Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-02T04:59:52.504Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The feed intake of milk cows II. The effect of roughage quality during late pregnancy and lactation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

W. Holmes  and
J. G. W. Jones
W. Holmes
Affiliation:
Wye College (University of London), Ashford, Kent
J. G. W. Jones
Affiliation:
Wye College (University of London), Ashford, Kent
Get access

Summary

1. An experiment is described in which the individual feed intakes of 16 cows under winter housing conditions in yards, during the transition to spring grazing and on. summer grazing, were determined by faecal indexdigestibility methods. The influence of quality of feed before calving on intake and subsequent performance and the influence of pasture quality and availability on feed intake were included in the study.

2. The provision of a diet of 67% organic matter digestibility, either as high quality hay or as low quality hay with concentrates, increased feed intake before calving when compared with a diet of low quality hay (digestibility 62%) alone. Compared with previous lactation yields the better diets were associated with the maintenance of milk yield, while the low quality hay diet before calving was associated with a 10%, but non-significant, reduction in milk yield.

3. There was a marked rise in faecal output and digestible organic matter (DOM) intake after calving. During lactation, and especially on pasture, faecal output and DOM intake were both correlated with milk yield and metabolic live-weight. Total DOM intake was lower when the availability of feed was restricted and increased when feed was readily available; this increase was associated with a high maintenance requirement.

4. When herbage with OM digestibility of 74–82% was consumed, faecal output rose with decreasing digestibility, but DOM intakes were relatively constant. Provided that efficient utilisation can be achieved, total utilisation per acre might be increased if herbage were grazed at the lower end of this range of digestibility.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , January 1965 , pp. 39 - 51
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

British Standards Institution, 1955. Gerber method for the determination of fat in milk and milk products. (B.S. 696.)Google Scholar
Christian, K. R., & Coup, M. R., 1954. Measurement of feed intake by grazing cattle and sheep. VI. The determination of chromic oxide in faeces. N.Z. J. Sci. Tech. A, 36: 328.Google Scholar
Corbett, J. L., Langlands, J. P., & Boyne, A. W., 1962. An estimate of the energy expended for maintenance by strip grazed dairy cows. Proc. VIIIth int. Congr. Anim. Prod., Hamburg, 3: 245.Google Scholar
Corbett, J. L., Langlands, J. P., & Reid, G. W., 1963. Effects of season of growth and of digestibility of herbage on intake by grazing dairy cows. Anim. Prod., 5: 119.Google Scholar
Freer, M., & Campling, R. C., 1963. Factors affecting the voluntary intake of food by cows. 5. The relationship between the voluntary intake of food, the amount of digesta in the reticulo-rumen and the rate of disappearance of digesta from the alimentary tract with diets of hay, dried grass or concentrates. Brit. J. Nutr., 17: 79.Google Scholar
Grassland Research Institute, 1961. Research techniques in use at the Grassland Research Institute, Hurley. Bull. Commonw. Bur. Past. Fid Crops, no. 45.Google Scholar
Greenhalgh, J. F. D., & Runcie, K. V., 1962. The herbage intake and milk production of strip-and zero-grazed dairy cows. J. agric. Sci., 59: 95.Google Scholar
Holmes, W., Jones, J. G. W., & Drake-Brockman, R. M., 1961. The feed intake of grazing cattle. II. The influence of size of animal on feed intake. Anim. Prod., 3: 131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, W., Jones, J. G. W., Drake-Brockman, R. M., & White, N., 1965. The feed intake of milk cows. I. Intake of winter rations during pregnancy and lactation and the influence of change to pasture. Anim. Prod., 7: 27.Google Scholar
Hutton, J. B., 1962. The maintenance requirements of New Zealand dairy cattle. Proc. N.Z. Soc. Anim. Prod., 22: 12.Google Scholar
Hutton, J. B., 1963. The effect of lactation on intake in the dairy cow. Proc. N.Z. Soc. Anim. Prod., 23: 39.Google Scholar
Langlands, J. P., Corbett, J. L., McDonald, I., & Reid, G. W., 1963. Estimation of the faeces output of grazing animals from the concentration of chromium sesquioxide in a sample of faeces. 2. Comparison of estimates from samples taken at fixed times of day with estimates from samples collected from the sward. Brit. J. Nutr., 17: 219.Google Scholar
Line, C., 1961. Maximum milk production from pasture. Proc. VIIIth int. Grassl. Congr., Reading, p. 598.Google Scholar
Raymond, W. F., 1964. The efficient use of grass. J. Brit. Grassl. Soc, 19: 81.Google Scholar
Reid, J. T., 1959. Pasture evaluation in relation to feed efficiency. In Nutritional and Economic Aspects of Feed Utilisation by Dairy Cows. Iowa State College Press, Ames, la.Google Scholar
Stevenson, Audrey E., 1962. Measurement of feed intake by grazing cattle and sheep. VIII. Some observations on the accuracy of the chromic oxide technique for the estimation of faeces output of dairy cattle. N.Z. J. agric. Res., 5: 339.Google Scholar
Waite, R., Holmes, W., Campbell, Jean I., & Fergusson, D. L., 1950. Studies in grazing management. II. The amount and chemical composition of herbage eaten by dairy cattle under close folding and rotational methods of grazing. J. agric. Sci., 40: 392.Google Scholar