Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-tbj44 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T05:03:21.652Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Genetic relations between milk and beef characters in dual-purpose cattle breeds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

I. L. Mason
I. L. Mason
Affiliation:
A.R.C. Unit of Animal Genetics, Institute of Animal Genetics, Edinburgh 9
Get access

Extract

It has been estimated (Mason, 1963) that about 70% of beef stores bred in Britain are out of dairy cows. Some 30–40% of them are by beef bulls, so that about 40–50% of animals slaughtered for beef are of pure dairy breeding.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 6 , Issue 1 , February 1964 , pp. 31 - 45
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1964

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Auriol, P. & Mouoin, B., 1961. Production laitiere et conformation dans la race montbèliarde. I. Hèritabilitè de la production laitière et de diffèrentes mesures corporelles. Corrèlations phènotypiques et gènètiques entre ces mesures et la production laitiére. Ann. Zootech., 10: 5.Google Scholar
Blackmore, D. W., McGilliard, L. D. & Lush, J. C., 1958. Relationships between body measurements, meat conformation, and milk production. J. Dairy Sci., 41: 1050.Google Scholar
Cook, A. C., Black, W. H., Knapp, Bradford Jr & Phillips, R. W., 1942. Relationship of milk production of Milking Shorthorn dams to the carcass quality of their steer progeny. J. Anim. Sci., 1: 345 (Soc. Proa).Google Scholar
Hazel, L. N., 1943. The genetic basis for constructing selection indexes. Genetics, 28: 476.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Langlet, J. F., 1962. Some aspects of selection with regard to the improvement of beef production. NATO 3rd Summer Course on Organisation and Evaluation of Animal Production in Larger Areas, Wageningen, 1962. (Mimeograph, 8 pp.)Google Scholar
Mason, I. L., 1952. Beef production from Red Poll steers. Red Poll Rev., no. 105: 26.Google Scholar
Mason, I. L., 1953. Beef production from Dairy Shorthorn steers. Dairy Shorthorn J., 22: 228.Google Scholar
Mason, I. L., 1962a. Contribution of the dairy farm to beef production. NATO 3rd Summer Course, on Organisation and Evaluation of Animal Production in Larger Areas, Wageningen, 1962. (Mimeograph, 21 pp.)Google Scholar
Mason, I. L., 1962b. Genetic relations between meat and milk production in dual-purpose cattle breeds. Anim. Prod., 4: 292 (Soc. Proc.)Google Scholar
Mason, I. L., 1963. Breeding for beef in Britain. J. Irish Grassl. Assoc. (Anim. Prod. Soc), Spring 1963: 24.Google Scholar
Mason, I. L., Robertson, Alan & Gjelstad, B., 1957. The genetic connection between body size, milk production and efficiency in dairy cattle. J. Dairy Res., 24: 135.Google Scholar
Miller, R. H. & McGilliard, L. D., 1959. Relations between weight at first calving and milk production during the first lactation. J. Dairy Sci., 42: 1932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ptrchner, F., 1959. Statistisch-genetische Untersuchungen an alpinem Braunvieh. Z. Tierz. ZuchtBiol., 73: 129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reeve, E. C. R., 1955. The variance of the genetic correlation coefficient. Biometrics, 11: 357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rendel, J. M., Robertson, Alan, Asker, A. A., Khishtn, S. S. & Ragab, M. T., 1957. The inheritance of milk production characteristics. J. agric. Sci., 48: 426.Google Scholar
Robertson, Alan, 1959a. Populationsgenetik und quantitative Vererbung. In Handbuch der Tierzüchtung. Vol. 2, Chap. 3, pp. 77–104. Hamburg and Berlin: PaulParey.Google Scholar
Robertson, Alan, 1959b. The sampling variance of the correlation coefficient. Biometrics, 15: 409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, Alan, 1962. Weighting in the estimation of variance components in the unbalanced single classification. Biometrics, 18: 413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, Alan & Khishin, S. S., 1958. An analysis of the variation between dairy-sire progeny-groups for milk yield and fat content. Proc. Brit. Soc. Anim. Prod., p. 19.Google Scholar
Robertson, Alan, Stewart, A., and Ashton, E. D., 1956. The progeny assessment of dairy sires for milk: the use of contemporary comparisons. Proc. Brit. Soc. Anim. Prod., p. 43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Touchberry, R. W., 1951. Genetic correlations between five body measurements, weight, type and production in the same individual among Holstein cows. J. Dairy Sci., 34: 242.Google Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture, 1947. Milk production of dam reflected in slaughter grade of steer. Rep. Bur. Anim. Ind., Agric. Res. Admin., U.S. Dep. Agric., p. 10.Google Scholar
Vial, V. E. & Mason, I. L., 1962. Heritability estimates for growth and carcass characters in Friesian steers. VIII. Int. Tierzuchtkongress, Hamburg, 1961. III. Schlussbericht, p. 20.Google Scholar
Warwick, E. J., 1960. Genetic aspects of production efficiency in beef cattle. Beef for Tomorrow. Pub. No. 751, Nat. Acad. Sci.—Nat. Res. Counc., p. 82.Google Scholar