during transport is dependent upon a number of factors that can be influenced by the driver of the vehicle.

Keywords

animal welfarebehavioursheeptransport

Information

Type
Ruminant nutrition, behaviour and production
Information
Animal Science , Volume 79 , Issue 1 , August 2004 , pp. 165 - 176
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Bradshaw, R. H., Hall, S. J. G. and Broom, D. M. 1996. Behavioural and cortisol response of pigs and sheep during transport. Veterinary Record 138: 233–234.Google Scholar
Christie, R. 2001. The effectiveness of driver training as a road safety measure: an international review of the literature. Proceedings of the road safety research, policing and education conference, Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
Cockram, M. S., Kent, J. E., Goddard, P. J., Waran, N. K., McGilp, I. M., Jackson, R. E., Muwanga, G. M. and Prytherch, S. 1996. Effect of space allowance during transport on the behavioural and physiological responses of lambs during and after transport. Animal Science 62: 461–477.Google Scholar
Cockram, M. S., Kent, J. E., Jackson, R. E., Goddard, P. J., Doherty, O. M., McGilp, I. M., Fox, A., Studdert-Kennedy, T. C., McConnell, T. I. and O’Riordan, T. 1997. Effect of lairage during 24 h of transport on the behavioural and physiological responses of sheep. Animal Science 65: 391–402.Google Scholar
Cockram, M. S. and Mitchell, M. A. 1999. Rôle of research in the formulation of ‘rules’ to protect the welfare of farm animals during road transportation. In Farm animal welfare-who writes the rules ? (ed. Russel, A. J. F. Morgan, C. A. Savory, C. J. C., M. Appleby and T. Lawrence, L. J.), British Society of Animal Science occasional publication no. 23, pp. 43–64.Google Scholar
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. 2002. Assessment of practical experience in the handling, transport and care of animals. Guidance to employers. PB3575. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, London.Google Scholar
Department for Transport. 2002. Road accidents, Great Britain: 2001. Department for Transport, London.Google Scholar
Elander, J., West, R. and French, D. 1993. Behavioral correlates of individual differences in road-traffic crash risk: an examination of methods and findings. Psychological Bulletin 113: 279–294.Google Scholar
European Council. 1991. Council Directive 91/628/EEC 19 November 1991 on the protection of animals during transport and amending Directives 90/425/EEC and 91/ 496/EEC. Official Journal of the European Communities L340: 17–38.Google Scholar
Gibbs, A. E. and Friend, T. H. 1999. Horse preference for orientation during transport and the effect of orientation on balancing ability. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 63: 1–9.Google Scholar
Great Britain Parliament. 1997. The Welfare of Animals (Transport) Order, 1997. Statutory instrument 1997/1480. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Grigor, P. N., Goddard, P. J., Littlewood, C. A. and MacDonald, A. J. 1998. The behavioural and physiological reactions of farmed red deer to transport: effects of road type and journey time. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 56: 263–279.Google Scholar
Haglund, M. and Åberg, L. 2002. Stability in drivers’ speed choice. Transportation Research, Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 5: 177–188.Google Scholar
Hall, S. J. G., Kirkpatrick, S. M., Lloyd, D. M. and Broom, D. M. 1998. Noise and vehicular motion as potential stressors during the transport of sheep. Animal Science 67: 467–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatakka, M., Keskinen, E., Gregersen, N. P., Glad, A. and Hernetkoski, K. 2002. From control of the vehicle to personal self-control; broadening the perspectives to driver education. Transportation Research, Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 5: 201–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jago, J. G., Harcourt, R. G. and Matthews, L. R. 1997. The effect of road-type and distance transported on behaviour, physiology and carcass quality of farmed red deer (Cervus elaphus). Applied Animal Behaviour Science 51: 129–141.Google Scholar
Jarvis, A. M. and Cockram, M. S. 1994. Effect of handling and transport on bruising of sheep sent directly from farms to slaughter. Veterinary Record 135: 523–527.Google Scholar
Kenny, F. J. and Tarrant, P. V. 1987a. The physiological and behavioural responses of crossbred Friesian steers to short-haul transport by road. Livestock Production Science 17: 63–75.Google Scholar
Kenny, F. J. and Tarrant, P. V. 1987b. The reaction of young bulls to short-haul road transport. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 17: 209–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knowles, T. G. 1998. A review of the road transport of slaughter sheep. Veterinary Record 143: 212–219.Google Scholar
Lajunen, T., Karola, J. and Summala, H. 1997. Speed and acceleration as measures of driving style in young male drivers. Perceptual and Motor Skills 85: 3–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food; Scottish Office, Agriculture, Environment and Fisheries Department; and Welsh Office Agriculture Department. 1998. Guidance on the welfare of animals (transport) order 1997. PB3766. MAFF, London.Google Scholar
Parker, D., West, R., Stradling, S. and Manstead, A. S. R. 1995. Behavioural characteristics and involvement in different types of traffic accident. Accident Analysis and Prevention 27: 571–581.Google Scholar
Randall, J. M. 1992. Human subjective response to lorry vibration-implications for farm animal transport. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 52: 295–307.Google Scholar
Randall, J. M. and Bradshaw, R. H. 1998. Vehicle motion and motion sickness in pigs. Animal Science 66: 239–245.Google Scholar
Ruiz-de-la-Torre, J. L., Velarde, A., Diestre, A., Gispert, M., Hall, S. J. G., Broom, D. M. and Manteca, X. 2001. Effects of vehicle movements during transport on the stress responses and meat quality of sheep. Veterinary Record 148: 227–229.Google Scholar
Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 2000. SAS system for windows, release 8. 01. SAS Institute, Cary NC.Google Scholar
Sullman, M. J. M., Meadows, M. L. and Pajo, K. B. 2002. Aberrant driving behaviours amongst New Zealand truck drivers. Transportation Research, Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 5: 217–232.Google Scholar
Tarrant, P. V., Kenny, F. J. and Harrington, D. 1988. The effect of stocking density during 4 hour transport to slaughter on behaviour, blood constituents and carcass bruising in Friesian steers. Meat Science 24: 209–222.Google Scholar
Treffner, P., Barrett, R. and Petersen, A. 2002. Stability and skill in driving. Human Movement Science 21: 749–784.Google Scholar
West, R., French, D., Kemp, R. and Elander, J. 1993. Direct observation of driving, self-reports of driver behavior, and accident involvement. Ergonomics 36: 557–567.Google Scholar
Wouters, P. I. J. and Bos, J. M. J. 2000. Traffic accident reduction by monitoring driver behaviour with in-car data recorders. Accident Analysis and Prevention 32: 643–650.Google Scholar