Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-9knnw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-04T16:58:09.902Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of forage type on the digestion of whole barley grain by breeding ewes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

D. M. Chestnutt
D. M. Chestnutt
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, Hillsborough, Co Down BT26 6DR
Get access

Abstract

The proportion of whole grain consumed that was voided intact in the faeces of ewes in late pregnancy and early lactation was measured for diets based on a range of forages in two experiments. The proportions of grain voided intact varied widely between ewes and was to some extent a characteristic of the individual ewe. During late pregnancy on hay-based diets the mean proportion of grain recovered was 0·053 with a range from 0·042 to 0·063 while on silage-based diets 0·135 (range 0·082 to 0·209) was recovered. On silage-based diets after lambing 0·196 and 0·235 of grain was voided intact in the faeces. The proportion of intact grain voided was affected by forage intake. The estimated increase in the proportion of grain voided intact was 0·012 measured over a range of forages before lambing and 0·021 on silage after lambing per 100 g increase in dry matter intake. However, when the total digestibility was measured, there were no differences between feeding of whole and processed grain where proportionately 0·06 of whole grain consumed was voided intact.

Keywords

cereal grainsdigestibilityewesforage

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 51 , Issue 3 , December 1990 , pp. 583 - 591
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Apolant, S. M. and Chestnutt, D. M. B. 1985. The effect of mechanical treatment of silage on intake and production of sheep. Animal Production 40: 287–296.Google Scholar
Chestnutt, D. M. B. and Kilpatrick, D. J. 1989. The effect of silage type and concentrate supplementation on the intake and performance of breeding ewes. Annual Report, 1988–89, Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, pp. 21–30.Google Scholar
Morgan, C. A. and Campling, R. C. 1978. Chewing behaviour of hay-fed cows given supplements of whole barley and oat grains. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 91: 415–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mould, L. F., Ørskov, E. R. and Gauld, S. A. 1983. Associative effects of mixed feeds. II. The effect of dietary addition of bicarbonate salts on the voluntary intake and digestibility of diets containing various proportions of hay and barley. Animal Feed Science and Technology 10: 31–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ørskov, E. R. 1981. Recent advances in the understanding of cereal processing for ruminants. In Recent Developments in Animal Nutrition (ed. Haresign, W. and Cole, D. J. A.), pp. 258–267. Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
Ørskov, E. R., Fraser, C. and Gordon, J. C. 1974. Effect of processing of cereals on the rumen fermentation, digestibility, rumination time and firmness of subcutaneous fat in lambs. British Journal of Nutrition 32: 59–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Toland, P. C. 1978. Influence of some digestive processes on the digestion by cattle of cereal grains fed whole. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 18: 29–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vipond, J. E., Hunter, E. A. and King, M. E. 1985. The utilization of whole and rolled cereals by ewes. Animal Production 40: 297–301.Google Scholar
Weston, R. H. 1959. The efficiency of wool production of grazing Merino sheep. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 10: 865–885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar