Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-dk7s8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T12:34:44.965Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effects of level of feeding of sows during pregnancy. I. Reproductive performance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

G. A. Lodge ,
F. W. H. Elsley  and
R. M. MacPherson
G. A. Lodge
Affiliation:
The Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen
F. W. H. Elsley
Affiliation:
The Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen
R. M. MacPherson
Affiliation:
The Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen
Get access

Extract

1. Twelve sets of 3 litter-sister Large White gilts were mated at first oestrus after reaching 250 lb. live-weight and given daily during 3 successive pregnancies either 6 lb. (A), 3 lb. (B) or 3 lb. for 76 days then 6 lb. until parturition (C) of the same meal mixture. During an 8-week lactation all were given 4 lb. meal plus 0·8 lb. per piglet suckled.

2. There was a significant linear increase in numbers born with successive parities (P<0·05) but no significant differences between treatment or sister groups. There was a highly significant difference between treatment groups in mean piglet birth weight (P< 0·001) but no parity effect; mean birth weights were 2·76, 2·40 and 2·58 Ib. for Groups A, B and C respectively. Differences between sister groups in mean piglet birth weight were also significant (P<0·05).

3. Post-natal litter performance was poor for all groups, probably because of the presence of E. coli, but there was no evidence of treatment effects other than on 3-week weight of third litters, which was significantly greater in Group C than in A or B (P<0·05). There were no significant effects on either number or weight of piglets at 8 weeks.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 8 , Issue 1 , February 1966 , pp. 29 - 38
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Ballinger, C. E., 1940. Feeding sows immediately after weaning and six weeks before farrowing means more pigs per litter. N.Z. J. Agric., 60: 60–351.Google Scholar
Ballinger, C. E., 1944. Nutrition of breeding sows. N.Z. J. Agric., 69: 69–101.Google Scholar
Boaz, T. G., 1962. The significance of level of protein in the nutrition of the pregnant sow. Vet. Rec., 74: 74–1482.Google Scholar
Bowland, J. P., 1964. Influence of source and level of energy and level of protein intake on sow performance during growth, gestation and lactation. I. Gain, energy requirements and reproductive performance. Canad. J. Anim. Sci., 44: 44–142.Google Scholar
Clawson, A. J., Richards, H. L., Matrone, G., & Barrick, E. R., 1963. The influence of level of total nutrient and protein intake on reproductive performance in swine. J. Anim. Sci., 22: 22–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dean, B. T., & Tribble, L. F., 1960. Value of feeding high levels of antibiotics to sows at breeding. 4th Annual Swine Day Report. University of Missouri, pp. 13–17.Google Scholar
Dean, B. T., & Tribble, L. F., 1961. Reproductive performance of swine fed different planes of energy during gestation. Res. Bull. Missouri agrie. Exp. Sta., no. 774.Google Scholar
Eyles, D. E., 1959. Feeding and management of pregnant sows on pasture. Anim. Prod., 1: 1–41.Google Scholar
Henson, D. B., Eason, D. W., & Clawson, A. J., 1964. Reproductive performance of swine as influenced by pregestation and gestation feeding levels. J. Anim. Sci., 23: 878.Google Scholar
Lodge, G. A., 1959. The energy requirements of lactating sows and the influence of level of food intake upon milk production and reproductive performance. J. agric. Sci., 53: 53–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lodge, G. A., McDonald, I., & MacPherson, R. M., 1961. Further observations on the relative influence of birth weight and creep feed consumption on the 3- and 8-week weights of sucking pigs. Anim. Prod., 3: 3–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Research Council, 1964. Nutrient requirements of domestic animals. 2. Nutrient requirements of swine. Publ. no. 1192. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
O'Grady, J. F., 1962. Feeding of pregnant sows. Research Report, Animal Production Division, An Foras Talúntais, Dublin, pp. 49 and 50.Google Scholar
O'Grady, J. F., 1963. Feeding of pregnant sows. Research Report, Animal Production Division, An Foras Taluntais, Dublin, pp. 48 and 49.Google Scholar
Rippel, R. H., Rasmussen, O. G., Norton, H. W., Becker, D. E., & Jenson, A. H., 1962. Reproductive performance of swine fed different sources and levels of protein. J. Anim. Sci., 21: 1010 (Soc. Proc.).Google Scholar
Salmon-legagneur, E., 1962. Effet chronologique d'une modification du niveau alimentaire chez la truie gestante. Ann. Zootech., 11: 11–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salmon-legagneur, E., 1964. Étude du besoin qualitatif d'azote chez la truie en gestation et lactation. Comparison de deux protéines: farine de poisson et arachide. Ann. Zootech., 13: 13–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salmon-legagneur, E., Gomez, G., & Jacquot, R., 1960. Influence de la suralimentation en fin de gestation sur la production laitière de la truie. C.R. Acad. Agric., 46: 46–445.Google Scholar
Salmon-legagneur, E., & Jacquot, R., 1961. Influence du niveau alimentaire sur le comportement nutritionnel de la truie gestante. C.R. Acad. Sci., 253: 253–1497.Google Scholar
Self, H. L., Grummer, R. H., Hays, O. E., & Spies, H. G., 1960. Influence of three different feeding levels during growth and gestation on reproduction, weight, gains and carcass quality in swine. J. Anim. Sci., 19: 19–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar