Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T17:35:40.080Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of phytase supplementation with two levels of phosphorus diets on ileal and faecal digestibilities of nutrients and phosphorus, calcium, nitrogen and energy balances in growing pigs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

M. Z. Fan
Affiliation:
On leave at Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences, PO Box 10, Changsha, Hunan 410125, People's Republic of China
T. J. Li
Affiliation:
On leave at Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences, PO Box 10, Changsha, Hunan 410125, People's Republic of China
Y. L. Yin*
Affiliation:
On leave at Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences, PO Box 10, Changsha, Hunan 410125, People's Republic of China
R. J. Fang
Affiliation:
On leave at Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences, PO Box 10, Changsha, Hunan 410125, People's Republic of China
Z. Y. Tang
Affiliation:
On leave at Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences, PO Box 10, Changsha, Hunan 410125, People's Republic of China
Z. P. Hou
Affiliation:
On leave at Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences, PO Box 10, Changsha, Hunan 410125, People's Republic of China
R. L. Huang
Affiliation:
On leave at Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences, PO Box 10, Changsha, Hunan 410125, People's Republic of China
Z. Y. Deng
Affiliation:
On leave at Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences, PO Box 10, Changsha, Hunan 410125, People's Republic of China
H. Y. Zhong
Affiliation:
On leave at Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences, PO Box 10, Changsha, Hunan 410125, People's Republic of China
R. G. Zhang
Affiliation:
On leave at Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences, PO Box 10, Changsha, Hunan 410125, People's Republic of China
J. Zhang
Affiliation:
On leave at Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences, PO Box 10, Changsha, Hunan 410125, People's Republic of China
B. Wang
Affiliation:
On leave at Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences, PO Box 10, Changsha, Hunan 410125, People's Republic of China
H. Schulze
Affiliation:
DSM Food Specialties BV of The Netherlands
Get access

Abstract

The experiment was conducted to assess the effects of phytase supplementation to diets with two levels of phosphorus (P) on ileal and faecal digestibility of nutrients and phosphorus, calcium, nitrogen and energy balances in growing pigs. Fifteen Landrace × Large White × Chinese Black barrows, with an initial live weight of 22·2 kg fitted with a simple T-cannula at the distal ileum, were randomly allocated to one of the five diet treatments, according to a of cross-over design with two periods. The basal diet was typical of southern Asia with maize/rice and rapeseed/cottonseed meals. A normal (NP, supplemented with 4·8 g/kg of CaHPO4) and a low-P diet (LP, not supplemented with CaHPO4) were formulated. Both of the diets were supplemented with and without Natuphos® Phytase (500 phytase units (FTU) per kg diet). An enzyme hydrolysed casein (EHC) diet (diet 5) was also formulated to determine the flow of the ileal endogenous amino acids (AA). The results showed that both the higher level P treatment and phytase supplementation increased (P < 0·05) the apparent ileal digestibility (AID) of dry matter (DM), organic matter (OM), crude protein (CP) and energy. Phytase supplementation also increased (P < 0·05) the AID of Ca and P. Pigs given the higher level of P or the phytase diet increased apparent faecal digestibility (AFD) of DM, OM and energy. Phytase supplementation reduced (P < 0·01) faecal Ca output and increased (P < 0·05) proportional Ca retention. The higher level of P increased (P < 0·001) total P intake and P retention (P < 0·05) but did not affect the proportion of P retained (P > 0·05). Phytase supplementation did not affect P balance (P > 0·05). Pigs given the higher level P or the phytase diet had reduced (P < 0·05) faecal energy concentration, although there was no affect on urine energy output, digestible energy (DE) and metabolizable energy (ME). However, there were P × phytase effects on DE and ME (P < 0·05). There were no P × phytase effects (P > 0·05) on AID of AA except with isoleucine (P < 0·01). Phytase supplementation increased (P < 0·05) AID of histidine, isoleucine, threonine and glutamine and there was a numeric increase in AID for most of the other AA. There was P × phytase effect on AFD of histidine (P < 0·05), isoleucine (P < 0·05), methionine (P < 0·05) and threonine (P < 0·01). Phytase supplementation increased the AFD of isoleucine (P < 0·05), threonine (P < 0·01) and tended to increase AFD of tyrosine (P < 0·05). The level of MCP affected the AFD of lysine (P < 0·01), threonine (P < 0·05), aspartic acid (P < 0·05). Phytase supplementation increased true ileal digestibility of histidine (P < 0·05), isoleucine (P < 0·001), threonine (P = 0·001), glutamine (P < 0·01), respectively. These results indicate that phytase used in the present study was able to improve the utilization of DM, OM, CP, Ca, P, energy and amino acid in a maize/rice and rapeseed/cottonseed meal based diet and reduce total output of them in manure.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†Department of Animal and Poultry Science, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario N1 G 2W15, Canada.
‡Also member of staff: Department of Food Science Engineering, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330047, People's Republic of China.

References

Adeola, O., Lawrence, B. V., Sutton, A. L. and Cline, T. R. 1995. Phytase-induced changes in mineral utilization in zinc-supplemented diets for pigs. Journal of Animal Science 73: 33843391.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 1990. Official methods of analysis (16th edition). Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Cosgrove, D. J. 1980. Inositol phosphates. Their chemistry, biochemistry and physiology. Elsevier Scientific, New York.Google Scholar
Cromwell, G. L. and Coffey, R. D. 1991. Phosphorus-a key essential nutrient, yet a possible major pollutant-its central role in animal nutrition. In Biotechnology in the feed industry (ed. Lyons, T. P.), pp. 133145. Alltech Technical Publications, Nicholasville, KY.Google Scholar
Cromwell, G. L., Stahly, T. S., Coffey, R. D., Monegue, H. J. and Randolph, J. H. 1993. Efficacy of microbial phytase in improving the availability of phosphorus in soybean meal and corn-soyabean meal diets for pigs. Journal of Animal Science 71: 1831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenton, T. W. and Fenton, M. 1979. An improved procedure for the determination of chromic oxide in feed and feces. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 59: 631634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harper, A. F., Kornegay, E. T. and Schell, T. C. 1997. Phytase supplementation of low-phosphorus growing-finishing pig diets improves performance, phosphorus digestibility, and bone mineralization and reduces phosphorus excretion. Journal of Animal Science 75: 31743186.Google Scholar
Ketaren, P. P., Batterham, E. S., Dettmann, E. B. and Farrell, D. J. 1993. Phosphorus studies in pigs. 3. Effect of phytase supplementation on the digestibility and availability of phosphorus in soy-bean meal for grower pigs. British Journal of Nutrition 70: 289297.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kies, A., Hemert, K. van, Selle, P. and Kemme, P. 1997. The protein effect of phytase. In Enzymes and organic acids in the Dutch feed industry. BASF symposium, Arnhem, The Netherlands, 03 1997.Google Scholar
Klis, J. D. van der and Versteegh, H. A. J. 1991. Ileal absorption of P in lightweight white laying hens using microbial phytase and various calcium content in laying hen feed. Spelderholt pub. no. 563. Het Spelderholt, Wageningen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Latta, M. and Eskin, M. 1980. A simple and rapid colorimetric method for phytate determination. Journal of Agricultural Food and Chemistry 28: 13131315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ledoux, D. R., Firman, J. D., Broomhead, J. N. and Li, Y. C. 1999. Effects of microbial phytase on apparent ileal digestibily of amino acids in turkey poults fed a corn-soybean meal diet formulated on an ideal protein basis. Journal of Poultry Science 78: (suppl. 1) 7475 (abstr. ).Google Scholar
Llames, C. R. and Fontaine, J. 1994. Determination of amino acids in feeds: Collaborative study. Journal of the Association Official Analysis Chemistry 77: 13621366.Google Scholar
Moughan, P. J. and Rutherfurd, S. M. 1990. Endogenous flow of total lysine and other amino acids at the distal ileum of the protein- or peptide-fed rat: the chemical labeling of gelatin protein by transformation of lysine to homoarginine, Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 52: 179192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mroz, Z., Jongbloed, A. W. and Kemme, P. A. 1994. Apparent digestibility and retention of nutrients bound to phytate complexes as influenced by microbial phytase and feeding regimen in pigs. Journal of Animal Science 72: 126132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nasi, M. 1990. Microbial phytase supplementation for improving availability of plant phosphorus in the diet of the growing pigs. Journal of Agricultural Science in Finland 62: 435447.Google Scholar
National Research Council. 1988. Nutrient requirements of swine (ninth edition). National Academy Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
National Research Council. 1998. Nutrient requirements of swine (10th edition). National Academy Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Nelson, T. S., Ferrara, L. W. and Storer, N. L. 1968. Phytate phosphorus content of feed ingredients derived from plants. Journal of Poultry Science 47: 3372.Google Scholar
Oberleas, D. 1973. Toxicants occurring naturally in food. National Academy of Science, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
O'Quinn, P. R., Knabe, D. A. and Gregg, E. J. 1997. Efficacy of Natuphos® in sorghum-based diets of finishing swine. Journal of Animal Science 75: 12991307.Google Scholar
Pallaut, J. G., Rimbach, S., Pippig, B. and Most, E. 1994. Effect of phytase supplementation to a phytate-rich diet based on wheat, barley and soya on the bioavailability of dietary phosphorus, calcium, magnesium, zinc and protein in piglets. Agribiology Reservation 47: 3951.Google Scholar
Ravindran, V., Bryden, W. L., Cabahug, S. and Selle, P. H. 1998. Impact of microbial phytase on the digestibility of protein amino acids, and energy in broiler. Proceedings of the Maryland nutrition conference for feed manufacturers, Baltimore, MD, pp. 156165.Google Scholar
Ravindran, V., Bryden, W. L. and Korengay, E. T. 1995. Phytates: occurrence, bioavailability and implications in poultry nutrition. Poultry Avian Biology Reservation 6: 125143.Google Scholar
Ravindran, V., Selle, P. H., Ravaindran, G., Morel, P. C. H., Kies, A. K. and Bryden, W. L. 2001. Microbial phytase improves performance, apparent metabolizable energy, and ileal amino acid digestibility of broiler fed a lysine-deficient diet. Journal of Poultry Science 80: 338344.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reddy, N. R., Sathe, S. K. and Salunkhe, D. K. 1982. Phytates in legumes and cereals. In Advances in food research (ed. Chichester, C.O., Mrak, E. M. and Stewart, G. F.), pp. 192. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Shim, Y. H., Chae, B. J. and Lee, J. H. 2003. Effects of phytase and carbohydrases supplementation to diet with a partial replacement of soybean meal with rapeseed meal and cottonseed meal on growth performance and nutrient digestibility of growing pigs. Asian-Australian Journal of Animal Science 16: 13391347.Google Scholar
Simons, P. C. M., Versteegh, H. A. J., Jongbloed, A. W., Kemme, P. A., Slump, P., Bos, K. D., Wolters, M. G. E., Beudeker, R. F. and Verschoor, G. J. 1990. Improvement of phosphorus availability by microbial phytase in broilers and pigs. British Journal of Nutrition 64: 525540.Google Scholar
Snow, J. L., Douglas, M. W. and Parsons, C. M. 2003. Phytase effect on amino acid digestibility in moulted laying hens. Journal of Poultry Science 82: 474477.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 1990. SAS/STAT user's guide: statistics, release 6·04 edition. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.Google Scholar
Yang, S. 1979. Animal feeding experiment and animal feed analyses. Agricultural Press, Beijing.Google Scholar
Yi, Z., Kornegay, E. T. and Denbow, D. M. 1996. Effect of microbial phytase on nitrogen amino acid digestibility and nitrogen retention of turkey poults fed corn-soybean meal diets. Journal of Poultry Science 75: 979990.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yin, Y. -L., Huang, R. -L., Zhong, H. -Y., Chen, C. -M. and Dai, H. 1991. Influence of different cannulation techniques on the pre-cecal digestibility of protein, amino acids and cell wall constituents from diets, containing different protein meal, in pigs. Journal of Animal Feed Science and Technology 35: 271281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yin, Y. L., McEvoy, J. D. G., Schulze, H. and McCracken, K. J. 2000. Studies on cannulation and alternative indigestible markers and the effect of food enzyme supplementation in barley-based diets in ileal and overall digestibility in pigs. Journal of Animal Science 70: 6372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, L. G., Leunissen, M. and Atkinson, J. L. 1993. Addition of microbial phytase to diets of young pigs. Journal of Animal Science 71: 21472150.Google Scholar