Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T06:29:40.124Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effect of protein content of the supplement for dairy cows with access ad libitum to high digestibility, wilted grass silage

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

F. J. Gordon
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, Hillsborough, Co. Down
Get access

Abstract

Grass silage with a dry-matter (DM) content of 253 g/kg and containing 142 g crude protein and 670 g digestible organic matter/kg DM was offered ad libitum to 56 first- and second-lactation British Friesian cows during the first 75 days post-calving. In addition the animals received supplementary concentrates containing either 95 (T1), 137 (T2), 174 (T3) or 209 (T4) g crude protein per kg fresh weight, with extracted soya bean meal being used as the protein source. All concentrates were offered at equal levels across treatments, the amounts being 8 kg for first- and 10 kg per day for second-lactation animals. The silage DM intakes recorded over the period were 514, 524, 548 and 545 ± 19·9 kg and milk outputs were 1349, 1451, 1533 and 1628 ±40·2 kg for treatments Tl to T4 respectively. The rate of live-weight change and the milk fat, solids-not-fat, protein, lactose and ash contents of the milk were not affected significantly by any of the treatments. Diet digestibilities were determined using three animals per treatment. The digestibility coefficients were for DM 0·738, 0·746, 0·776 and 0·772 ± 0·0088 and nitrogen 0·597, 0·641, 0·707 and 0·727 ±0·0126 for treatments T1 to T4 respectively.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Broster, W. H. 1972. Protein requirements of cows for lactation. In Handbuch der Tierernährung (ed. Lenkeit, W., Breirem, K. and Crasemann, E.) Vol. 2, pp. 292322. Parey, Hamburg.Google Scholar
Broster, W. H., Balch, C. C., Bartlett, S. and Campling, R. C. 1960. The value of ammoniated sugar beet pulp for dairy cows. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 55: 197202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broster, W. H., Broster, V. J., Smith, T. and Siviter, J. W. 1975. Experiments on the nutrition of the dairy heifer. IX. Food utilization in lactation. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 84: 173186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, T. M. 1973. Sources and levels of proteins in cattle feeds. Ir. Grassld, Anim. Prod. Assoc. J. 8: 2431.Google Scholar
Butler, T. M. and Gleeson, P. A. 1973. Energy and protein supplementation of grass silage for lactating cows. An Foras Talúntais, Anim. Prod. Res. Rep. pp. 9899.Google Scholar
Castle, M. E. and Watson, J. N. 1976. Silage and milk production. A comparison between barley and groundnut cake as supplements to silage of high digestibility. J. Br. Grassld Soc. 31: 191195.Google Scholar
Cuthbert, N. H., Thickett, W. S. and Wilson, P. N. 1973. The effect of varying protein level in a compound diet fed in conjunction with grass silage. Proc. Br. Soc. Anim. Prod. (New Series) 2: 70 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Gordon, F. J. 1977a. Comparison of results from long term dairy cattle feeding experiments with calculated N-requirements. In Proc. 2nd int. Symp. Protein Metabolism and Nutrition, pp. 142146.Google Scholar
Gordon, F. J. 1977b. The effect of protein content on the response of lactating cows to level of concentrate feeding. Anim. Prod. 25: 181191.Google Scholar
Gordon, F. J. and Forbes, T. J. 1970. The associative effect of level of energy and protein intake in the dairy cow. J. Dairy Res. 37: 481491.Google Scholar
Ling, E. R. 1956. A Text Book of Dairy Chemistry. Vol. 2, 3rd ed. Chapman and Hall, London.Google Scholar
Ørskov, E. R., Grubb, D. A. and Kay, R. N. B. 1977. Effect of postruminal glucose or protein supplementation on milk yield and composition in Friesian cows in early lactation and negative energy balance. Br. J. Nutr. 38: 397405.Google Scholar
Payne, J. M., Rowlands, G. J., Manston, R., Dew, S. M. and Parker, W. H. 1974. A statistical appraisal of the results of the metabolic profile tests on 191 herds in the B.V.A./A.D.A.S. joint exercise in animal health and productivity. Br. vet. J. 130: 3444.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, R. K. and McCarrick, R. B. 1966. Apparent dry matter digestibility, voluntary food-intake and yields of dry matter of mixed swards, conserved as artificially dried grass and tetrapod hay at progressive stages of maturity. In Proc. of 10th int. Grassland Congress, Helsinki, pp. 371379.Google Scholar
Wybenga, D. R., Di Giorgio, J. and Pileggi, V. J. 1971. Manual and automated methods for urea nitrogen measurement in whole serum. Clin. Chem. 17: 891895.Google Scholar